Power Allocation for Multi-Cell Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Networks: Energy Efficiency vs. Throughput vs. Power Consumption

S. R. C. Magalhães, S. Bayhan, G. Heijenk
{"title":"Power Allocation for Multi-Cell Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Networks: Energy Efficiency vs. Throughput vs. Power Consumption","authors":"S. R. C. Magalhães, S. Bayhan, G. Heijenk","doi":"10.1109/EuCNC/6GSummit58263.2023.10188279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pressing need for more energy-efficient networks requires understanding the trade-offs maintained by emerging technologies that are expected to help serve an increasing number of connected devices and meet their rate requirements. While spectral efficiency is typically a key performance indicator, hence used for optimal resource allocation, energy efficiency and power consumption of a wireless network should also be considered while deciding on the potential adoption of a new technology. In this paper, we focus on non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) as it is considered as a candidate radio access scheme due to its promise to improve spectral efficiency. With a goal of understanding whether joint transmission offers benefits over conventional NOMA, we investigate the performance of joint-transmission NOMA and NOMA considering three objectives: throughput maximization (SumRate), energy efficiency maximization (EE), and power minimization (minP). Different from the literature, we incorporate a power consumption model that accounts for the overhead introduced by successive interference cancellation that is necessary to distinguish the intended signal of a NOMA receiver from the interfering signals aimed for other users in the same cluster. After formulating the optimal power allocation problems, we present our solution steps to make the original problems convex for solving them optimally. Our numerical analysis shows that, for the studied two-cell scenario, joint-transmission offers a benefit only in terms of finding a feasible power allocation while NOMA fails in more cases irrespective of the considered objective. Additionally, our investigation of trade-offs between the investigated problems shows orders of magnitude difference in energy efficiency and throughput for small variations in power consumption.","PeriodicalId":65870,"journal":{"name":"公共管理高层论坛","volume":"166 1","pages":"287-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"公共管理高层论坛","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EuCNC/6GSummit58263.2023.10188279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The pressing need for more energy-efficient networks requires understanding the trade-offs maintained by emerging technologies that are expected to help serve an increasing number of connected devices and meet their rate requirements. While spectral efficiency is typically a key performance indicator, hence used for optimal resource allocation, energy efficiency and power consumption of a wireless network should also be considered while deciding on the potential adoption of a new technology. In this paper, we focus on non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) as it is considered as a candidate radio access scheme due to its promise to improve spectral efficiency. With a goal of understanding whether joint transmission offers benefits over conventional NOMA, we investigate the performance of joint-transmission NOMA and NOMA considering three objectives: throughput maximization (SumRate), energy efficiency maximization (EE), and power minimization (minP). Different from the literature, we incorporate a power consumption model that accounts for the overhead introduced by successive interference cancellation that is necessary to distinguish the intended signal of a NOMA receiver from the interfering signals aimed for other users in the same cluster. After formulating the optimal power allocation problems, we present our solution steps to make the original problems convex for solving them optimally. Our numerical analysis shows that, for the studied two-cell scenario, joint-transmission offers a benefit only in terms of finding a feasible power allocation while NOMA fails in more cases irrespective of the considered objective. Additionally, our investigation of trade-offs between the investigated problems shows orders of magnitude difference in energy efficiency and throughput for small variations in power consumption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多小区非正交多址网络的功率分配:能效、吞吐量和功耗
对更节能的网络的迫切需求需要理解新兴技术所维持的权衡,这些技术有望帮助服务越来越多的连接设备并满足其速率要求。频谱效率通常是一个关键的性能指标,因此用于优化资源分配,在决定是否采用一项新技术时,也应考虑无线网络的能源效率和功耗。本文重点研究了非正交多址(NOMA),因为它有望提高频谱效率,被认为是一种候选的无线电接入方案。为了了解联合传输是否比传统NOMA更有优势,我们研究了联合传输NOMA和NOMA的性能,考虑了三个目标:吞吐量最大化(SumRate)、能效最大化(EE)和功率最小化(minP)。与文献不同的是,我们纳入了一个功耗模型,该模型考虑了连续干扰消除带来的开销,这是区分NOMA接收器的预期信号与针对同一集群中其他用户的干扰信号所必需的。在确定了最优功率分配问题后,给出了求解步骤,使原问题凸出,从而得到最优解。我们的数值分析表明,对于所研究的双蜂窝场景,联合传输仅在寻找可行的功率分配方面提供了好处,而NOMA在更多情况下失败,无论所考虑的目标如何。此外,我们对所调查问题之间权衡的调查显示,对于功耗的微小变化,能源效率和吞吐量存在数量级差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
385
期刊最新文献
Undersampling and SNR Degradation in Practical Direct RF Sampling Systems Research Challenges in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and Computing for Health: The Case of the PRE-ACT project Inter-Satellite Link Prediction for Non-Terrestrial Networks Using Supervised Learning AI-Powered Edge Computing Evolution for Beyond 5G Communication Networks Phase Modulation-based Fronthaul Network for 5G mmWave FR-2 Signal Transmission over Hybrid Links
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1