Problematyka odpowiedzialności podmiotów zbiorowych w świetle węzłowych założeń projektowanych zmian ustawy o odpowiedzialności podmiotów zbiorowych za czyny zabronione pod groźbą kary

Anna Płońska
{"title":"Problematyka odpowiedzialności podmiotów zbiorowych w świetle węzłowych założeń projektowanych zmian ustawy o odpowiedzialności podmiotów zbiorowych za czyny zabronione pod groźbą kary","authors":"Anna Płońska","doi":"10.19195/2658-1310.25.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of collectiv e entities’ liability in the light of crucial assumptionsof proposed amendments to the Act on the Liability of Collective Entitiesfor Acts Prohibited under the Threat of PenaltyPursuant to the Act of 28 October 2002 — Act on the Liability of Collective Entities for Acts Prohibited under the Threat of Penalty, a new category of liability was introduced into the Polish criminal law system. There is no doubt that in certain cases the need to punish collective entities is justified and even necessary. However, after more than 15 years of the above mentioned Act being in force, due to the low eff ectiveness of its regulations regarding collective entities’ responsibility, its amendment becomes advisable. Although at the time of writing this article, work on the amendment of the provisions on collective entities’ liability is still in progress, the main assumptions of proposed legislative changes deserve attention. The key idea of the proposed changes is to increase the effi ciency of sanctioning collective entities, especially in cases of fi scal and economic off ences. This article aims at a general overview of the proposed changes in the light of current regulations, in terms of the new collective entity legal defi nition and the principles of its liability, including penalties.","PeriodicalId":34121,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomia Spoleczna","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomia Spoleczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/2658-1310.25.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issue of collectiv e entities’ liability in the light of crucial assumptionsof proposed amendments to the Act on the Liability of Collective Entitiesfor Acts Prohibited under the Threat of PenaltyPursuant to the Act of 28 October 2002 — Act on the Liability of Collective Entities for Acts Prohibited under the Threat of Penalty, a new category of liability was introduced into the Polish criminal law system. There is no doubt that in certain cases the need to punish collective entities is justified and even necessary. However, after more than 15 years of the above mentioned Act being in force, due to the low eff ectiveness of its regulations regarding collective entities’ responsibility, its amendment becomes advisable. Although at the time of writing this article, work on the amendment of the provisions on collective entities’ liability is still in progress, the main assumptions of proposed legislative changes deserve attention. The key idea of the proposed changes is to increase the effi ciency of sanctioning collective entities, especially in cases of fi scal and economic off ences. This article aims at a general overview of the proposed changes in the light of current regulations, in terms of the new collective entity legal defi nition and the principles of its liability, including penalties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据《集体实体对处罚威胁下禁止的行为的责任法》拟议修正案的关键假设,集体实体的责任问题根据2002年10月28日《集体实体对处罚威胁下禁止的行为的责任法》,波兰刑法体系中引入了一种新的责任类别。毫无疑问,在某些情况下,惩罚集体实体的必要性是合理的,甚至是必要的。但是,在上述法案生效超过15年后,由于其关于集体实体责任的规定的有效性较低,对其进行修订是可取的。虽然在撰写本文时,关于集体实体责任条款的修正工作仍在进行中,但拟议的立法改革的主要假设值得注意。拟议改革的关键思想是提高制裁集体实体的效率,特别是在财政和经济违法的情况下。本文的目的是根据现行条例,在新的集体实体法律定义及其责任原则,包括处罚方面,对拟议的变化进行总体概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Elderly employment in the European Union: Active aging or overcoming poverty? Assessment of the performance persistence of Employee Capital Plans The losing streak of Employee Capital Plans in the pension fund market The design thinking method as an example of social innovation in action based on the case study of ProPoLab Perception of old age versus saving in Employee Capital Plans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1