Zika Virus and Health Systems in Brazil: From Unknown to a Menace

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Systems & Reform Pub Date : 2016-04-02 DOI:10.1080/23288604.2016.1179085
M. Castro
{"title":"Zika Virus and Health Systems in Brazil: From Unknown to a Menace","authors":"M. Castro","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2016.1179085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Screening Criteria Medical Care for Children with Microcephaly Reproductive Health and Abortion Understanding and Communicating the Risk of Microcephaly Vector Control References In 1947, Zika virus was first identified in Uganda. On February 1, 2016, a World Health Organization (WHO) emergency committee declared clusters of birth defects suspected of being linked to an epidemic of Zika virus in the Americas as a public health emergency of international concern. The 69year period between these two events was, for the most part, uneventful with regard to research and international awareness. When the virus made its way to the Americas, however, history changed course. An association between Zika infections during pregnancy and the birth of babies with microcephaly was first suggested by Brazilian physicians in August 2015, and in November microcephaly cases potentially associated with Zika started to be recorded; three months later the WHO made its announcement. In Brazil, the country hit hardest by the epidemic so far, there have been 6,906 suspected cases of microcephaly as of April 2, 2016; 1,046 have been confirmed for microcephaly, 1,814 have been discarded, and 4,046 remain under investigation. The exact number of Zika infections in Brazil is not known, but autochthonous transmission of the virus has been confirmed in all 27 states in Brazil. In addition, as of April 7 autochthonous transmission of Zika virus has been confirmed in 34 countries/territories of the Americas. The unfolding story of Zika virus in the Americas is much more than a mosquito-borne disease that may affect fetal development. It is the story of a disease that exposed problems and raised challenges that the affected health systems and governments cannot ignore. Next, based largely on lessons provided by Brazil’s Zika epidemic, we discuss five critical problems and challenges and reflect on opportunities to remedy them.","PeriodicalId":46168,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems & Reform","volume":"67 1","pages":"119 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems & Reform","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2016.1179085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Screening Criteria Medical Care for Children with Microcephaly Reproductive Health and Abortion Understanding and Communicating the Risk of Microcephaly Vector Control References In 1947, Zika virus was first identified in Uganda. On February 1, 2016, a World Health Organization (WHO) emergency committee declared clusters of birth defects suspected of being linked to an epidemic of Zika virus in the Americas as a public health emergency of international concern. The 69year period between these two events was, for the most part, uneventful with regard to research and international awareness. When the virus made its way to the Americas, however, history changed course. An association between Zika infections during pregnancy and the birth of babies with microcephaly was first suggested by Brazilian physicians in August 2015, and in November microcephaly cases potentially associated with Zika started to be recorded; three months later the WHO made its announcement. In Brazil, the country hit hardest by the epidemic so far, there have been 6,906 suspected cases of microcephaly as of April 2, 2016; 1,046 have been confirmed for microcephaly, 1,814 have been discarded, and 4,046 remain under investigation. The exact number of Zika infections in Brazil is not known, but autochthonous transmission of the virus has been confirmed in all 27 states in Brazil. In addition, as of April 7 autochthonous transmission of Zika virus has been confirmed in 34 countries/territories of the Americas. The unfolding story of Zika virus in the Americas is much more than a mosquito-borne disease that may affect fetal development. It is the story of a disease that exposed problems and raised challenges that the affected health systems and governments cannot ignore. Next, based largely on lessons provided by Brazil’s Zika epidemic, we discuss five critical problems and challenges and reflect on opportunities to remedy them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寨卡病毒和巴西的卫生系统:从未知到威胁
小头畸形儿童的筛查标准、医疗保健、生殖健康和流产了解和沟通小头畸形病媒控制参考文献的风险1947年,寨卡病毒首次在乌干达被发现。2016年2月1日,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)突发事件委员会宣布,疑似与美洲寨卡病毒流行有关的聚集性出生缺陷事件为国际关注的突发公共卫生事件。在这两个事件之间的69年期间,就研究和国际意识而言,在很大程度上是平淡无奇的。然而,当病毒传播到美洲时,历史改变了方向。2015年8月,巴西医生首次提出怀孕期间寨卡病毒感染与小头畸形婴儿出生之间存在关联,11月开始记录可能与寨卡病毒相关的小头畸形病例;三个月后,世界卫生组织宣布了这一消息。在受疫情影响最严重的巴西,截至2016年4月2日,已有6906例疑似小头症病例;1046只被证实患有小头症,1814只被丢弃,4046只仍在调查中。巴西寨卡病毒感染的确切人数尚不清楚,但巴西所有27个州都证实了寨卡病毒的本地传播。此外,截至4月7日,在美洲34个国家/地区已确认寨卡病毒的本土传播。寨卡病毒在美洲的传播远不止是一种可能影响胎儿发育的蚊子传播疾病。这是一种疾病的故事,它暴露了受影响的卫生系统和政府不能忽视的问题和挑战。接下来,主要基于巴西寨卡疫情提供的经验教训,我们将讨论五个关键问题和挑战,并反思解决这些问题的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.80%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Strengths and Weaknesses of Strategic Health Purchasing for Universal Health Coverage in Rwanda Strategic Health Purchasing Progress Mapping: A Spotlight on Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme Strategic Health Purchasing in Nigeria: Investigating Governance and Institutional Capacities within Federal Tax-Funded Health Schemes and the Formal Sector Social Health Insurance Programme Integrating Venezuelan Migrants into the Colombian Health System during COVID-19 Decentralization Can Improve Equity, but Can It Be Sustained?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1