Analysis of the spatial inequality in residential quality indicators: the 22 urban regions of Tehran Metropolis

Moslem Zarghamfard, Behnaz Bahadori, Robab Hoseinzadeh, Esmaiel Safaralizadeh
{"title":"Analysis of the spatial inequality in residential quality indicators: the 22 urban regions of Tehran Metropolis","authors":"Moslem Zarghamfard, Behnaz Bahadori, Robab Hoseinzadeh, Esmaiel Safaralizadeh","doi":"10.12775/bgss-2023-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research objective: the present study seeks to assess and analyze the status of residential quality indicators in the 22 urban regions of the Tehran metropolis. \nMethodology: 79 residential quality variables are classified into the four indicators of physical, economic, ecological, and socio-cultural indices. Shannon entropy model, the coefficient of variation, TOPSIS, hotspot analysis, and Moran spatial autocorrelation were used for data analysis. \nResults: Results of the present study indicated a TOPSIS score of 0.58 for the integrated indicators which revealed region 1 had the best and region 15 had the worst status. In fact, a sort of divergence and heterogeneity rules residential quality indicators in Tehran urban regions, so that among the 22 urban regions of the city, around 4.5% were advantaged while 13.6% were relatively advantaged, 77.3% were semi- advantaged, and 4.5% were less advantaged. Results of statistical spatial analysis also indicate that the advantaged clusters were located in northern and northeastern parts of the city while the less advantaged and extremely less advantaged clusters were more focused in the southern and southeastern parts of the city, and residential quality indicators followed a cluster pattern. \nConclusion: A spatial difference and inequality in residential quality index distribution were observed in the 22 urban regions of Tehran so that the regions located in the southern and southeastern parts of the city had an unfavorable status in terms of residential quality indicators while the northern and northeastern regions were more advantaged in this regard. ","PeriodicalId":45441,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Geography-Socio-Economic Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Geography-Socio-Economic Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2023-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research objective: the present study seeks to assess and analyze the status of residential quality indicators in the 22 urban regions of the Tehran metropolis. Methodology: 79 residential quality variables are classified into the four indicators of physical, economic, ecological, and socio-cultural indices. Shannon entropy model, the coefficient of variation, TOPSIS, hotspot analysis, and Moran spatial autocorrelation were used for data analysis. Results: Results of the present study indicated a TOPSIS score of 0.58 for the integrated indicators which revealed region 1 had the best and region 15 had the worst status. In fact, a sort of divergence and heterogeneity rules residential quality indicators in Tehran urban regions, so that among the 22 urban regions of the city, around 4.5% were advantaged while 13.6% were relatively advantaged, 77.3% were semi- advantaged, and 4.5% were less advantaged. Results of statistical spatial analysis also indicate that the advantaged clusters were located in northern and northeastern parts of the city while the less advantaged and extremely less advantaged clusters were more focused in the southern and southeastern parts of the city, and residential quality indicators followed a cluster pattern. Conclusion: A spatial difference and inequality in residential quality index distribution were observed in the 22 urban regions of Tehran so that the regions located in the southern and southeastern parts of the city had an unfavorable status in terms of residential quality indicators while the northern and northeastern regions were more advantaged in this regard. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
居住质量指标的空间不平等分析:德黑兰大都市22个城区
研究目的:本研究旨在评估和分析德黑兰大都市22个城市区域的居住质量指标状况。方法:将79个居住质量变量分为物理、经济、生态和社会文化四个指标。采用Shannon熵模型、变异系数、TOPSIS、热点分析和Moran空间自相关等方法对数据进行分析。结果:综合指标TOPSIS得分为0.58,区域1状况最好,区域15状况最差。事实上,德黑兰城市区域的居住质量指标存在某种差异和异质性,因此在该市的22个城市区域中,约4.5%的城市区域处于优越状态,13.6%的城市区域处于相对优越状态,77.3%的城市区域处于半优越状态,4.5%的城市区域处于较差状态。统计空间分析结果还表明,优势集聚区主要分布在城市北部和东北部,欠发达和极度欠发达集聚区主要集中在城市南部和东南部,居住质量指标呈集聚型分布。结论:德黑兰22个城区的居住质量指数分布存在空间差异和不平等,位于城市南部和东南部的地区在居住质量指标方面处于不利地位,而北部和东北部地区在居住质量指标方面处于有利地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
30
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
What drives them to drive? Mode choice for holiday travel in Poland and its determinants On household living conditions. A comparison between capital agglomerations and their popular neighborhoods in Northwestern Argentina Factors associated with rural aging in Brazilian municipalities: an analysis using quantile regressions Analysis of delays and cost overruns of road construction projects in the Colombian Caribbean Region Recent developments in immigration patterns. A case study in the province of Malaga (Spain)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1