{"title":"The copular subschema[become/devenir + past participle]in English and French","authors":"Niek Van Wettere","doi":"10.1075/lic.19013.van","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article presents a contrastive analysis of the English copular subschema [become + past\n participle] and the equivalent copular subschema [devenir + past participle] in French, based on web data. It is\n shown that both patterns are almost equally productive at the subject complement level. Furthermore, a more in-depth analysis\n demonstrates that, in the segment of participles with a high adjectival potential, devenir accumulates more\n participle tokens than become. Conversely, the reverse holds true for participles with a high verbal potential,\n in which case become is characterized by more participle tokens than devenir. This high amount\n of combinations between become and eventive participles also suggests a higher degree of passivity for\n become. However, in the segment of participles with an intermediate verbal potential,\n devenir is slightly more type frequent than become, which hints at an emerging productivity\n in this area for devenir as well.","PeriodicalId":43502,"journal":{"name":"Languages in Contrast","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages in Contrast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.19013.van","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article presents a contrastive analysis of the English copular subschema [become + past
participle] and the equivalent copular subschema [devenir + past participle] in French, based on web data. It is
shown that both patterns are almost equally productive at the subject complement level. Furthermore, a more in-depth analysis
demonstrates that, in the segment of participles with a high adjectival potential, devenir accumulates more
participle tokens than become. Conversely, the reverse holds true for participles with a high verbal potential,
in which case become is characterized by more participle tokens than devenir. This high amount
of combinations between become and eventive participles also suggests a higher degree of passivity for
become. However, in the segment of participles with an intermediate verbal potential,
devenir is slightly more type frequent than become, which hints at an emerging productivity
in this area for devenir as well.
期刊介绍:
Languages in Contrast aims to publish contrastive studies of two or more languages. Any aspect of language may be covered, including vocabulary, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, text and discourse, stylistics, sociolinguistics and psycholinguistics. Languages in Contrast welcomes interdisciplinary studies, particularly those that make links between contrastive linguistics and translation, lexicography, computational linguistics, language teaching, literary and linguistic computing, literary studies and cultural studies.