A systemic functional analysis of the “ngp1 + vgp + ngp2 + ngp3” construction in English

Guowen Huang, Ruihua Zhao
{"title":"A systemic functional analysis of the “ngp1 + vgp + ngp2 + ngp3” construction in English","authors":"Guowen Huang, Ruihua Zhao","doi":"10.1515/jwl-2021-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The literature to date features two very different approaches to the study of syntax, the formal or structure-based approach and the functional or semantics-based approach, both of which have advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the “ngp1 + vgp + ngp2 + ngp3” construction in English by identifying the relationship between the clausal elements in terms of clause types. The theoretical support is Systemic Functional Linguistics which is semantics-based and which regards form/structure as the realization of meaning/semantics. Specifically, the paper discusses the issue by keeping in mind questions such as “What kind of process is it?”, “How many participants can/must be involved in the process?”, and “What roles can/must those participants play?”. By analyzing three pairs of clauses that share the same “ngp1 + vgp + ngp2 + ngp3” structure, it is found that the clause types SVOO, SOVA, SVOC, and SVO all exhibit the same “ngp1 + vgp + ngp2 + ngp3” structure. The identification of the clause types is conducted by examining the Process in the Transitivity system of the clause. The implication of the present study is that a functional-syntactic analysis should start from meaning and consider how the meaning is realized and that although syntactic analysis at the level of form is necessary, the focus of a good functional-syntactic analysis should be based on semantic analysis at the level of meaning.","PeriodicalId":93793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of world languages","volume":"18 1","pages":"223 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of world languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The literature to date features two very different approaches to the study of syntax, the formal or structure-based approach and the functional or semantics-based approach, both of which have advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the “ngp1 + vgp + ngp2 + ngp3” construction in English by identifying the relationship between the clausal elements in terms of clause types. The theoretical support is Systemic Functional Linguistics which is semantics-based and which regards form/structure as the realization of meaning/semantics. Specifically, the paper discusses the issue by keeping in mind questions such as “What kind of process is it?”, “How many participants can/must be involved in the process?”, and “What roles can/must those participants play?”. By analyzing three pairs of clauses that share the same “ngp1 + vgp + ngp2 + ngp3” structure, it is found that the clause types SVOO, SOVA, SVOC, and SVO all exhibit the same “ngp1 + vgp + ngp2 + ngp3” structure. The identification of the clause types is conducted by examining the Process in the Transitivity system of the clause. The implication of the present study is that a functional-syntactic analysis should start from meaning and consider how the meaning is realized and that although syntactic analysis at the level of form is necessary, the focus of a good functional-syntactic analysis should be based on semantic analysis at the level of meaning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语“ngp1 + vgp + ngp2 + ngp3”结构的系统功能分析
迄今为止,文献中有两种截然不同的语法研究方法,即基于形式或结构的方法和基于功能或语义的方法,两者都有各自的优点和缺点。本文的目的是研究英语中的“ngp1 + vgp + ngp2 + ngp3”结构,从子句类型的角度来识别小句要素之间的关系。系统功能语言学以语义学为基础,将形式/结构视为意义/语义的实现。具体来说,本文通过记住诸如“它是什么样的过程?”、“这个过程中可以/必须有多少参与者?”以及“这些参与者可以/必须扮演什么角色?”通过对三对具有相同“ngp1 + vgp + ngp2 + ngp3”结构的子句进行分析,发现SVOO、SOVA、SVOC和SVO都具有相同的“ngp1 + vgp + ngp2 + ngp3”结构。子句类型的识别是通过检查子句及物系统中的过程来进行的。本研究的启示是,功能句法分析应从意义出发,考虑意义是如何实现的,虽然形式层面的句法分析是必要的,但好的功能句法分析的重点应以意义层面的语义分析为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anastazija Kirkova-Naskova, Alice Henderson & Jonás Fouz-González (eds.). 2021. English pronunciation instruction: Research-based insights. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. xix+388 pp. ISBN: 978-90-272-0935-1(hbk) J. R. Martin, Beatriz Quiroz & Pin Wang. 2023. Systemic functional grammar: A text-based description of English, Spanish and Chinese Arran Stibbe. 2024. Econarrative: Ethics, ecology, and the search for new narratives to live by. London: Bloomsbury, x+278pp. ISBN: 978-1-3502-6312-3 (hbk) Positive discourse analysis of Aotearoa New Zealand Foreign Minister’s speeches: an ecolinguistic perspective “Spoken and monologic”: modelling oratory, past and present, through the framework of systemic functional linguistics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1