Deliberate Teaching of Collocations – an Intervention Study of Czech Upper-Intermediate EFL Students

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pedagogika-Pedagogy Pub Date : 2023-08-08 DOI:10.14712/23362189.2023.2918
Petra Kacafírková, Klára Špačková, Hana Valentová, Petra Topková, A. Kucharska
{"title":"Deliberate Teaching of Collocations – an Intervention Study of Czech Upper-Intermediate EFL Students","authors":"Petra Kacafírková, Klára Špačková, Hana Valentová, Petra Topková, A. Kucharska","doi":"10.14712/23362189.2023.2918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collocation knowledge is claimed to be poor even among upper-intermediate and advanced learners of English as a second language, which implies that not enough attention is being drawn to these lexical items in lessons. To address this problem, we designed a 12-week teaching intervention in which the participants (39 students of Charles University in Prague) were divided into two groups: an experimental group with an intensive explicit collocation focus (20) and a control group with no such care dedicated to collocations (19). Th e division of the students was performed in such a way that the groups were equal in terms of the variables whichtend to infl uence the learning process the most, namely language aptitude, anxiety, motivation, and learning strategies. Th e results showed that the experimental group achieved signifi cantly higher scores for collocation knowledge. No signifi cant diff erence was found between the groups in understanding of word meanings. Deliberate teaching of collocations with systematic revisionand practice thus proved to be more eff ective than meaning-focused teaching of individual words.","PeriodicalId":44645,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogika-Pedagogy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogika-Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23362189.2023.2918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collocation knowledge is claimed to be poor even among upper-intermediate and advanced learners of English as a second language, which implies that not enough attention is being drawn to these lexical items in lessons. To address this problem, we designed a 12-week teaching intervention in which the participants (39 students of Charles University in Prague) were divided into two groups: an experimental group with an intensive explicit collocation focus (20) and a control group with no such care dedicated to collocations (19). Th e division of the students was performed in such a way that the groups were equal in terms of the variables whichtend to infl uence the learning process the most, namely language aptitude, anxiety, motivation, and learning strategies. Th e results showed that the experimental group achieved signifi cantly higher scores for collocation knowledge. No signifi cant diff erence was found between the groups in understanding of word meanings. Deliberate teaching of collocations with systematic revisionand practice thus proved to be more eff ective than meaning-focused teaching of individual words.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刻意搭配教学——捷克英语中上学生的干预研究
搭配知识据称在英语作为第二语言的中高级学习者中也很差,这意味着在课程中没有足够的关注这些词汇项目。为了解决这一问题,我们设计了一项为期12周的教学干预,其中参与者(布拉格查尔斯大学的39名学生)被分为两组:实验组(20)和对照组(19),前者注重明确搭配,后者不注重搭配。在对学生进行划分时,各组在对学习过程影响最大的变量(即语言能力、焦虑、动机和学习策略)方面是平等的。结果表明,实验组在搭配知识方面得分显著提高。两组学生对词义的理解无显著差异。有目的性的搭配教学,通过系统的修改和实践,比单个单词的意义教学更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogika-Pedagogy
Pedagogika-Pedagogy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges to Entrepreneurship Education in High School. Interaction between Formal and Informal Assessment Designing a University Environment for Inclusive Digital Education – Methods and Approaches The Problem with Penmanship in the Bulgarian Education System Free Online Resources in Teaching Mathematics The Stereotypes of Pedagogical Students – Barriers to the Implementation of Quality Inclusive Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1