Strategic Health Purchasing Progress Mapping: A Spotlight on Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Systems & Reform Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1080/23288604.2022.2058337
E. Amporfu, P. Agyei-Baffour, A. Edusei, J. Novignon, Eric Arthur
{"title":"Strategic Health Purchasing Progress Mapping: A Spotlight on Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme","authors":"E. Amporfu, P. Agyei-Baffour, A. Edusei, J. Novignon, Eric Arthur","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2022.2058337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ghana is a lower-middle-income economy that has made significant efforts to improve its health system, in order to achieve universal health coverage. Ghana has adopted strategic health purchasing as an important tool for efficient utilization of resources. This paper focuses on Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) analyzing its governance arrangements and purchasing functions; and providing recommendations for improvement. The study applied the Strategic Health Purchasing Progress Tracking Framework co-created by the Strategic Purchasing Africa Resource Center (SPARC) and its partners to collect data from secondary and primary sources between September 2019 and June 2020. A descriptive and narrative approach was used to synthesize information on the NHIS governance arrangements and purchasing functions based on the framework. Benchmarks were used to describe the NHIS on the continuum from passive to strategic purchasing and to identify steps to make purchasing more strategic. Strengths and weaknesses were found in governance and purchasing functions. Progress was seen in how the NHIS selects the services in the benefit package, regularly reviewing the package to respond to the health needs of the population, and in how it selectively contracts with providers, particularly private providers, to ensure that standards for quality of care are met. However, challenges remain in performance monitoring, due to claims being mostly processed manually, and provider payment, due to frequent unbundling and upcoding of services Ghana has made significant strides toward the achievement of universal health coverage, but there is room for improvement in provider payment and performance monitoring. Video Abstract Read the transcript Lire la transcription Watch the video on Vimeo © 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor&Francis Group, LLC","PeriodicalId":46168,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems & Reform","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems & Reform","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2022.2058337","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ghana is a lower-middle-income economy that has made significant efforts to improve its health system, in order to achieve universal health coverage. Ghana has adopted strategic health purchasing as an important tool for efficient utilization of resources. This paper focuses on Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) analyzing its governance arrangements and purchasing functions; and providing recommendations for improvement. The study applied the Strategic Health Purchasing Progress Tracking Framework co-created by the Strategic Purchasing Africa Resource Center (SPARC) and its partners to collect data from secondary and primary sources between September 2019 and June 2020. A descriptive and narrative approach was used to synthesize information on the NHIS governance arrangements and purchasing functions based on the framework. Benchmarks were used to describe the NHIS on the continuum from passive to strategic purchasing and to identify steps to make purchasing more strategic. Strengths and weaknesses were found in governance and purchasing functions. Progress was seen in how the NHIS selects the services in the benefit package, regularly reviewing the package to respond to the health needs of the population, and in how it selectively contracts with providers, particularly private providers, to ensure that standards for quality of care are met. However, challenges remain in performance monitoring, due to claims being mostly processed manually, and provider payment, due to frequent unbundling and upcoding of services Ghana has made significant strides toward the achievement of universal health coverage, but there is room for improvement in provider payment and performance monitoring. Video Abstract Read the transcript Lire la transcription Watch the video on Vimeo © 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor&Francis Group, LLC
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战略医疗采购进展地图:加纳国家医疗保险计划的焦点
加纳是一个中低收入经济体,为实现全民健康覆盖,加纳在改善卫生系统方面做出了重大努力。加纳将战略性医疗采购作为有效利用资源的重要工具。本文重点分析了加纳国家健康保险计划(NHIS)的治理安排和采购功能;并提供改进建议。该研究应用了由非洲战略采购资源中心(SPARC)及其合作伙伴共同创建的战略卫生采购进度跟踪框架,从2019年9月至2020年6月期间从二级和一级来源收集数据。采用描述性和叙述性的方法综合了基于框架的NHIS治理安排和采购功能的信息。使用基准来描述NHIS从被动采购到战略采购的连续体,并确定使采购更具战略性的步骤。在治理和采购功能中发现了优势和劣势。在国家卫生保健系统如何选择一揽子福利中的服务,定期审查一揽子福利以满足人口的保健需求,以及如何有选择地与提供者,特别是私营提供者签订合同,以确保满足护理质量标准方面取得了进展。然而,在绩效监测方面仍然存在挑战,因为索赔大多是手工处理的,而在提供商支付方面,由于服务频繁分拆和升级,加纳在实现全民健康覆盖方面取得了重大进展,但在提供商支付和绩效监测方面仍有改进的空间。视频摘要阅读转录现场转录观看视频在Vimeo©2022作者(s)。由泰勒和弗朗西斯集团有限责任公司授权出版
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.80%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Strengths and Weaknesses of Strategic Health Purchasing for Universal Health Coverage in Rwanda Strategic Health Purchasing Progress Mapping: A Spotlight on Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme Strategic Health Purchasing in Nigeria: Investigating Governance and Institutional Capacities within Federal Tax-Funded Health Schemes and the Formal Sector Social Health Insurance Programme Integrating Venezuelan Migrants into the Colombian Health System during COVID-19 Decentralization Can Improve Equity, but Can It Be Sustained?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1