New Polish Right – politeness and radicalism. A corpus analysis of Krzysztof Bosak’s (de)legitimation strategies on twitter

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE New Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-06-29 DOI:10.1177/2336825X231187278
M. Kosman
{"title":"New Polish Right – politeness and radicalism. A corpus analysis of Krzysztof Bosak’s (de)legitimation strategies on twitter","authors":"M. Kosman","doi":"10.1177/2336825X231187278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses (de)legitimation strategies of Krzysztof Bosak, one of the leaders of the Confederation Liberty and Independence, a Polish coalition of right-wing movements. The success of the formation appears to be in line with that of other European (far) right-wing parties, which have become politically relevant in recent decades. Despite the Confederation’s growing position in European politics, there is a paucity of research devoted to the party. The present paper attempts to bridge the gap by focusing on Bosak’s 2020 presidential campaign and the politician’s use of Twitter. In order to investigate Bosak’s discourse in detail, corpus linguistic methods were used. As they allow the researcher to work on large samples of data, Bosak’s tweets were investigated at both qualitative and quantitative levels. The results suggest that the candidate focused on legitimizing Catholicism and conservative ideas. At the same time, he delegitimised the left and LGBT communities, framing the presidential campaign as a clash between the conservative order.","PeriodicalId":42556,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X231187278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses (de)legitimation strategies of Krzysztof Bosak, one of the leaders of the Confederation Liberty and Independence, a Polish coalition of right-wing movements. The success of the formation appears to be in line with that of other European (far) right-wing parties, which have become politically relevant in recent decades. Despite the Confederation’s growing position in European politics, there is a paucity of research devoted to the party. The present paper attempts to bridge the gap by focusing on Bosak’s 2020 presidential campaign and the politician’s use of Twitter. In order to investigate Bosak’s discourse in detail, corpus linguistic methods were used. As they allow the researcher to work on large samples of data, Bosak’s tweets were investigated at both qualitative and quantitative levels. The results suggest that the candidate focused on legitimizing Catholicism and conservative ideas. At the same time, he delegitimised the left and LGBT communities, framing the presidential campaign as a clash between the conservative order.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新波兰右派——礼貌和激进主义。博萨克在推特上的(非)正当化策略的语料库分析
本文讨论了波兰右翼运动联盟“自由与独立联盟”的领导人之一克日什托夫·博萨克(krzysztofbosak)的合法化策略。该组织的成功似乎与其他欧洲(极右翼)政党一致,这些政党在近几十年来已成为政治相关。尽管联邦在欧洲政治中的地位越来越高,但对该党的研究却很少。本文试图通过关注博萨克2020年的总统竞选和这位政治家对Twitter的使用来弥合这一差距。为了对博萨克语篇进行详细的研究,我们采用了语料库语言学的方法。由于他们允许研究人员对大量数据样本进行研究,因此对博萨克的推文进行了定性和定量两方面的调查。结果显示,他的竞选重点是天主教和保守思想的合法化。与此同时,他使左翼和LGBT群体失去了合法性,将总统竞选定性为保守秩序之间的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Perspectives
New Perspectives POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: New Perspectives is an academic journal that seeks to provide interdisciplinary insight into the politics and international relations of Central and Eastern Europe. New Perspectives is published by the Institute of International Relations Prague.
期刊最新文献
The spatial repercussions of Russia’s war in Ukraine: Region(alism)s, borders, insecurities Understanding the grain deal and its pitfalls: Going beyond food security? The grammars of globalisation and the languages of regionalism: The war in Ukraine as a milestone and a test Polling to vaccination stations: Brexit’s influence on immunisation uptake Russian war, Estonian exceptions: Sovereignty, governmentality, biopolitics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1