Offline-verifiable Data from Distributed Ledger-based Registries

Stefan More, Jakob Heher, Clemens Walluschek
{"title":"Offline-verifiable Data from Distributed Ledger-based Registries","authors":"Stefan More, Jakob Heher, Clemens Walluschek","doi":"10.5220/0011327600003283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Trust management systems often use registries to authenticate data, or form trust decisions. Examples are revocation registries and trust status lists. By introducing distributed ledgers (DLs), it is also possible to create decentralized registries. A verifier then queries a node of the respective ledger, e.g., to retrieve trust status information during the verification of a credential. While this ensures trustworthy information, the process requires the verifier to be online and the ledger node available. Additionally, the connection from the verifier to the registry poses a privacy issue, as it leaks information about the user’s behavior. In this paper, we resolve these issues by extending existing ledger APIs to support results that are trustworthy even in an offline setting. We do this by introducing attestations of the ledger’s state, issued by ledger nodes, aggregatable into a collective attestation by all nodes. This attestation enables a user to prove the provenance of DL-based data to an offline verifier. Our approach is generic. So once deployed it serves as a basis for any use case with an offline verifier. We also provide an implementation for the Ethereum stack and evaluate it, demonstrating the practicability of our approach.","PeriodicalId":74779,"journal":{"name":"SECRYPT ... : proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Cryptography. International Conference on Security and Cryptography","volume":"25 1","pages":"687-693"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SECRYPT ... : proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Cryptography. International Conference on Security and Cryptography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0011327600003283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Trust management systems often use registries to authenticate data, or form trust decisions. Examples are revocation registries and trust status lists. By introducing distributed ledgers (DLs), it is also possible to create decentralized registries. A verifier then queries a node of the respective ledger, e.g., to retrieve trust status information during the verification of a credential. While this ensures trustworthy information, the process requires the verifier to be online and the ledger node available. Additionally, the connection from the verifier to the registry poses a privacy issue, as it leaks information about the user’s behavior. In this paper, we resolve these issues by extending existing ledger APIs to support results that are trustworthy even in an offline setting. We do this by introducing attestations of the ledger’s state, issued by ledger nodes, aggregatable into a collective attestation by all nodes. This attestation enables a user to prove the provenance of DL-based data to an offline verifier. Our approach is generic. So once deployed it serves as a basis for any use case with an offline verifier. We also provide an implementation for the Ethereum stack and evaluate it, demonstrating the practicability of our approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自基于分布式账本的注册表的离线可验证数据
信任管理系统通常使用注册中心来验证数据,或形成信任决策。例如撤销注册中心和信任状态列表。通过引入分布式账本(dl),还可以创建分散的注册表。然后,验证者查询各自分类账的节点,例如,在凭证验证期间检索信任状态信息。虽然这确保了信息的可靠性,但该过程要求验证者在线并且分类帐节点可用。此外,从验证器到注册中心的连接会带来隐私问题,因为它会泄露有关用户行为的信息。在本文中,我们通过扩展现有的分类账api来解决这些问题,以支持即使在离线设置中也值得信赖的结果。我们通过引入分类帐状态的证明来实现这一点,这些证明由分类帐节点发布,可聚合为所有节点的集体证明。此认证使用户能够向脱机验证者证明基于dl的数据的来源。我们的方法是通用的。因此,一旦部署,它就可以作为任何使用离线验证器的用例的基础。我们还为以太坊堆栈提供了一个实现并对其进行了评估,展示了我们方法的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Illicit Darkweb Classification via Natural-language Processing: Classifying Illicit Content of Webpages based on Textual Information When the Few Outweigh the Many: Illicit Content Recognition with Few-Shot Learning SQLi Detection with ML: A data-source perspective Combining Generators of Adversarial Malware Examples to Increase Evasion Rate CAPoW: Context-Aware AI-Assisted Proof of Work based DDoS Defense
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1