The Role of “Relational Reflexivity” in Family Relationships: a Case Study on the Example of Two Young Couples

Nina Lyubinarskaya
{"title":"The Role of “Relational Reflexivity” in Family Relationships: a Case Study on the Example of Two Young Couples","authors":"Nina Lyubinarskaya","doi":"10.19181/inter.2022.14.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the dynamics of the relationship of spouses and reveals the role of “relational reflexivity” on the example of interviews with two young families conducted in 2019 and 2021. The study based on the assumption that relational reflexivity plays a significant role in the stability of family relationships: its presence can strengthen them, and its absence can lead to a crisis in the family or to divorce. According on the results of comparing the narratives of two couples, changes in relational reflexivity in each family over time. We trace these changes through the analysis of the respondents’ narratives which we will explain through the category’s relational reflexivity — “self-detachment” and “relational steering” which create a “sense of us” using the methodology of the already existing research in the field of family sociology researchers Donati, Moscatelli, Ferrari, Paris, etc. In their work, the researchers rely on relational theory of sociologists Donati and Archer and argue that for the emergence of “relational reflexivity” in the family, it is necessary to take into account two states of individuals in a pair — “ability to manage relationships” (relational steering) and “distance from oneself” (self-detachment), which allow relationships to be resilient to the hardships of family life by constructing a “we-relation”. Thus, the strength of an alliance may depend on the response to external circumstances, how decisions are made and how destabilizing situations are resolved. The opposite of “relational reflexivity” can be “individualism”. In Archer and Donati's logic of reflexive relations, individualism has similarities with “autonomous reflexivity”, for which it is important to focus on “I” and not “We”. Thus, excessive individualism in a couple can create precedents for ignoring the joint difficulties that arise in the life of each partner, and create difficulties in managing relationships, which in the future can lead to a crisis in the family and affect the joint future.","PeriodicalId":81563,"journal":{"name":"Inter-Nord","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inter-Nord","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2022.14.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyzes the dynamics of the relationship of spouses and reveals the role of “relational reflexivity” on the example of interviews with two young families conducted in 2019 and 2021. The study based on the assumption that relational reflexivity plays a significant role in the stability of family relationships: its presence can strengthen them, and its absence can lead to a crisis in the family or to divorce. According on the results of comparing the narratives of two couples, changes in relational reflexivity in each family over time. We trace these changes through the analysis of the respondents’ narratives which we will explain through the category’s relational reflexivity — “self-detachment” and “relational steering” which create a “sense of us” using the methodology of the already existing research in the field of family sociology researchers Donati, Moscatelli, Ferrari, Paris, etc. In their work, the researchers rely on relational theory of sociologists Donati and Archer and argue that for the emergence of “relational reflexivity” in the family, it is necessary to take into account two states of individuals in a pair — “ability to manage relationships” (relational steering) and “distance from oneself” (self-detachment), which allow relationships to be resilient to the hardships of family life by constructing a “we-relation”. Thus, the strength of an alliance may depend on the response to external circumstances, how decisions are made and how destabilizing situations are resolved. The opposite of “relational reflexivity” can be “individualism”. In Archer and Donati's logic of reflexive relations, individualism has similarities with “autonomous reflexivity”, for which it is important to focus on “I” and not “We”. Thus, excessive individualism in a couple can create precedents for ignoring the joint difficulties that arise in the life of each partner, and create difficulties in managing relationships, which in the future can lead to a crisis in the family and affect the joint future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“关系反身性”在家庭关系中的作用——以两对年轻夫妇为例
本文以2019年和2021年对两个年轻家庭的访谈为例,分析了配偶关系的动态,揭示了“关系反身性”的作用。这项研究基于这样一个假设,即关系反身性在家庭关系的稳定中起着重要作用:它的存在可以加强家庭关系,而它的缺失可能导致家庭危机或离婚。根据比较两对夫妇的叙述的结果,每个家庭的关系反射随时间的变化。我们通过对受访者叙述的分析来追踪这些变化,我们将通过类别的关系反思性——“自我超脱”和“关系导向”来解释这些变化,这些反思性创造了一种“我们的感觉”,使用的是家庭社会学研究人员Donati、Moscatelli、Ferrari、Paris等人的研究方法。在他们的工作中,研究人员依靠社会学家Donati和Archer的关系理论,认为对于家庭中“关系反身性”的出现,有必要考虑到一对个体的两种状态——“管理关系的能力”(关系导向)和“与自己的距离”(自我超然),这使得关系能够通过构建“我们的关系”来适应家庭生活的艰辛。因此,联盟的力量可能取决于对外部环境的反应,如何做出决策以及如何解决不稳定的情况。“关系反身性”的反义词可以是“个人主义”。在Archer和Donati的反身关系逻辑中,个人主义与“自主反身性”有相似之处,重要的是关注“我”而不是“我们”。因此,一对夫妇中过度的个人主义可以为忽视每个伴侣生活中出现的共同困难创造先例,并在管理关系方面创造困难,这在未来可能导致家庭危机并影响共同的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Online Focus-Groups: Methodical Reflection Experimental Art-Based Formats as the Creative Practices of Teaching Sociology Therapeutic Discourse of Psychologists in the Context of Crisis: Normalization of Non-Action Quality Textbooks for Quality Research (Not)New Questions in New Contexts (Methodological and Ethical Problems in the Studies of Refugees From Ukraine)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1