Political barriers in the ratification of international commercial law conventions

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Uniform Law Review Pub Date : 2021-06-15 DOI:10.1093/ULR/UNAB003
J. Hoekstra
{"title":"Political barriers in the ratification of international commercial law conventions","authors":"J. Hoekstra","doi":"10.1093/ULR/UNAB003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article analyses the ratification of international commercial law conventions. The Convention for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) is almost 40 years old. In 2012, Switzerland proposed to the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) to evaluate the CISG and assess whether there was need for a new convention. While UNCITRAL decided not to pursue this further, the questions that Switzerland raised remain pertinent. This is not just with regard to the legal and commercial need of a new convention but also regarding the political viability of such a project. This article focuses on the latter question. It analyses the main considerations that play a part in the ratification process of international commercial law conventions. It concentrates on agenda setting and the key actors and analyses the main barriers encountered during ratification. While this article is written in the context of the aforementioned proposal, the analysis has broader applicability to the ratification process of international commercial law conventions. The main conclusions highlight the importance of raising the visibility of commercial law conventions through lobbying by key stakeholders, including trade associations, formulating agencies, and businesses. The importance of this article lies in understanding the political barriers in the ratification of international commercial law conventions.","PeriodicalId":42756,"journal":{"name":"Uniform Law Review","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uniform Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ULR/UNAB003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article analyses the ratification of international commercial law conventions. The Convention for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) is almost 40 years old. In 2012, Switzerland proposed to the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) to evaluate the CISG and assess whether there was need for a new convention. While UNCITRAL decided not to pursue this further, the questions that Switzerland raised remain pertinent. This is not just with regard to the legal and commercial need of a new convention but also regarding the political viability of such a project. This article focuses on the latter question. It analyses the main considerations that play a part in the ratification process of international commercial law conventions. It concentrates on agenda setting and the key actors and analyses the main barriers encountered during ratification. While this article is written in the context of the aforementioned proposal, the analysis has broader applicability to the ratification process of international commercial law conventions. The main conclusions highlight the importance of raising the visibility of commercial law conventions through lobbying by key stakeholders, including trade associations, formulating agencies, and businesses. The importance of this article lies in understanding the political barriers in the ratification of international commercial law conventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批准国际商法公约的政治障碍
本文分析了国际商法公约的批准问题。《国际货物销售公约》(《销售公约》)已有近40年的历史。2012年,瑞士向联合国国际贸易法委员会(贸易法委员会)提议评估《销售公约》,并评估是否需要制定一项新公约。虽然贸易法委员会决定不再进一步探讨这个问题,但瑞士提出的问题仍然具有相关性。这不仅涉及一项新公约的法律和商业需要,而且也涉及这一项目的政治可行性。本文主要讨论后一个问题。它分析了在国际商法公约批准过程中起作用的主要考虑因素。它集中讨论议程制定和关键行为体,并分析批准过程中遇到的主要障碍。虽然本文是在上述建议的背景下编写的,但分析对国际商法公约的批准程序具有更广泛的适用性。主要结论强调了通过主要利益相关者(包括贸易协会、制定机构和企业)的游说来提高商法公约知名度的重要性。本文的重要意义在于了解国际商法公约批准过程中的政治障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Interpretation and application of the CISG by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia: an analysis of the judgment in the Boom Conveyor case Electronic enforcement in the digital era: Themis without a sword The Unidroit Principles and the Shari’ah Standards: any room for cooperation? Dealing with registrations and jurisdiction in aircraft financing Revolutionizing trade finance: leveraging the power of blockchain and AI in electronic letters of credit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1