The CEFR-Aligned Curriculum Execution in Malaysia and Other Countries: A Conceptual Paper

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Malaysian Journal of ELT Research Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.52696/tgct6849
Noor Azli Affendy Lee, Aini Akmar Mohd Kassim, Rofiza Aboo Bakar
{"title":"The CEFR-Aligned Curriculum Execution in Malaysia and Other Countries: A Conceptual Paper","authors":"Noor Azli Affendy Lee, Aini Akmar Mohd Kassim, Rofiza Aboo Bakar","doi":"10.52696/tgct6849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) impacts language education, learning and evaluation in the European nations as well as in different nations around the world. The recently presented CEFR-aligned educational plan through the Malaysian English Language Roadmap (2013-2025) could set up a fundamental and reliable arrangement of learning guidance and evaluation in Malaysia. As the CEFR has been broadly embraced by numerous nations before its selection in Malaysia, there is a need to look at the issues faced by different nations to guarantee a superior arrangement of the CEFR in the Malaysian educational program. This paper aims to examine the executions of the CEFR in a few nations to satisfy their respective education policies in order to compare with the development and execution of the CEFR in Malaysian schools and universities. In this investigation, a review of 25 research papers published in journals from the year 2010 to 2019 related to the CEFR transformation and execution issues for English language from different nations all around the world, including Malaysia, was conducted. Utilising Google Scholar, these papers were selected with important keywords such as “CEFR” and the name of the chosen country. In view of the current writing, a few differences just as qualities and constraints of the CEFR-aligned executions were underscored, which propose required data to rethink the execution of the CEFR in the Malaysian education curriculum in order to accomplish the significant goal of refining English instructing, learning and assessment. The paper ends with proposals on the need to normalise academic practice to improve the CEFRaligned educational program change endeavours.","PeriodicalId":52060,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of ELT Research","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of ELT Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52696/tgct6849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) impacts language education, learning and evaluation in the European nations as well as in different nations around the world. The recently presented CEFR-aligned educational plan through the Malaysian English Language Roadmap (2013-2025) could set up a fundamental and reliable arrangement of learning guidance and evaluation in Malaysia. As the CEFR has been broadly embraced by numerous nations before its selection in Malaysia, there is a need to look at the issues faced by different nations to guarantee a superior arrangement of the CEFR in the Malaysian educational program. This paper aims to examine the executions of the CEFR in a few nations to satisfy their respective education policies in order to compare with the development and execution of the CEFR in Malaysian schools and universities. In this investigation, a review of 25 research papers published in journals from the year 2010 to 2019 related to the CEFR transformation and execution issues for English language from different nations all around the world, including Malaysia, was conducted. Utilising Google Scholar, these papers were selected with important keywords such as “CEFR” and the name of the chosen country. In view of the current writing, a few differences just as qualities and constraints of the CEFR-aligned executions were underscored, which propose required data to rethink the execution of the CEFR in the Malaysian education curriculum in order to accomplish the significant goal of refining English instructing, learning and assessment. The paper ends with proposals on the need to normalise academic practice to improve the CEFRaligned educational program change endeavours.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚与其他国家的cefr课程执行:一份概念性论文
欧洲共同语言参考框架(CEFR)影响着欧洲国家以及世界其他国家的语言教育、学习和评价。由于CEFR在马来西亚选择之前已经被许多国家广泛接受,因此有必要研究不同国家面临的问题,以确保CEFR在马来西亚教育计划中的优越安排。本文旨在考察少数国家为满足各自的教育政策而实施CEFR的情况,以便与马来西亚中小学和大学CEFR的发展和实施进行比较。在本调查中,回顾了2010年至2019年发表在期刊上的25篇研究论文,这些论文涉及包括马来西亚在内的世界各国英语语言的CEFR转换和执行问题。利用Google Scholar,这些论文通过诸如“CEFR”和所选国家名称等重要关键词被选中。鉴于目前的写作,强调了与CEFR一致的执行的质量和限制的一些差异,这提出了需要的数据来重新思考CEFR在马来西亚教育课程中的执行,以实现改进英语教学,学习和评估的重要目标。论文最后提出了规范学术实践以改善与cefrc一致的教育计划变革努力的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of ELT Research
Malaysian Journal of ELT Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Ethnic Representation in Malaysian Year Five English Language Textbooks from 1968- 2016: from Erasure, to Proliferation, towards a “Malaysian” Narrative? CEFR-aligned Primary Curriculum Framework:Rural National Primary School English Language Teachers’ Attitudes and Slants Evaluation of Students’ Experience on Usage of Interactive Whiteboard for Verbal Presentation in An English Language Classroom The Significance of Online Verbal and Written Corrective Feedback in ESL Report Writing among Tertiary Students The Investments and Identities of In-Service Non-native English Teachers That Relate to Their Teaching Careers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1