{"title":"Nature Management from the Perspective of the Ministers of Agriculture and State Property of the Russian Empire","authors":"N. Tsintsadze","doi":"10.21638/spbu02.2022.304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines how the reports of ministers of Agriculture and State Property reflected the results of their official trips across the Russian Empire and their evaluation of the manifestation of intensive use of natural resources. It also analyses the impact of their opinions and suggestions with regard to the state nature management. The main methodological approach lies in the ideas of environmental history — an interdisciplinary scientific area devoted to various aspects of interaction between man and nature. Ministerial notes on the results of their official trips, along with the State Audit Office, senatorial audits, annual reports of ministers and governors, created an overall picture of the state affairs for the emperor. The article presents an analysis of 11 reports by M. N. Ostrovskii and A. S. Ermolov for the 1880s–1900s based on the archival and published sources. The duality of perception of environmental problems by ministers is noted: they had to balance between the maximum use of natural resources for the economy and the need to protect them from depletion. Often, the ministers’ suggestions on the careful nature management were taken into account in the government decisions. Thus, since the end of the 19th century, reclamation, reforestation, and other activities had been actively carried out. Also, there was an intensive development of the Ural and Siberian resources. The trips of the ministers of Agriculture and State property played an important role in identifying, diagnosing, and minimizing the environmental problems. However, the state nature restoration didn’t adequately compensate anthropogenic damage to nature. That was because the state paid more attention to geopolitical and economic development, which led to the extensive use and depletion of natural resources.","PeriodicalId":53995,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Istoriya","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Istoriya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2022.304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article examines how the reports of ministers of Agriculture and State Property reflected the results of their official trips across the Russian Empire and their evaluation of the manifestation of intensive use of natural resources. It also analyses the impact of their opinions and suggestions with regard to the state nature management. The main methodological approach lies in the ideas of environmental history — an interdisciplinary scientific area devoted to various aspects of interaction between man and nature. Ministerial notes on the results of their official trips, along with the State Audit Office, senatorial audits, annual reports of ministers and governors, created an overall picture of the state affairs for the emperor. The article presents an analysis of 11 reports by M. N. Ostrovskii and A. S. Ermolov for the 1880s–1900s based on the archival and published sources. The duality of perception of environmental problems by ministers is noted: they had to balance between the maximum use of natural resources for the economy and the need to protect them from depletion. Often, the ministers’ suggestions on the careful nature management were taken into account in the government decisions. Thus, since the end of the 19th century, reclamation, reforestation, and other activities had been actively carried out. Also, there was an intensive development of the Ural and Siberian resources. The trips of the ministers of Agriculture and State property played an important role in identifying, diagnosing, and minimizing the environmental problems. However, the state nature restoration didn’t adequately compensate anthropogenic damage to nature. That was because the state paid more attention to geopolitical and economic development, which led to the extensive use and depletion of natural resources.
本文考察了农业和国有财产部长的报告如何反映他们在俄罗斯帝国的官方旅行结果,以及他们对自然资源集约利用表现的评估。分析了他们的意见和建议对国家自然管理的影响。主要的方法方法在于环境史的思想,这是一个跨学科的科学领域,致力于人与自然之间相互作用的各个方面。大臣们对他们公务旅行结果的记录,连同国家审计署、参议院审计、大臣和总督的年度报告,为皇帝创造了一个国家事务的整体图景。本文根据档案和已发表的资料,对M. N. ostrovski和A. S. Ermolov在19世纪80年代至20世纪的11份报告进行了分析。报告指出,部长们对环境问题的看法是两面性的:他们必须在最大限度地利用自然资源促进经济和保护自然资源不致枯竭之间取得平衡。政府的决策通常会考虑部长们关于谨慎自然管理的建议。因此,自19世纪末以来,开垦、重新造林等活动一直在积极开展。此外,乌拉尔和西伯利亚的资源也得到了大力开发。农业部长和国有财产部长的访问在查明、诊断和尽量减少环境问题方面发挥了重要作用。然而,国家自然恢复并没有充分补偿人为对自然的破坏。这是因为国家更加注重地缘政治和经济发展,这导致了自然资源的大量使用和枯竭。