{"title":"Cropscapes and History","authors":"F. Bray, B. Hahn, J. Lourdusamy, Tiago Saraiva","doi":"10.3167/trans.2019.090103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crops are a very special type of human artifact, living organisms literally rooted\nin their environments. Crops suggest ways to embed rootedness in mobility\nstudies, fleshing out the linkages between flows and matrices and thus developing effective frameworks for reconnecting local and global history. Our\nfocus here is on the movements, or failures to move, of “cropscapes”: the\never-mutating ecologies, or matrices, comprising assemblages of nonhumans\nand humans, within which a particular crop in a particular place and time\nflourishes or fails. As with the landscape, the cropscape as concept and analytical tool implies a deliberate choice of frame. In playing with how to frame\nour selected cropscapes spatially and chronologically, we develop productive\nalternatives to latent Eurocentric and modernist assumptions about periodization,\ngeographical hierarchies, and scale that still prevail within history of technology, global and comparative history, and indeed within broader public\nunderstanding of mobility and history.","PeriodicalId":43789,"journal":{"name":"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfers-Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/trans.2019.090103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Crops are a very special type of human artifact, living organisms literally rooted
in their environments. Crops suggest ways to embed rootedness in mobility
studies, fleshing out the linkages between flows and matrices and thus developing effective frameworks for reconnecting local and global history. Our
focus here is on the movements, or failures to move, of “cropscapes”: the
ever-mutating ecologies, or matrices, comprising assemblages of nonhumans
and humans, within which a particular crop in a particular place and time
flourishes or fails. As with the landscape, the cropscape as concept and analytical tool implies a deliberate choice of frame. In playing with how to frame
our selected cropscapes spatially and chronologically, we develop productive
alternatives to latent Eurocentric and modernist assumptions about periodization,
geographical hierarchies, and scale that still prevail within history of technology, global and comparative history, and indeed within broader public
understanding of mobility and history.