Discrimination against robots: Discussing the ethics of social interactions and who is harmed

Jessica K. Barfield
{"title":"Discrimination against robots: Discussing the ethics of social interactions and who is harmed","authors":"Jessica K. Barfield","doi":"10.1515/pjbr-2022-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article discusses the topic of ethics and policy for human interaction with robots. The term “robot ethics” (or roboethics) is generally concerned with ethical problems that may occur when humans and robots interact in social situations or when robots make decisions which could impact human well-being. For example, whether robots pose a threat to humans in warfare, the use of robots as caregivers, or the use of robots which make decisions which could impact historically disadvantaged populations. In each case, the focus of the discussion is predominantly on how to design robots that act ethically toward humans (some refer to this issue as “machine ethics”). Alternatively, robot ethics could refer to the ethics associated with human behavior toward robots especially as robots become active members of society. It is this latter and relatively unexplored view of robot ethics that this article focuses on, and specifically whether robots will be the subject of discriminatory and biased responses from humans based on the robot’s perceived race, gender, or ethnicity. If so, the paper considers what issues are implicated, and how society might respond? From past research, preliminary evidence suggests that acts of discrimination which may be directed against people may also be expressed toward robots experienced in social contexts; therefore, discrimination against robots as a function of their physical design and behavior is an important and timely topic of discussion for robot ethics, human–robot interaction, and the design of social robots.","PeriodicalId":90037,"journal":{"name":"Paladyn : journal of behavioral robotics","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paladyn : journal of behavioral robotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2022-0113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses the topic of ethics and policy for human interaction with robots. The term “robot ethics” (or roboethics) is generally concerned with ethical problems that may occur when humans and robots interact in social situations or when robots make decisions which could impact human well-being. For example, whether robots pose a threat to humans in warfare, the use of robots as caregivers, or the use of robots which make decisions which could impact historically disadvantaged populations. In each case, the focus of the discussion is predominantly on how to design robots that act ethically toward humans (some refer to this issue as “machine ethics”). Alternatively, robot ethics could refer to the ethics associated with human behavior toward robots especially as robots become active members of society. It is this latter and relatively unexplored view of robot ethics that this article focuses on, and specifically whether robots will be the subject of discriminatory and biased responses from humans based on the robot’s perceived race, gender, or ethnicity. If so, the paper considers what issues are implicated, and how society might respond? From past research, preliminary evidence suggests that acts of discrimination which may be directed against people may also be expressed toward robots experienced in social contexts; therefore, discrimination against robots as a function of their physical design and behavior is an important and timely topic of discussion for robot ethics, human–robot interaction, and the design of social robots.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对机器人的歧视:讨论社会互动的伦理和谁受到伤害
摘要:本文讨论了人类与机器人互动的伦理和政策问题。术语“机器人伦理”(或机器人伦理)通常涉及人类和机器人在社交场合互动或机器人做出可能影响人类福祉的决定时可能发生的伦理问题。例如,机器人是否在战争中对人类构成威胁,使用机器人作为护理人员,或者使用机器人做出可能影响历史上处于不利地位的人群的决定。在每种情况下,讨论的重点主要是如何设计对人类有道德行为的机器人(有些人把这个问题称为“机器伦理”)。或者,机器人伦理可以指与人类对机器人的行为有关的伦理,特别是当机器人成为社会的积极成员时。本文关注的是后一种相对未被探索的机器人伦理观点,特别是机器人是否会因为机器人的种族、性别或民族而受到人类的歧视和偏见。如果是这样,论文将考虑涉及哪些问题,以及社会可能如何回应?从过去的研究来看,初步证据表明,可能针对人类的歧视行为也可能针对在社会环境中经历过的机器人;因此,对机器人的歧视作为其物理设计和行为的函数,是机器人伦理学、人机交互和社交机器人设计的一个重要而及时的讨论话题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robot-assisted therapy for upper limb impairments in cerebral palsy: A scoping review and suggestions for future research Discrimination against robots: Discussing the ethics of social interactions and who is harmed Power quality enhancement of solar–wind grid connected system employing genetic-based ANFIS controller Control optimization of taper interference coupling system for large piston compressor in the smart industries Ultra-low latency communication technology for Augmented Reality application in mobile periphery computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1