Gender in the Australian innovation ecosystem: planning smart cities for men

Sophia Maalsen, Peta Wolifson, R. Dowling
{"title":"Gender in the Australian innovation ecosystem: planning smart cities for men","authors":"Sophia Maalsen, Peta Wolifson, R. Dowling","doi":"10.1080/0966369X.2022.2053068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The affinity for tech-driven solutions of ‘smart cities’ has been critiqued at length, as has the gender disparity in technology firms. This paper draws these literatures together along with our own data on Australia’s innovation economy – one that includes its spaces (incubators, accelerators and co-working hubs), events (‘hackathons’), and places (innovation districts). These three components are ubiquitous among smart city strategies across all levels of government. In this paper we examine the gendered landscape of the innovation economy and the strategic urban agenda to which it is tied. The paper draws on data collected through interviews conducted with women entrepreneurs around their experiences in Australia’s innovation economy. Drawing from policy documents and further interviews, our discussion mirrors their vignettes with an examination of the three innovation economy components using case studies from Australian smart city planning. In doing so, we illuminate how the gendered experiences of women in the innovation economy are entwined with the smart urbanism imperatives of high-growth, technology-focus, and the attraction of ‘talent’. Existing attempts to grapple with discrimination in the innovation economy are shown to reinforce gendered hierarchies, resulting in ‘smart cities’ designed for men. We argue that the gendered nature of the tech industries that underpin the innovation economy has implications for who the smart city is for.","PeriodicalId":12513,"journal":{"name":"Gender, Place & Culture","volume":"141 1","pages":"299 - 320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender, Place & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2022.2053068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The affinity for tech-driven solutions of ‘smart cities’ has been critiqued at length, as has the gender disparity in technology firms. This paper draws these literatures together along with our own data on Australia’s innovation economy – one that includes its spaces (incubators, accelerators and co-working hubs), events (‘hackathons’), and places (innovation districts). These three components are ubiquitous among smart city strategies across all levels of government. In this paper we examine the gendered landscape of the innovation economy and the strategic urban agenda to which it is tied. The paper draws on data collected through interviews conducted with women entrepreneurs around their experiences in Australia’s innovation economy. Drawing from policy documents and further interviews, our discussion mirrors their vignettes with an examination of the three innovation economy components using case studies from Australian smart city planning. In doing so, we illuminate how the gendered experiences of women in the innovation economy are entwined with the smart urbanism imperatives of high-growth, technology-focus, and the attraction of ‘talent’. Existing attempts to grapple with discrimination in the innovation economy are shown to reinforce gendered hierarchies, resulting in ‘smart cities’ designed for men. We argue that the gendered nature of the tech industries that underpin the innovation economy has implications for who the smart city is for.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚创新生态系统中的性别:为男性规划智慧城市
“智慧城市”对技术驱动解决方案的亲和力受到了详细的批评,科技公司的性别差异也受到了批评。本文将这些文献与我们自己关于澳大利亚创新经济的数据结合在一起,包括其空间(孵化器、加速器和联合工作中心)、活动(“黑客马拉松”)和地点(创新区)。这三个组成部分在各级政府的智慧城市战略中无处不在。在本文中,我们研究了创新经济的性别景观和与之相关的战略城市议程。这篇论文利用了对女性企业家的访谈收集的数据,这些访谈围绕着她们在澳大利亚创新经济中的经历展开。根据政策文件和进一步的采访,我们的讨论反映了他们的小插曲,并使用澳大利亚智慧城市规划的案例研究来研究创新经济的三个组成部分。在此过程中,我们阐明了女性在创新经济中的性别经历是如何与高增长、以技术为中心和吸引“人才”的智慧城市主义必要性交织在一起的。现有的解决创新经济中歧视的尝试被证明强化了性别等级制度,导致了为男性设计的“智慧城市”。我们认为,支撑创新经济的科技行业的性别性质对智慧城市的服务对象有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closedness and openness in Tehran; a feminist critique of Sennett Gendering the BRI: a viewpoint The gendered body during Covid-19: views from Australia, the United Kingdom, and Japan - Introduction to themed section (Re)making live-in or live-out choice: the lived experience of Filipina migrant domestic workers in Macao Gendered experiences during COVID-19 in Turkey and the meaning of home
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1