Effectiveness of adalimumab versus infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A randomized double blinded clinical trial

R. Salesi
{"title":"Effectiveness of adalimumab versus infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A randomized double blinded clinical trial","authors":"R. Salesi","doi":"10.37532/1758-4272.2021.16(2).073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy of Adalimumab versus Infliximab in patients with active Ankylosing Spondylitis. Method: 80 patients with active AS who were candidates for receiving anti TNF drugs were randomly assigned to Adalimumab receiving group (group A) or Infliximab receiving group (group B). At beginning, BASDAI score, ESR level, CRP level, presence or absence of peripheral arthritis and enthesitis, need for NSAID use, schober test and occiput to wall distance were recorded. A second rheumatologist who was unaware of the type of drug used, evaluated patients 2 months and 4 months after initiating treatment and new data was recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 26 with T-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-squared test, McNemar and Wilcoxon test. Results: after 2 and 4 months treatment, patients of both groups showed significant improvement in the BASDAI score, ESR level, CRP level and Schober test. They all needed less NSAID to control their pain. Both drugs had similar effects on clinical and laboratory variables. Conclusion: Adalimumab and Infliximab are both effective for improving clinical and physical status and quality of life in patients with active AS. Since there is no significant difference for the effectiveness of these 2 drugs, accessibility, price and administration of these drugs can help physicians decide between these drugs.","PeriodicalId":13740,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","volume":"17 1","pages":"073"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37532/1758-4272.2021.16(2).073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of Adalimumab versus Infliximab in patients with active Ankylosing Spondylitis. Method: 80 patients with active AS who were candidates for receiving anti TNF drugs were randomly assigned to Adalimumab receiving group (group A) or Infliximab receiving group (group B). At beginning, BASDAI score, ESR level, CRP level, presence or absence of peripheral arthritis and enthesitis, need for NSAID use, schober test and occiput to wall distance were recorded. A second rheumatologist who was unaware of the type of drug used, evaluated patients 2 months and 4 months after initiating treatment and new data was recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 26 with T-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-squared test, McNemar and Wilcoxon test. Results: after 2 and 4 months treatment, patients of both groups showed significant improvement in the BASDAI score, ESR level, CRP level and Schober test. They all needed less NSAID to control their pain. Both drugs had similar effects on clinical and laboratory variables. Conclusion: Adalimumab and Infliximab are both effective for improving clinical and physical status and quality of life in patients with active AS. Since there is no significant difference for the effectiveness of these 2 drugs, accessibility, price and administration of these drugs can help physicians decide between these drugs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿达木单抗与英夫利昔单抗在强直性脊柱炎患者中的有效性:一项随机双盲临床试验
目的:比较阿达木单抗与英夫利昔单抗治疗活动性强直性脊柱炎的疗效。方法:将80例拟接受抗肿瘤坏死因子药物治疗的活动性AS患者随机分为阿达木单抗治疗组(A组)和英夫利昔单抗治疗组(B组)。开始时记录BASDAI评分、ESR水平、CRP水平、有无周围性关节炎和炎症、是否需要使用非甾体抗炎药、schober试验和枕骨到壁面距离。另一位不知道所使用药物类型的风湿病学家在开始治疗后2个月和4个月对患者进行了评估,并记录了新的数据。采用SPSS软件26版对数据进行分析,采用t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、卡方检验、McNemar和Wilcoxon检验。结果:治疗2个月和4个月后,两组患者BASDAI评分、ESR水平、CRP水平和Schober试验均有显著改善。他们都需要较少的非甾体抗炎药来控制疼痛。两种药物对临床和实验室变量的影响相似。结论:阿达木单抗与英夫利昔单抗均能有效改善活动性AS患者的临床和身体状况及生活质量。由于这两种药物的疗效没有显著差异,因此这些药物的可及性、价格和给药方法可以帮助医生在这两种药物之间做出选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Severe coronal re-infection and issuesof mechanisms, monitoring and therapy Treatment patterns and costs ofpatients with ankylosing spondylitisinitiating biologic therapy in taiwan ??? apopulation-based analysis Effectiveness of adalimumab versus infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A randomized double blinded clinical trial Synovitis with pitting edema as the presenting manifestation of antisynthetase syndrome Demographic, clinical, and serological features of Iraqi patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of 470 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1