Evaluation of Compilers Effects on OpenMP Soft Error Resiliency

Jonas Gava, Vitor V. Bandeira, R. Reis, Luciano Ost
{"title":"Evaluation of Compilers Effects on OpenMP Soft Error Resiliency","authors":"Jonas Gava, Vitor V. Bandeira, R. Reis, Luciano Ost","doi":"10.1109/ISVLSI.2019.00055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software engineers are using different compilers and parallel programming models (e.g., Pthreads, OpenMP) to take the best performance offered by multicore systems. Both programming models and compilers have specific characteristics, which directly impact on applications code footprint, performance, power-efficiency and reliability. The occurrence of soft errors in multicore systems is a growing reliability issue in several domains (e.g., automotive, medical, avionics). In this scenario, this paper investigates the impact of widely adopted compilers on the soft error reliability of applications implemented with OpenMP library. Fault injection campaigns consider 3 open-source compilers (GNU/GCC 5.5.0, 7.3.1, Clang 6.0.1), 16 OpenMP benchmarks executing on single, dual and quad-core versions of the Arm Cortex-A72 processor. Results show that, on average, Clang is 15.85% more reliable than both versions of GCC, which demonstrate to be more sensitive to the optimisation flags when compared to Clang.","PeriodicalId":6703,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI)","volume":"26 1","pages":"259-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISVLSI.2019.00055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Software engineers are using different compilers and parallel programming models (e.g., Pthreads, OpenMP) to take the best performance offered by multicore systems. Both programming models and compilers have specific characteristics, which directly impact on applications code footprint, performance, power-efficiency and reliability. The occurrence of soft errors in multicore systems is a growing reliability issue in several domains (e.g., automotive, medical, avionics). In this scenario, this paper investigates the impact of widely adopted compilers on the soft error reliability of applications implemented with OpenMP library. Fault injection campaigns consider 3 open-source compilers (GNU/GCC 5.5.0, 7.3.1, Clang 6.0.1), 16 OpenMP benchmarks executing on single, dual and quad-core versions of the Arm Cortex-A72 processor. Results show that, on average, Clang is 15.85% more reliable than both versions of GCC, which demonstrate to be more sensitive to the optimisation flags when compared to Clang.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估编译器对OpenMP软错误弹性的影响
软件工程师正在使用不同的编译器和并行编程模型(例如,Pthreads, OpenMP)来获得多核系统提供的最佳性能。编程模型和编译器都有特定的特性,这些特性直接影响到应用程序的代码占用、性能、能效和可靠性。在多个领域(如汽车、医疗、航空电子),多核系统中出现软错误是一个日益严重的可靠性问题。在这种情况下,本文研究了广泛采用的编译器对使用OpenMP库实现的应用程序的软错误可靠性的影响。故障注入活动考虑3个开源编译器(GNU/GCC 5.5.0, 7.3.1, Clang 6.0.1), 16个OpenMP基准测试,在单核,双核和四核版本的Arm Cortex-A72处理器上执行。结果显示,平均而言,Clang的可靠性比两个版本的GCC都高15.85%,这表明与Clang相比,Clang对优化标志更加敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ferroelectric FET Based TCAM Designs for Energy Efficient Computing Evaluation of Compilers Effects on OpenMP Soft Error Resiliency Towards Efficient Compact Network Training on Edge-Devices PageCmp: Bandwidth Efficient Page Deduplication through In-memory Page Comparison Improving Logic Optimization in Sequential Circuits using Majority-inverter Graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1