An Analysis of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF): Essence, Impacts and Prospects

Fangfei Jiang
{"title":"An Analysis of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF): Essence, Impacts and Prospects","authors":"Fangfei Jiang","doi":"10.1142/s2737557922500103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) proposed by the Biden administration has gone through three major stages — conception, preparation and engagement, and initial negotiation — and focuses on four key pillars: Connected Economy, Resilient Economy, Clean Economy, and Fair Economy. In fact, this initiative supplements and reinforces the Trump administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, while carrying forward and advancing the “America First” policy. It is a new attempt of the US to build an economic club exclusive of China in the Indo-Pacific and to lead in building a new structure for regional cooperation, as well as a diplomatic signal deliberately released by the Biden administration to its Eurasian allies during the Russia–Ukarine conflict. As the prospects of the IPEF are still of much uncertainty, it might exert few substantial impacts on China in the short term. However, we should still be alert to its long-term adverse influence on China–US relations, China’s surrounding international environment and foreign relations, the development of regional economic cooperation and world economy, as well as the stability of international order. Given the domestic situation in the US and the attitude of the other members, the progress of IPEF negotiations in the four pillars may vary significantly in the coming period.","PeriodicalId":85727,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of East Asian affairs","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of East Asian affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2737557922500103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) proposed by the Biden administration has gone through three major stages — conception, preparation and engagement, and initial negotiation — and focuses on four key pillars: Connected Economy, Resilient Economy, Clean Economy, and Fair Economy. In fact, this initiative supplements and reinforces the Trump administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, while carrying forward and advancing the “America First” policy. It is a new attempt of the US to build an economic club exclusive of China in the Indo-Pacific and to lead in building a new structure for regional cooperation, as well as a diplomatic signal deliberately released by the Biden administration to its Eurasian allies during the Russia–Ukarine conflict. As the prospects of the IPEF are still of much uncertainty, it might exert few substantial impacts on China in the short term. However, we should still be alert to its long-term adverse influence on China–US relations, China’s surrounding international environment and foreign relations, the development of regional economic cooperation and world economy, as well as the stability of international order. Given the domestic situation in the US and the attitude of the other members, the progress of IPEF negotiations in the four pillars may vary significantly in the coming period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度-太平洋经济框架分析:本质、影响与展望
拜登政府提出的“印度-太平洋经济框架”(IPEF)经历了构想、准备和接触、初步谈判三个主要阶段,并以“互联经济”、“弹性经济”、“清洁经济”、“公平经济”四大支柱为核心。事实上,“一带一路”是对特朗普政府“印太战略”的补充和强化,是对“美国优先”政策的继承和推进。这是美国在印太地区打造“中国之外的经济俱乐部”、主导构建区域合作新格局的新尝试,也是拜登政府在俄乌冲突中刻意向欧亚盟友释放的外交信号。由于IPEF的前景仍然存在很大的不确定性,短期内它对中国的影响可能不大。但对中美关系、对中国周边国际环境和对外关系、对区域经济合作和世界经济发展、对国际秩序稳定的长期不利影响,我们仍应保持警惕。考虑到美国国内形势和其他成员的态度,未来一段时间内,四大支柱的IPEF谈判进展可能会有很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
China–US Strategic Competition and Indonesia’s Status Anxiety The Logical Contradictions of the US Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Response China’s COVID-19 Vaccine Cooperation with Southeast Asia: A Boost for the Health Silk Road Initiative The Biden Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and its Impacts on Asia-Pacific Order An Analysis of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF): Essence, Impacts and Prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1