Brexit Calling! Aftermath in the Pharmaceutical Industry

H. Tsangari, Ioanna Mantara
{"title":"Brexit Calling! Aftermath in the Pharmaceutical Industry","authors":"H. Tsangari, Ioanna Mantara","doi":"10.18488/journal.62.2021.82.70.80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"JEL Classification: C12; C13; C2; G3; G4. This paper aims to examine the impact of the Brexit referendum on the financial performance of the pharmaceutical industry in the United Kingdom. We analyze daily data for the period 1/2000-10/2019, for the two largest British pharmaceutical firms, GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca, as well as two European competitors, the Swiss Novartis and the German Bayer. We perform returns and volatility analysis, financial ratio analysis and regression analysis. Our empirical results are heterogeneous among firms, pinpointing strengths and weaknesses of the pharmaceutical firms. The Brexit decision has had a significant, positive effect on the stock returns of the two British firms, a negative effect for Bayer and no effect for Novartis, while lagged returns are significant only for the European firms. At least in the short-run, both British firms have gained considerably from the depreciation of the sterling and should aim to expand their overseas network and avoid prospective trade barriers and regulatory issues.","PeriodicalId":53010,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Business and Islamic Economics","volume":"12 1","pages":"70-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Business and Islamic Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.62.2021.82.70.80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

JEL Classification: C12; C13; C2; G3; G4. This paper aims to examine the impact of the Brexit referendum on the financial performance of the pharmaceutical industry in the United Kingdom. We analyze daily data for the period 1/2000-10/2019, for the two largest British pharmaceutical firms, GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca, as well as two European competitors, the Swiss Novartis and the German Bayer. We perform returns and volatility analysis, financial ratio analysis and regression analysis. Our empirical results are heterogeneous among firms, pinpointing strengths and weaknesses of the pharmaceutical firms. The Brexit decision has had a significant, positive effect on the stock returns of the two British firms, a negative effect for Bayer and no effect for Novartis, while lagged returns are significant only for the European firms. At least in the short-run, both British firms have gained considerably from the depreciation of the sterling and should aim to expand their overseas network and avoid prospective trade barriers and regulatory issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brexit打电话!制药行业的后果
JEL分类:C12;C13;C2;G3;G4。本文旨在研究英国脱欧公投对英国制药行业财务绩效的影响。我们分析了2000年1月至2019年10月期间两家最大的英国制药公司葛兰素史克(GlaxoSmithKline)和阿斯利康(AstraZeneca)以及两家欧洲竞争对手瑞士诺华(Novartis)和德国拜耳(Bayer)的每日数据。我们进行收益和波动性分析、财务比率分析和回归分析。我们的实证结果在企业之间是异质的,准确地指出了制药企业的优势和劣势。英国脱欧决定对两家英国公司的股票回报产生了显著的积极影响,对拜耳产生了负面影响,对诺华没有影响,而滞后回报仅对欧洲公司有显著影响。至少在短期内,这两家英国公司都从英镑贬值中获得了相当大的收益,它们应该致力于扩大海外网络,避免潜在的贸易壁垒和监管问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Local Government Strategies to Reduce Unemployment Does Human Capital and Gender Equality Affect Economic Growth for Ten Province in Sumatera? Socio-economic Analysis of Street Vending in Asmara city, Eritrea: Case Study Edaga-Hamus Work Engagement and Emotional Intelligence on Personnel Performance: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction Local Original Revenue Receipts Before and After Electronification Local Government Transactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1