Platinum-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and Stage III Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung.

T. Isaka, H. Nakayama, T. Yokose, H. Ito, K. Katayama, Kouzo Yamada, M. Masuda
{"title":"Platinum-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and Stage III Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung.","authors":"T. Isaka, H. Nakayama, T. Yokose, H. Ito, K. Katayama, Kouzo Yamada, M. Masuda","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThe efficacy of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (PBAC) for pathological stage II and stage III squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung was analyzed retrospectively.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThe prognoses of 94 patients with stage II and stage III SCC with or without PBAC (more than three courses of cisplatin-, carboplatin-, and nedaplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy) were compared.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe mean observation period was 46.1 months. PBAC was not administered for the following reasons: 39 (55.7%) patients had comorbidities, 25 (35.7%) were older than 75 years, 19 (27.1%) patients underwent surgery before the approval of PBAC, and 3 (4.3%) patients could not continue PBAC (≤2 cycles) because of adverse events. PBAC patients (n = 24) were significantly younger than non-PBAC patients (n = 70; 66.3 vs 69.6 years old, respectively; p = 0.043). Disease-free survival (DFS) did not differ between PBAC and non-PBAC patients (55.0% and 67.1%, respectively; p = 0.266). PBAC patients tended to have worse overall survival (OS) than non-PBAC patients (56.1% and 70.2%, respectively; p = 0.138). PBAC was not prognostic for OS (hazard ratio (HR), 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82%-5.40%; p = 0.120).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPBAC did not improve the prognoses of patients with pathological stage II or stage III SCC in the single institution experience.","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The efficacy of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (PBAC) for pathological stage II and stage III squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung was analyzed retrospectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS The prognoses of 94 patients with stage II and stage III SCC with or without PBAC (more than three courses of cisplatin-, carboplatin-, and nedaplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy) were compared. RESULTS The mean observation period was 46.1 months. PBAC was not administered for the following reasons: 39 (55.7%) patients had comorbidities, 25 (35.7%) were older than 75 years, 19 (27.1%) patients underwent surgery before the approval of PBAC, and 3 (4.3%) patients could not continue PBAC (≤2 cycles) because of adverse events. PBAC patients (n = 24) were significantly younger than non-PBAC patients (n = 70; 66.3 vs 69.6 years old, respectively; p = 0.043). Disease-free survival (DFS) did not differ between PBAC and non-PBAC patients (55.0% and 67.1%, respectively; p = 0.266). PBAC patients tended to have worse overall survival (OS) than non-PBAC patients (56.1% and 70.2%, respectively; p = 0.138). PBAC was not prognostic for OS (hazard ratio (HR), 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82%-5.40%; p = 0.120). CONCLUSION PBAC did not improve the prognoses of patients with pathological stage II or stage III SCC in the single institution experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铂基辅助化疗治疗II期和III期肺鳞状细胞癌。
回顾性分析铂基辅助化疗(PBAC)治疗病理II期和III期肺鳞癌(SCC)的疗效。材料和方法对94例II期和III期SCC患者的预后进行比较,这些患者有或没有PBAC(超过三个疗程的顺铂、卡铂和奈达铂辅助化疗)。结果平均观察期46.1个月。未给予PBAC的原因如下:39例(55.7%)患者有合并症,25例(35.7%)患者年龄大于75岁,19例(27.1%)患者在PBAC批准前接受过手术,3例(4.3%)患者因不良事件无法继续PBAC(≤2个周期)。PBAC患者(n = 24)明显比非PBAC患者(n = 70;分别为66.3岁和69.6岁;P = 0.043)。PBAC和非PBAC患者的无病生存率(DFS)无差异(分别为55.0%和67.1%;P = 0.266)。PBAC患者的总生存期(OS)往往比非PBAC患者差(分别为56.1%和70.2%;P = 0.138)。PBAC与OS无预后关系(风险比(HR), 2.11;95%置信区间(CI), 0.82% ~ 5.40%;P = 0.120)。结论:在单一机构的经验中,pbac并没有改善病理性II期或III期SCC患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lateral Dorsal Basal Lung Resection Based on Functional Preserving Sublobectomy Method: Single-Center Experience. A Novel Method of Real-Time Assessment for Coronary Artery Anastomosis Skill. Can Open Distal Repair Be Safely Used in All Patients with Type A Acute Aortic Dissection? Long-Term Outcomes of Simple Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Based on the Initial Aortic Diameter. Total Arterial Revascularization: Evaluating the Length of the Radial Artery in a Composite Graft Configuration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1