8. Infringement

L. Bently, B. Sherman, D. Gangjee, P. Johnson
{"title":"8. Infringement","authors":"L. Bently, B. Sherman, D. Gangjee, P. Johnson","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198769958.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers the question of what amounts to copyright infringement, first by discussing ‘primary’ infringement and ‘secondary’ infringement. It then explains the three criteria used to determine whether copyright in a work has been infringed: whether the defendant carried out one of the activities that falls within the copyright owner’s rights; whether there is a causal link between the work used (that is, reproduced, issued, rented, performed, communicated, or adapted) by the defendant and the copyright work; and whether the restricted act has been committed in relation to the work or a substantial part thereof. It also looks at the European approach to finding infringement in relation to authorial works and compares it with the British approach before concluding with a description of non-literal copying of such works.","PeriodicalId":88929,"journal":{"name":"Marquette intellectual property law review","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marquette intellectual property law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198769958.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter considers the question of what amounts to copyright infringement, first by discussing ‘primary’ infringement and ‘secondary’ infringement. It then explains the three criteria used to determine whether copyright in a work has been infringed: whether the defendant carried out one of the activities that falls within the copyright owner’s rights; whether there is a causal link between the work used (that is, reproduced, issued, rented, performed, communicated, or adapted) by the defendant and the copyright work; and whether the restricted act has been committed in relation to the work or a substantial part thereof. It also looks at the European approach to finding infringement in relation to authorial works and compares it with the British approach before concluding with a description of non-literal copying of such works.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
8. 侵权
本章首先讨论了“主要”侵权和“次要”侵权,讨论了什么构成版权侵权的问题。然后解释了用于确定作品的版权是否被侵犯的三个标准:被告是否进行了属于版权所有者权利范围内的活动;被告使用的作品(即复制、发行、出租、表演、传播或改编)与版权作品之间是否存在因果关系;以及限制行为是否与该工作或其实质性部分有关。本文还考察了欧洲在发现与作者作品有关的侵权行为方面的做法,并将其与英国的做法进行了比较,最后对此类作品的非字面复制进行了描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intellectual Property Institution in the Cultural-Historical and Strategic Mode Accounting of Intangible Assets and Their Reflection in Corporate Reporting in Conditions of Digital Transformation Artificial Intelligence in the Future Law Enforcement Officers Training System Roadmap for the Development of Competition in Science and Higher Education as a Tool to Eliminate Barriers to the Growth of Competitiveness of Russian Science on Global Markets Intellectual Property Issues in Video Games
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1