Geopolitical Thinking behind the US Policy-Making toward China and the Diplomatic Choice of Japan

Lian Degui
{"title":"Geopolitical Thinking behind the US Policy-Making toward China and the Diplomatic Choice of Japan","authors":"Lian Degui","doi":"10.1142/s2737557921500108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The roots of US policy toward China are laid in the geopolitical thinking mode of its strategic culture. This mode of thinking first originated in Britain and later evolved into geopolitics. Bearing such thoughts, the United States sees China as a country at the southeastern rim of the Eurasian continent, and the rise of China is a threat to its dominance as a maritime state in the Eurasian continent. No matter the rotation of governing parties in the United States, containing the development of China is not merely an expedient for electoral politics but an inevitable choice for maritime states to contain continental states and an objectively necessary national security strategy aimed at retaining the global hegemony of the United States. As China further develops, such intention will become more and more apparent. In order to achieve the goal of slowing down China’s development pace and maintaining US’s political dominance over Eurasia, it seems that the United States has to build a maritime alliance system. The alliance between Japan and the United States will be further strengthened since Japan is a strategic pivot of this system. However, Japan’s perception of interests and strategic thinking are not fully aligned with those of the United States, and as a result, Japan will choose strategies with a certain degree of autonomy, thus eventually limiting the implementation of US’s geopolitical strategies. From the viewpoints of power transfer, geopolitics and ideology for the confrontation between maritime and continental states, this paper focuses on the limitations of the geopolitical thinking behind US’s policy-making toward China and the relatively autonomous strategy of Japan to analyze the status quo and underlying trends of China–US–Japan relations.","PeriodicalId":85727,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of East Asian affairs","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of East Asian affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2737557921500108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The roots of US policy toward China are laid in the geopolitical thinking mode of its strategic culture. This mode of thinking first originated in Britain and later evolved into geopolitics. Bearing such thoughts, the United States sees China as a country at the southeastern rim of the Eurasian continent, and the rise of China is a threat to its dominance as a maritime state in the Eurasian continent. No matter the rotation of governing parties in the United States, containing the development of China is not merely an expedient for electoral politics but an inevitable choice for maritime states to contain continental states and an objectively necessary national security strategy aimed at retaining the global hegemony of the United States. As China further develops, such intention will become more and more apparent. In order to achieve the goal of slowing down China’s development pace and maintaining US’s political dominance over Eurasia, it seems that the United States has to build a maritime alliance system. The alliance between Japan and the United States will be further strengthened since Japan is a strategic pivot of this system. However, Japan’s perception of interests and strategic thinking are not fully aligned with those of the United States, and as a result, Japan will choose strategies with a certain degree of autonomy, thus eventually limiting the implementation of US’s geopolitical strategies. From the viewpoints of power transfer, geopolitics and ideology for the confrontation between maritime and continental states, this paper focuses on the limitations of the geopolitical thinking behind US’s policy-making toward China and the relatively autonomous strategy of Japan to analyze the status quo and underlying trends of China–US–Japan relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国对华政策背后的地缘政治思考与日本的外交选择
美国对华政策的根源在于其战略文化的地缘政治思维模式。这种思维方式最早起源于英国,后来演变为地缘政治。抱着这样的想法,美国将中国视为欧亚大陆东南边缘的一个国家,中国的崛起对美国在欧亚大陆的海洋国家地位构成了威胁。无论美国执政党如何交替,遏制中国的发展不仅是选举政治的权宜之计,而且是海洋国家遏制大陆国家的必然选择,是美国维护全球霸权的客观上必要的国家安全战略。随着中国的进一步发展,这种意图将越来越明显。为了达到减缓中国发展速度和保持美国在欧亚大陆的政治主导地位的目的,美国似乎必须建立一个海上联盟体系。由于日本是这一体系的战略支点,日美同盟将进一步加强。然而,日本的利益观念和战略思维与美国并不完全一致,因此,日本会选择具有一定自主权的战略,从而最终限制了美国地缘政治战略的实施。本文从海陆两国对抗的权力转移、地缘政治和意识形态角度出发,着眼于美国对华政策背后地缘政治思维的局限性和日本相对自主的对华战略,分析中美关系的现状和潜在趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
China–US Strategic Competition and Indonesia’s Status Anxiety The Logical Contradictions of the US Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Response China’s COVID-19 Vaccine Cooperation with Southeast Asia: A Boost for the Health Silk Road Initiative The Biden Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and its Impacts on Asia-Pacific Order An Analysis of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF): Essence, Impacts and Prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1