Embodied Loss and the Psychophysiological Effects of Pain Examined With Traditional and New Behavioral Measures

Q2 Social Sciences Illness Crisis and Loss Pub Date : 2021-06-24 DOI:10.1177/10541373211020667
Preston A. Long, X. T. Wang
{"title":"Embodied Loss and the Psychophysiological Effects of Pain Examined With Traditional and New Behavioral Measures","authors":"Preston A. Long, X. T. Wang","doi":"10.1177/10541373211020667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a robust decision phenomenon of loss aversion, people are distinctly more sensitive to losses than to gains. The psychological pain experienced due to a loss is greater than the pleasure experienced due to a gain of the same amount. We argue that physical pain can be viewed as a psychological loss with diminishing sensitivity. Pain thus would be preferred summed rather than distributed. The results from 89 student-participants recruited from a public university in the Midwest US revealed that chronic pain is correlated with reduced subjective life expectancy and increased impulsivity. We found a significant propensity to prefer sharp-and-shorter pain to milder-and-longer pain. The loss-aversion score predicted this propensity in pain management. We developed a new behavioral measure of Band-Aid removal as a predictor for pain duration-intensity tradeoff. The higher the Band-Aid removal time, the higher the preference for higher-duration and lower intensity, and the lower willingness to seek medical attention for pain. The participants also revealed a higher willingness to seek medical help for generalized pain than localized pain to reduce information ambiguity.","PeriodicalId":39747,"journal":{"name":"Illness Crisis and Loss","volume":"154 1","pages":"729 - 740"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Illness Crisis and Loss","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10541373211020667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on a robust decision phenomenon of loss aversion, people are distinctly more sensitive to losses than to gains. The psychological pain experienced due to a loss is greater than the pleasure experienced due to a gain of the same amount. We argue that physical pain can be viewed as a psychological loss with diminishing sensitivity. Pain thus would be preferred summed rather than distributed. The results from 89 student-participants recruited from a public university in the Midwest US revealed that chronic pain is correlated with reduced subjective life expectancy and increased impulsivity. We found a significant propensity to prefer sharp-and-shorter pain to milder-and-longer pain. The loss-aversion score predicted this propensity in pain management. We developed a new behavioral measure of Band-Aid removal as a predictor for pain duration-intensity tradeoff. The higher the Band-Aid removal time, the higher the preference for higher-duration and lower intensity, and the lower willingness to seek medical attention for pain. The participants also revealed a higher willingness to seek medical help for generalized pain than localized pain to reduce information ambiguity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用传统和新的行为学方法研究疼痛的具身损失和心理生理效应
基于损失厌恶这一稳健的决策现象,人们对损失的敏感度明显高于对收益的敏感度。因失去而经历的心理痛苦比因获得同样数量的东西而经历的快乐更大。我们认为,身体上的疼痛可以被视为一种心理上的损失,其敏感性正在下降。因此,痛苦更倾向于被汇总而不是被分配。从美国中西部一所公立大学招募的89名学生参与者的研究结果显示,慢性疼痛与主观预期寿命缩短和冲动增加有关。我们发现,比起轻微而持久的疼痛,人们更喜欢剧烈而短暂的疼痛。损失厌恶得分预测了疼痛管理中的这种倾向。我们开发了一种新的行为测量创可贴去除作为疼痛持续时间-强度权衡的预测指标。拔除创可贴时间越长,对高持续时间、低强度创可贴的偏好越高,疼痛就医意愿越低。为了减少信息歧义,参与者还表现出对全身性疼痛比局部疼痛寻求医疗帮助的意愿更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Illness Crisis and Loss
Illness Crisis and Loss Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: When dealing with issues of grief, crisis, or loss as a counselor, medical professional, or researcher, it can be difficult to find resources to help you in your work. Receiving the most current research on the latest topics in the field from Illness, Crisis & Loss can help. Illness, Crisis & Loss is the resource that furthers your understanding and knowledge of the psychosocial and ethical issues associated with life-threatening illness, traumatic human crises, grief, and loss.
期刊最新文献
Theorizing Post-Incarceration Transition Crisis and Readiness Through Veteran Identity Work Seeking Comfort and Demanding Agency—An Autoethnographic Exploration of a Patient and Partner Experience Network Analysis of Posttraumatic Growth Dimensions: A Cross-Sectional Study in People Who Experienced the Death of a Loved One from COVID-19 in 16 Latin American Countries The Qualitative DIGNISPACE Study: The Co-Design of a Life Review, Meaning-Making and Legacy Leaving Digital Intervention for Young People with Life-Limiting Conditions The Loss of a Spouse Following an Oncological Disease: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1