Evaluation of different fertilizer management guidelines for boro rice cultivation in south central coastal region of Bangladesh

M.A.A. Mamun , M.M. Haque , M.A. Saleque , Q.A. Khaliq , A.J.M.S. Karim , M.A. Karim
{"title":"Evaluation of different fertilizer management guidelines for boro rice cultivation in south central coastal region of Bangladesh","authors":"M.A.A. Mamun ,&nbsp;M.M. Haque ,&nbsp;M.A. Saleque ,&nbsp;Q.A. Khaliq ,&nbsp;A.J.M.S. Karim ,&nbsp;M.A. Karim","doi":"10.1016/j.aasci.2018.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Improving productivity and farm income is the challenge for the grower in rice cultivation. Therefore, a series of on-farm field experiments were conducted to evaluate comparative performance of different nutrient management practices in <em>boro</em> rice production in south central coastal region of Bangladesh. The performance of high yielding rice varieties were tested with four fertilizer management options, viz. (i) use of Rice Crop Manager (RCM), (ii) Soil Test Based (STB) fertilizer application, (iii) BRRI Recommended Fertilizer (BRF) application, and (iv) Farmers' Fertilizer Practice (FFP). Fertilizer management practices and variety interacted significantly to influence yield components like panicle m<sup>−2</sup>, grains panicle<sup>−1</sup> and 1000-grain weight of rice. Similarly, grain yield of rice also significantly varied with the interaction of fertilizer management and rice varieties. Application of BRF produced maximum grain yield of <em>boro</em> rice. However, the grain yield produced with RCM was comparable with that of BRF management. The RCM involved lower fertilizer cost than that of BRF and FFP. Hence, the gross return and profit of rice obtained from RCM was similar with that in BRF. The cost dominant analysis confirmed that RCM was economic and profitable fertilizer management practices in southern Bangladesh.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100092,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Agrarian Science","volume":"16 4","pages":"Pages 466-475"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aasci.2018.05.005","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Agrarian Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1512188717301744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Improving productivity and farm income is the challenge for the grower in rice cultivation. Therefore, a series of on-farm field experiments were conducted to evaluate comparative performance of different nutrient management practices in boro rice production in south central coastal region of Bangladesh. The performance of high yielding rice varieties were tested with four fertilizer management options, viz. (i) use of Rice Crop Manager (RCM), (ii) Soil Test Based (STB) fertilizer application, (iii) BRRI Recommended Fertilizer (BRF) application, and (iv) Farmers' Fertilizer Practice (FFP). Fertilizer management practices and variety interacted significantly to influence yield components like panicle m−2, grains panicle−1 and 1000-grain weight of rice. Similarly, grain yield of rice also significantly varied with the interaction of fertilizer management and rice varieties. Application of BRF produced maximum grain yield of boro rice. However, the grain yield produced with RCM was comparable with that of BRF management. The RCM involved lower fertilizer cost than that of BRF and FFP. Hence, the gross return and profit of rice obtained from RCM was similar with that in BRF. The cost dominant analysis confirmed that RCM was economic and profitable fertilizer management practices in southern Bangladesh.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉国中南部沿海地区水稻种植不同肥料管理准则的评价
提高生产力和农业收入是水稻种植者面临的挑战。因此,在孟加拉国中南部沿海地区进行了一系列田间试验,以评估不同营养管理措施在水稻生产中的比较性能。采用四种肥料管理方案测试了高产水稻品种的表现,即(i)使用水稻作物管理器(RCM), (ii)基于土壤试验的肥料施用(STB), (iii) BRRI推荐肥料(BRF)施用,以及(iv)农民肥料实践(FFP)。施肥管理方式和品种对水稻穗粒数m - 2、穗粒数1和千粒重等产量组成因素影响显著。同样,水稻的产量也随着肥料管理和水稻品种的相互作用而显著变化。施用BRF后稻谷产量最高。然而,RCM与BRF管理的粮食产量相当。与BRF和FFP相比,RCM的肥料成本较低。因此,通过RCM获得的水稻总收益和利润与BRF相似。成本优势分析证实,RCM是孟加拉国南部经济和有利可图的肥料管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of genetic diversity of passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims) genotypes grown in Kenya by sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers Recent plant growth and stress management related significant advancements in epigenetics Evaluation of different fertilizer management guidelines for boro rice cultivation in south central coastal region of Bangladesh Main oak species and fungi associated with oak trees described in Georgian mycological herbarium Reduction of C. jejuni may require complex approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1