Online Focus-Groups: Methodical Reflection

Maria Zheliznyk
{"title":"Online Focus-Groups: Methodical Reflection","authors":"Maria Zheliznyk","doi":"10.19181/inter.2023.15.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digitalization process transforms ways of social reality research. Since the late nineties of the last century online methods have become popular, classical research methods have been digitized, the natively digital methods have emerged, for example, asynchronous online focus groups. The pandemic has led to a rapid increase of popularity of online-methods in Russia, in particular online focus groups have become in demand by the market. Despite the removal of COVID restrictions, online focus groups have remained popular. In this article we consider the changed social reality, analyze specifics in the organization and conduct of online focus groups on the example of Leningrad Region. We demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of this method, comprehend the factors that may lead to sample bias in organizing online focus groups, present our results in the field of organization and conduct of focus groups on the Internet. The presented arguments provide a more complex framework for researchers, and especially early career researchers, to make a reasoned and balanced decision when selecting between face-to-face and digital modes.","PeriodicalId":81563,"journal":{"name":"Inter-Nord","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inter-Nord","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2023.15.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The digitalization process transforms ways of social reality research. Since the late nineties of the last century online methods have become popular, classical research methods have been digitized, the natively digital methods have emerged, for example, asynchronous online focus groups. The pandemic has led to a rapid increase of popularity of online-methods in Russia, in particular online focus groups have become in demand by the market. Despite the removal of COVID restrictions, online focus groups have remained popular. In this article we consider the changed social reality, analyze specifics in the organization and conduct of online focus groups on the example of Leningrad Region. We demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of this method, comprehend the factors that may lead to sample bias in organizing online focus groups, present our results in the field of organization and conduct of focus groups on the Internet. The presented arguments provide a more complex framework for researchers, and especially early career researchers, to make a reasoned and balanced decision when selecting between face-to-face and digital modes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线焦点小组:有条不紊的反思
数字化进程改变了社会现实研究的方式。自上世纪九十年代末以来,在线方法开始流行,经典的研究方法被数字化,原生的数字化方法出现了,例如异步在线焦点小组。疫情导致在线方法在俄罗斯迅速普及,特别是在线焦点小组已成为市场需求。尽管取消了对COVID的限制,但在线焦点小组仍然很受欢迎。本文结合社会现实的变化,以列宁格勒地区为例,分析了网络焦点小组组织与开展的具体情况。我们论证了这种方法的优点和缺点,理解了在组织在线焦点小组时可能导致样本偏差的因素,展示了我们在互联网上组织和开展焦点小组领域的研究成果。提出的论点为研究人员,特别是早期职业研究人员提供了一个更复杂的框架,以便在面对面和数字模式之间进行选择时做出合理和平衡的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Online Focus-Groups: Methodical Reflection Experimental Art-Based Formats as the Creative Practices of Teaching Sociology Therapeutic Discourse of Psychologists in the Context of Crisis: Normalization of Non-Action Quality Textbooks for Quality Research (Not)New Questions in New Contexts (Methodological and Ethical Problems in the Studies of Refugees From Ukraine)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1