Fine pitch BGA solder joint split in SMT process

Chun-Chi Chiu, Yun-Tsung Li, Hsun-Fa Li, Chuei-Tang Wang
{"title":"Fine pitch BGA solder joint split in SMT process","authors":"Chun-Chi Chiu, Yun-Tsung Li, Hsun-Fa Li, Chuei-Tang Wang","doi":"10.1109/IMPACT.2009.5382257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fine pitch(≦0.5mm) BGAs were assembled on many kinds of products for many years, such as Smart Handheld Device, Mobile Phone, Network Device, Notebook main board, etc. Normally the BGA defects are solder joint bridge, solder joint open, and BGA solder joint crack during assembly process. Regarding the solder joint crack, most of cases are caused by external force, such as assembly operation, board testing operation, or unmatched mechanical parts assembly. In our case, we found the BGA solder joint crack is not the same root cause as mentioned above. When we got the two defect PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) devices, we did the FA (Failure Analysis) as usual. The first step, we did the functional test and X-ray analysis again to find the failure symptom. The device could work normally again in functional test by pressing the top of CPU (BGA package). We also performed CSA (Cross Section Analysis) and dye and pry test to realize the defect is BGA solder joint crack. Regarding the result, we suspected that the crack might not be caused by external force due to the crack did not locate at the corner or outer row of BGA. But we still can't identify which process or operation to cause the defect. At the same time, we had sorted more same defect boards from our stock. We determined this is not the single case. So, we had three directions to analyze. For material, we had performed push test, CSA and EDS (Energy Dispersive Spectrometer) to verify the solder ball due to the solder crack was at BGA package side. For process, we had conducted two experiments to find out the suspected station and operation. From our experiment result, we had two conclusions. One is the defect could not be eliminated by changing the reflow parameters or the type of reflow oven, the other is the defect occurred in 2nd side SMT process. So, to change the process sequence would be the short-term solution to prevent the defect happen again before we find out the root cause. We also found the defects located at some specific points from our experiment result. Then we focused on the relationship between crack locations and PCB design and found that every crack solder joint has buried via beneath it. It means the buried via is the major cause of solder joint crack during SMT process. So, we had analyzed the structure and filling material of buried via of HDI (High Density Interconnect) PCB. We found the different CTE (Coefficient of Thermal Expansion) between PCB and buried via filling material would caused thermal stress remain around the BGA solder joint by CAE (Computer- Aided Engineering) simulation. When the fine pitch BGA solder joint was proceeded into 2nd side SMT reflow, the thermal stress will split the BGA solder joint. So, how to eliminate the thermal stress will be the solution for BGA solder joint split. Referring to the article for more details discussed.","PeriodicalId":6410,"journal":{"name":"2009 4th International Microsystems, Packaging, Assembly and Circuits Technology Conference","volume":"16 1","pages":"602-605"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 4th International Microsystems, Packaging, Assembly and Circuits Technology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMPACT.2009.5382257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Fine pitch(≦0.5mm) BGAs were assembled on many kinds of products for many years, such as Smart Handheld Device, Mobile Phone, Network Device, Notebook main board, etc. Normally the BGA defects are solder joint bridge, solder joint open, and BGA solder joint crack during assembly process. Regarding the solder joint crack, most of cases are caused by external force, such as assembly operation, board testing operation, or unmatched mechanical parts assembly. In our case, we found the BGA solder joint crack is not the same root cause as mentioned above. When we got the two defect PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) devices, we did the FA (Failure Analysis) as usual. The first step, we did the functional test and X-ray analysis again to find the failure symptom. The device could work normally again in functional test by pressing the top of CPU (BGA package). We also performed CSA (Cross Section Analysis) and dye and pry test to realize the defect is BGA solder joint crack. Regarding the result, we suspected that the crack might not be caused by external force due to the crack did not locate at the corner or outer row of BGA. But we still can't identify which process or operation to cause the defect. At the same time, we had sorted more same defect boards from our stock. We determined this is not the single case. So, we had three directions to analyze. For material, we had performed push test, CSA and EDS (Energy Dispersive Spectrometer) to verify the solder ball due to the solder crack was at BGA package side. For process, we had conducted two experiments to find out the suspected station and operation. From our experiment result, we had two conclusions. One is the defect could not be eliminated by changing the reflow parameters or the type of reflow oven, the other is the defect occurred in 2nd side SMT process. So, to change the process sequence would be the short-term solution to prevent the defect happen again before we find out the root cause. We also found the defects located at some specific points from our experiment result. Then we focused on the relationship between crack locations and PCB design and found that every crack solder joint has buried via beneath it. It means the buried via is the major cause of solder joint crack during SMT process. So, we had analyzed the structure and filling material of buried via of HDI (High Density Interconnect) PCB. We found the different CTE (Coefficient of Thermal Expansion) between PCB and buried via filling material would caused thermal stress remain around the BGA solder joint by CAE (Computer- Aided Engineering) simulation. When the fine pitch BGA solder joint was proceeded into 2nd side SMT reflow, the thermal stress will split the BGA solder joint. So, how to eliminate the thermal stress will be the solution for BGA solder joint split. Referring to the article for more details discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小间距BGA焊点在SMT工艺中断裂
细间距(≦0.5mm) bga多年装配于各类产品,如智能手持设备、移动电话、网络设备、笔记本主板等。BGA缺陷一般为焊点桥接、焊点开口、BGA焊点在装配过程中出现裂纹。对于焊点裂纹,大多数情况下是由外力引起的,如装配操作,板测试操作,或不匹配的机械零件装配。在我们的案例中,我们发现BGA焊点裂纹与上面提到的根本原因不同。当我们收到两台有缺陷的PDA(个人数字助理)设备时,我们像往常一样做了FA(故障分析)。第一步,我们再次进行了功能测试和x射线分析,以找到故障症状。在功能测试中,按下CPU (BGA封装)顶部即可恢复正常工作。我们还进行了CSA (Cross Section Analysis)和dye and spy测试,以确定缺陷是BGA焊点裂纹。对于这个结果,我们怀疑裂缝可能不是外力造成的,因为裂缝并没有位于BGA的角落或外排。但是我们仍然不能确定是哪个过程或操作导致了缺陷。与此同时,我们从库存中拣出了更多相同的缺陷板。我们确定这不是唯一的情况。所以,我们有三个方向来分析。对于材料,我们进行了推挤测试,CSA和EDS(能量色散光谱仪)来验证由于焊料裂纹导致的焊料球在BGA封装侧。在过程中,我们进行了两次实验,以找出可疑的工位和操作。从我们的实验结果,我们有两个结论。一种是通过改变回流参数或回流炉类型无法消除的缺陷,另一种是在第2侧SMT工艺中出现的缺陷。因此,在我们找到根本原因之前,改变工艺顺序将是防止缺陷再次发生的短期解决方案。我们也从实验结果中发现缺陷位于一些特定的点上。然后我们重点研究了裂纹位置与PCB设计之间的关系,发现每个裂纹焊点在其下方都埋有通孔。说明埋孔是SMT工艺中造成焊点裂纹的主要原因。在此基础上,对HDI(高密度互连)PCB的埋孔结构和填充材料进行了分析。通过计算机辅助工程(CAE)仿真发现,PCB与埋地填充材料之间的热膨胀系数(CTE)差异会导致BGA焊点周围存在热应力。当小间距BGA焊点进入第二侧SMT回流时,热应力会使BGA焊点发生分裂。因此,如何消除焊点的热应力将是解决BGA焊点劈裂问题的关键。有关讨论的更多细节,请参考文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estimation design of MEMS-based inertial navigation systems with noise coupling input saturation: Robust approach Experimental investigation and finite element analysis of bump wafer probing Optimum design of contact springs used in registered jack connectors Optimization design of cup-shaped copper heat spreaders for high-power InGaN/sapphire LEDs The high performance electrodeposited copper foil for next generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1