Hybrid Methods for Analysis of Fractured Well Production from Liquids Rich Duvernay Shale

J. Mahadevan, Huanzhen Hu
{"title":"Hybrid Methods for Analysis of Fractured Well Production from Liquids Rich Duvernay Shale","authors":"J. Mahadevan, Huanzhen Hu","doi":"10.2118/195798-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objectives/Scope: In order to maximize the recovery of hydrocarbons from liquids rich shale reservoir systems, the cause and effect relationships between production and the stimulation methods need to be clearly understood. In this study, we integrate a production data regression approach with flow simulation methods to understand the fractured well production behavior and field wide well performance in a liquids rich petroleum system in the Duvernay Basin.\n Methods, Procedures, Process: Statistical models assume no physical relationship between the model parameters and the response variable, which in this case is produced volumes over a period of time. On the other hand, simulation studies incorporate physical mechanisms of flow to model and predict the production behavior. The simulation models, however, fall short of incorporating all the mechanisms contributing to the production behavior in the complex shale gas reservoir. Thus there is a need for integration of statistical approaches of understanding production behavior along with physics based model and simulation approach.\n Results, Observations, Conclusions: Multivariate linear regression analysis of the 6 month produced volume and its relationship with parameters such as fracture fluid volumes used, proppant weight placed, and number of stages fractured provides a model with reasonably good correlation. The 6 month produced volumes correlate with large proppant weights, lower fluid placements and greater density of fracture stages. Use of Random Forests machine learning algorithm on the dataset confirms that the total proppant placed, well length completed with fractures have high importance coefficients. In order to examine the well performance using full physical models, fractured well simulations were performed on particular wells using the trilinear model. The trilinear model predictions were compared against other production analyses and the regression model results for consistency. The models showed that in the absence of stress dependent permeability, the production forecast was much higher. Thus, stress dependent permeability appears to be an important factor in the modeling and prediction of production from liquids rich shale reservoirs.\n Novel/Additive Information: In this study we describe a method to understand the production data from a liquids rich shale reservoir, by integrating multivariate linear regression analysis, machine learning algorithms along with physical model simulations. The results are novel and offer a method to validate either approach to understand cause and effect relationships. This approach may be classified as a new hybrid modeling approach that may potentially be used to optimize stimulation techniques in liquids rich shale reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":10909,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195798-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives/Scope: In order to maximize the recovery of hydrocarbons from liquids rich shale reservoir systems, the cause and effect relationships between production and the stimulation methods need to be clearly understood. In this study, we integrate a production data regression approach with flow simulation methods to understand the fractured well production behavior and field wide well performance in a liquids rich petroleum system in the Duvernay Basin. Methods, Procedures, Process: Statistical models assume no physical relationship between the model parameters and the response variable, which in this case is produced volumes over a period of time. On the other hand, simulation studies incorporate physical mechanisms of flow to model and predict the production behavior. The simulation models, however, fall short of incorporating all the mechanisms contributing to the production behavior in the complex shale gas reservoir. Thus there is a need for integration of statistical approaches of understanding production behavior along with physics based model and simulation approach. Results, Observations, Conclusions: Multivariate linear regression analysis of the 6 month produced volume and its relationship with parameters such as fracture fluid volumes used, proppant weight placed, and number of stages fractured provides a model with reasonably good correlation. The 6 month produced volumes correlate with large proppant weights, lower fluid placements and greater density of fracture stages. Use of Random Forests machine learning algorithm on the dataset confirms that the total proppant placed, well length completed with fractures have high importance coefficients. In order to examine the well performance using full physical models, fractured well simulations were performed on particular wells using the trilinear model. The trilinear model predictions were compared against other production analyses and the regression model results for consistency. The models showed that in the absence of stress dependent permeability, the production forecast was much higher. Thus, stress dependent permeability appears to be an important factor in the modeling and prediction of production from liquids rich shale reservoirs. Novel/Additive Information: In this study we describe a method to understand the production data from a liquids rich shale reservoir, by integrating multivariate linear regression analysis, machine learning algorithms along with physical model simulations. The results are novel and offer a method to validate either approach to understand cause and effect relationships. This approach may be classified as a new hybrid modeling approach that may potentially be used to optimize stimulation techniques in liquids rich shale reservoirs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富液Duvernay页岩压裂井产量分析的混合方法
目标/范围:为了最大限度地从富含液体的页岩储层系统中开采碳氢化合物,需要清楚地了解产量与增产方法之间的因果关系。在这项研究中,我们将生产数据回归方法与流动模拟方法相结合,以了解Duvernay盆地富液油气系统中压裂井的生产行为和全油田的井动态。方法、步骤、过程:统计模型假设模型参数和响应变量之间没有物理关系,在这种情况下,响应变量是在一段时间内产生的量。另一方面,模拟研究结合了流体的物理机制来模拟和预测生产行为。然而,这些模拟模型并没有考虑到影响复杂页岩气储层生产行为的所有机制。因此,有必要将理解生产行为的统计方法与基于物理的模型和模拟方法相结合。结果、观察、结论:对6个月的产量及其与压裂液用量、支撑剂重量、压裂段数等参数的关系进行多元线性回归分析,得出了一个相关性较好的模型。6个月的产量与较大的支撑剂重量、较低的流体放置量和较大的压裂段密度有关。随机森林机器学习算法在数据集上的使用证实,所放置的总支撑剂、裂缝完井井长具有很高的重要系数。为了使用全物理模型来检验井的性能,使用三线性模型对特定井进行了压裂井模拟。将三线性模型预测结果与其他生产分析和回归模型结果进行了一致性比较。模型表明,在不考虑应力相关渗透率的情况下,产量预测要高得多。因此,应力相关渗透率似乎是模拟和预测富液页岩储层产量的一个重要因素。新颖/附加信息:在本研究中,我们描述了一种方法,通过整合多元线性回归分析、机器学习算法以及物理模型模拟,来了解富液页岩储层的生产数据。结果是新颖的,并提供了一种方法来验证任何一种方法来理解因果关系。这种方法可以归类为一种新的混合建模方法,可能用于优化富液页岩储层的增产技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verification of Autonomous Inflow Control Valve Flow Performance Within Heavy Oil-SAGD Thermal Flow Loop Reactive vs Proactive Intelligent Well Injection Evaluation for EOR in a Stratified GOM Deepwater Wilcox Reservoir using Integrated Simulation-Surface Network Modeling A Novel Workflow for Oil Production Forecasting using Ensemble-Based Decline Curve Analysis An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict the Water Saturation in Carbonate Reservoir Rocks Characterization of Organic Pores within High-Maturation Shale Gas Reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1