求助PDF
{"title":"Strategic Health Purchasing in Nigeria: Investigating Governance and Institutional Capacities within Federal Tax-Funded Health Schemes and the Formal Sector Social Health Insurance Programme","authors":"U. Ezenwaka, A. Gatome-Munyua, Chikezie Nwankwor, Nkechi Olalere, Nneka Orji, Uchenna Ewelike, B. Uzochukwu, O. Onwujekwe","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2022.2074630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT For Nigeria to make progress on its commitment to universal health coverage, additional public funding will be required. But more resources alone will not be enough. Government health spending must be more efficient and effective, through more strategic purchasing—a critical policy tool. Studies on health purchasing in Nigeria’s health financing schemes are limited, however. This study examines the purchasing arrangements in schemes funded by the federal budget and in the Formal Sector Social Health Insurance Programme (FSSHIP) within the National Health Insurance Scheme. We adopted a qualitative, descriptive case-study approach and collected data through document reviews and key informant interviews based on the Strategic Health Purchasing Progress Tracking Framework. Our analysis used a thematic framework approach. Our findings reveal that legal frameworks and governance structures for strategic purchasing are in place for both schemes. Steps toward strategic purchasing are more advanced in FSSHIP, particularly in the design of benefit packages, accreditation and monitoring of health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and providers, and provider payment mechanisms. The limited share of health funding flowing through these mechanisms, and further fragmentation of that funding, impede strategic purchasing. Strategic purchasing is also hampered by weak regulation and monitoring of providers and purchasers, delays in provider payment, and corrupt practices by HMOs. Improving strategic purchasing in Nigeria will require a concerted effort to reduce fragmentation of health spending, significant investment in human resources, technical know-how, and information systems of purchasing institutions, and actions to improve the accountability of all actors in the system. Video Abstract Read the transcript Lire la transcription Watch the video on Vimeo © 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor&Francis Group, LLC","PeriodicalId":46168,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems & Reform","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems & Reform","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2022.2074630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
引用
批量引用
尼日利亚的战略性医疗采购:调查联邦税收资助的医疗计划和正规部门社会医疗保险方案中的治理和机构能力
尼日利亚要在其全民健康覆盖承诺方面取得进展,将需要额外的公共资金。但是仅仅增加资源是不够的。政府的卫生支出必须通过更具战略性的采购——一个关键的政策工具——来提高效率和效果。然而,关于尼日利亚卫生筹资计划中医疗采购的研究有限。这项研究审查了联邦预算资助的计划和国家健康保险计划内的正式部门社会健康保险方案(FSSHIP)的采购安排。我们采用定性、描述性案例研究方法,并根据战略卫生采购进度跟踪框架,通过文件审查和关键信息提供者访谈收集数据。我们的分析使用了主题框架方法。我们的研究结果表明,战略采购的法律框架和治理结构都适用于这两种方案。FSSHIP的战略采购步骤更为先进,特别是在福利方案的设计、对健康维护组织(hmo)和提供者的认证和监测以及提供者支付机制方面。通过这些机制流动的卫生资金份额有限,而且资金进一步分散,阻碍了战略采购。对提供者和购买者的监管和监督不力、提供者付款延迟以及卫生保健组织的腐败行为也阻碍了战略采购。改善尼日利亚的战略采购将需要共同努力减少卫生支出的分散,对人力资源、技术诀窍和采购机构的信息系统进行大量投资,并采取行动改善系统中所有行为者的问责制。视频摘要阅读转录现场转录观看视频在Vimeo©2022作者(s)。由泰勒和弗朗西斯集团有限责任公司授权出版
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。