Maximising health outcomes

A. Papageorghiou
{"title":"Maximising health outcomes","authors":"A. Papageorghiou","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020, I wrote an editorial in this Journal on social determinants of health, defined by the WHO as “The conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age” (BJOG. 2020;127(4):431–2). Therefore, I am really pleased that in this issue we are able to give our readers a highly relevant Scientific Impact Paper on precisely this subject. It aims to inform all of us about the relationship between social determinants of health and the risk of maternal death. The paper is written on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and for this reason it has a UK focus, but anyone who reads it will see that the extensive literature review and recommendations are of relevance everywhere. Social determinants have a strong inf luence on a person's health and it is crucial to understand and appreciate that this remains the case even within a public health system such as the UK National Health Service (NHS), where reproductive and maternity services are provided for free. The COVID pandemic clearly meets the criteria and definition of an important Social Determinant of Health. In this issue, Davies and colleagues (1133–1139) present data on the effects of the pandemic on the diagnosis of cervical cancer, from six major cancer centres in the North of England. They observed a reduction in cancer diagnoses (by 25%) when comparing data from May to October 2020 to a similar period in 2019. Sadly, these data do not suggest a reduction in cancer: rather they are due to early disease that has gone undetected during the pandemic. The authors use these observations to develop forecasts, also taking into account the temporary cessation in screening during the pandemic; these projections suggest there will be a significant increase in cervical cancer cases presenting over the next 3 years. Usefully, the authors also suggest what changes are required (including increases in surgical capacity) to deal with this increase, and demonstrate that associated morbidity or mortality could be mitigated. The associated minicommentary by Leslie Massad (1140) brilliantly explains how the pandemic is likely to disrupt cervical cancer prevention efforts well into the future and highlights the need for health DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17196","PeriodicalId":8984,"journal":{"name":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2020, I wrote an editorial in this Journal on social determinants of health, defined by the WHO as “The conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age” (BJOG. 2020;127(4):431–2). Therefore, I am really pleased that in this issue we are able to give our readers a highly relevant Scientific Impact Paper on precisely this subject. It aims to inform all of us about the relationship between social determinants of health and the risk of maternal death. The paper is written on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and for this reason it has a UK focus, but anyone who reads it will see that the extensive literature review and recommendations are of relevance everywhere. Social determinants have a strong inf luence on a person's health and it is crucial to understand and appreciate that this remains the case even within a public health system such as the UK National Health Service (NHS), where reproductive and maternity services are provided for free. The COVID pandemic clearly meets the criteria and definition of an important Social Determinant of Health. In this issue, Davies and colleagues (1133–1139) present data on the effects of the pandemic on the diagnosis of cervical cancer, from six major cancer centres in the North of England. They observed a reduction in cancer diagnoses (by 25%) when comparing data from May to October 2020 to a similar period in 2019. Sadly, these data do not suggest a reduction in cancer: rather they are due to early disease that has gone undetected during the pandemic. The authors use these observations to develop forecasts, also taking into account the temporary cessation in screening during the pandemic; these projections suggest there will be a significant increase in cervical cancer cases presenting over the next 3 years. Usefully, the authors also suggest what changes are required (including increases in surgical capacity) to deal with this increase, and demonstrate that associated morbidity or mortality could be mitigated. The associated minicommentary by Leslie Massad (1140) brilliantly explains how the pandemic is likely to disrupt cervical cancer prevention efforts well into the future and highlights the need for health DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17196
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最大限度提高健康成果
2020年,我在本刊撰写了一篇关于健康的社会决定因素的社论,世卫组织将其定义为“人们出生、成长、生活、工作和衰老的条件”(BJOG)。127(4): 431 - 2020; 2)。因此,我真的很高兴在这一期我们能够给我们的读者提供一篇高度相关的科学影响论文,正是关于这个主题。它旨在使我们所有人了解健康的社会决定因素与孕产妇死亡风险之间的关系。这篇论文是代表皇家妇产科学院撰写的,因此它的重点是英国,但任何读过它的人都会发现,广泛的文献综述和建议在任何地方都是相关的。社会决定因素对一个人的健康有很大的影响,理解和认识到这一点至关重要,即使在公共卫生系统内,如英国国家卫生服务体系(NHS),生殖和产妇服务是免费提供的。COVID - 19大流行显然符合健康重要社会决定因素的标准和定义。在这一期中,Davies和他的同事(1133-1139)提供了来自英格兰北部六个主要癌症中心的关于大流行对宫颈癌诊断影响的数据。在将2020年5月至10月的数据与2019年同期的数据进行比较时,他们观察到癌症诊断减少了(25%)。令人遗憾的是,这些数据并没有表明癌症发病率有所下降,而是由于在大流行期间未被发现的早期疾病。作者利用这些观察结果进行预测,同时也考虑到大流行期间筛查的暂时停止;这些预测显示,在未来三年,子宫颈癌病例将显著增加。有用的是,作者还建议需要哪些改变(包括手术能力的增加)来应对这种增加,并证明相关的发病率或死亡率可以减轻。Leslie Massad(1140)的相关迷你评论精彩地解释了这场大流行如何可能在未来很长一段时间内破坏宫颈癌的预防工作,并强调了健康的必要性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parents', Families', Communities' and Healthcare Professionals' Experiences of Care Following Neonatal Death in Healthcare Facilities in LMICs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography. Birth Outcomes After Pertussis and Influenza Diagnosed in Pregnancy: A Retrospective, Population-Based Study. Maternal Lipids in Pregnancy and Later Life Dyslipidemia: The POUCHmoms Longitudinal Cohort Study. Unpacking the Complex Relationship Between Postpartum Haemorrhage and Cardiovascular Disease A Comment on Green Top Guideline No. 31: Investigating and Care in the Small-For-Gestational-Age and Growth Restricted Foetus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1