Pedometer step guidelines for physical education settings

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning Communities-International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts Pub Date : 2017-11-01 DOI:10.18793/lcj2017.21.14
Terry Magias, K. Ridley, S. Pill
{"title":"Pedometer step guidelines for physical education settings","authors":"Terry Magias, K. Ridley, S. Pill","doi":"10.18793/lcj2017.21.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of Physical Education (PE) in Australia is multifaceted, with physical activity (PA) participation recognised as the means by which a variety of learning outcomes are achieved. There is evidence to suggest that PA accrued during PE has the potential to be health enhancing. It may also be the only opportunity for some children, especially those from low socioeconomic backgrounds to accrue PA. This paper identifies criterion-referenced pedometer step guidelines as a valid, reliable, unobtrusive, and cost-effective means by which PA can be objectively quantified in PE settings. With the current state of the Health and Physical Education national curriculum area in focus, the application of pedometer step guidelines in PE settings are outlined. Introduction: Physical activity and the curriculum The Australian Curriculum for Health and Physical Education (ACHPE) suggests that Physical Education (PE) should be a foundation for lifelong physical activity (PA) participation. It also recommends appreciation of the significance of PA in society locally and globally (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, 2014). Brooker and Clennet (2005) suggested that although government and public expectations of PE to realise PA participation outcomes has served to narrow the scope of health and PE, few would argue that PA participation is not inherent to Australian PE. The Australian Council for Health, Physical Education and Recreation (ACHPER) (2009) acknowledge this position in a statement that is intended to inform the development of the Australian Health and Physical Education (HPE) Curriculum: Contexts of physical activity and sport are therefore central to HPE (ACHPER, 2009, p. 3-4) [...] “Students should be provided with HPE learning experiences that will enable them to” (ACHPER, 2009, p. 5-6). Although PA participation is recognised as the means by which PE learning outcomes can be realised and that PA appreciation and participation beyond the PE setting “now and in the future” is a goal rather than PE’s primary statement of learning content, PA is intrinsic to Australian PE contextually and pedagogically. 181 Learning Communities | Special Issue: 2017 30th AChPER International Conference | Number 21 – November 2017 Physical activity in physical education Several studies have shown that PA accrued in PE settings is associated with improved health outcomes in children and adolescents weight status (Datar & Sturm, 2004; Sollerhed & Ejlertsson, 2008; Wardle, Brodersen & Boniface, 2007) bone health (Weeks, Young & Beck, 2008) and blood pressure (Mc Murray et al., 2002). Some evidence also indicates that engagement in PE during childhood is associated with long-term positive effects on PA level, attitudes toward PA, and perceptions of barriers to PA during adulthood. Additionally, review papers have identified associations between curricular-PA or PE and academic performance. The contribution PE-based PA makes in relation to total daily PA levels or meeting Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) recommendations is potentially considerable. Upper primary and lower secondary school students have been found to acquire approximately 1133% of daily MVPA during PE lessons (Fairclough & Stratton, 2005; Wickel & Eisenmann, 2007). In relation to total daily PA levels, children aged 11-13 years have been found to accumulate 15.6%– 23.7% (boys) and 14.9%-17.2% (girls) of total daily pedometer step counts during PE lessons 45-50 minutes in duration (Flohr, Todd & Tudor-Locke, 2006; Reed, Metzker & Phillips, 2004). Smaller step contributions (boys = 8.7%, girls = 11.4%) have been found for 30-minute PE classes among children of a similar age (boys = 8.7%, girls = 11.4%) (Tudor-Locke, Lee, Morgan, Beighle & Pangrazi, 2006). There is some indication that children who are among the least active of their peers on most school days are likely to gain greater proportional increases (+18%) in PA from school days with PE compared to children who are consistently more active (+9-13%) (Morgan, Beighle & Pangrazi, 2007). For the school day, PE has been identified as being the largest contributor of PA (as measured via pedometers) for girls (14.3%) and the second largest for boys (12.7%) behind lunchtime (Brusseau et al., 2011). Despite the potential health, academic and lifelong engagement benefits of PA in PE settings, a specific PA duration & intensity guideline has not been recommended in Australian PE curricula, or developed by a professional organisation. Outside Australia, PA time guidelines that relate to PE settings exist. For example, United States (US) guidelines recommend that adolescents (grades 7-12) spend 50% of PE class time engaged in PA (Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee, 2008). A separate guideline developed by the American Heart Association recommends that all school children and youth should engage in at least 30 minutes of MVPA during school hours (including PE class time) per day (Pate et al., 2006). Presently, no other PA time guidelines specific to PE settings have been developed. Measuring physical activity in physical education settings (pedometry) A variety of PA measurement methods and instruments are used by researchers and practitioners to measure PA type, duration, intensity and frequency (Welk, 2002). Each method can be classified into a validity/reliability hierarchy containing three categories. These are criterion, objective and subjective PA measures (Sirard & Pate, 2001). Criterion measures are considered the most accurate assessment method and are often used to validate the ability of objective and subjective instruments in measuring PA (Welk, 2002). Each measure possesses strengths and limitations underpinned by its feasibility, reliability and validity in PA contexts. Pedometry and the direct observation instrument, the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT) have been used widely to measure PE-based PA for research purposes, though both measures pose limitations. For example although pedometry is cost-effective (Welk, 2002) it is unable to assess intensity, frequency, and duration of PA (Corder, Ekelund, Steele, Wareham & Brage, 2008). Conversely, while SOFIT has been proven to be valid and reliable (McClain, Abraham, Brusseau & Tudor-Locke, 2008) in measuring PE-based PA, the direct observation method itself is time intensive with regard to collecting data and training 182 Pedometer Step Guidelines for Physical Education Settings | Terry Magias, Kate Ridley & Shane Pill observers (Welk, 2002). Criterion referenced pedometer steps/min scores that are associated with various levels of PA provide an objective and validated option for measuring PA in PE. Therefore, they may helpful as a practical, valid and reliable means by which PA levels can be measured in PE settings for research purposes. They may also be used as a reference point by which the effectiveness of PE programs can be assessed in terms of their ability to engage students in PA. Three mechanism types are available for electronic pedometers including spring-levered, those that contain a magnetic reed proximity switch and piezo-electric models. The piezoelectric mechanism has been identified as possessing superior step-counting accuracy among children, undercounting steps -0.2% 4.2% compared to spring-levered designs which have shown accuracy discrepancies upwards of 25% (Nakae, Oshima, & Ishii, 2008). Accuracy differences are particularly pronounced at slower walking speeds, likely due to the vertical acceleration forces produced during slower speeds falling short of the 0.35g of force needed in order for steps to be registered in spring-levered models (Duncan, Schofield, Duncan, & Hinckson, 2007). Pedometer steps per minute guidelines in physical education settings While raw pedometer step counts do not provide information on PA intensity, frequency, or duration (Corder et al., 2008) six studies have developed pedometer steps/min intervals criterion-referenced by the direct observation instrument SOFIT, that equate to spending one third to a half of PE class time engaged in MVPA. The one third guideline was adapted from the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention and the Council for Physical Education and Children (cited in Scruggs, 2007a) who stipulated that students in the United States in grades K-6 should spend a significant proportion of PE lesson time engaged in PA. The United States Department for Health and Human Services recommendation that students in grades 7-12 spend 50% of PE class time engaged in PA (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2009). For the one third MVPA criteria, similar pedometer steps/min intervals were found across four studies ranging from 60.8-65.0, mainly among primary children aged between 6.9 and 13.8 years old (Scruggs et al., 2003, Scruggs, Beveridge, Watson, & Clocksin, 2005, Scruggs 2007b, Scruggs 2013b). For spending half of PE class time engaged in MVPA as recommended by The United States Department for Health and Human Services (2009), two studies found greater steps/min ranging from 79.1-88.0 for youth aged 12.5-15.5 years (Scruggs 2007a & Scruggs, Mungen & Oh, 2010). A follow up study sought to identify optimal steps/min intervals for both 33.33% and 50% MVPA criteria from combined data sets from previous research (Scruggs, 2013b). The findings of the study indicated that it was possible for common steps/min intervals to be set for students in 1st through to 12th grade Physical Education (United States). Steps/min intervals of 59.5-61.8 and 82.5-88.1 were identified for the 33.33% and 50% MVPA criteria respectively (Scruggs, 2007a; 2007b; 2013a; 2013b; & Scruggs et al., 2010). The present study aimed to expand upon previous research by assessing external validity of previously developed pedometer steps/min intervals and identify those most accurate for invasion sport games in lower PE grade settings. Invasion sports were considered to b","PeriodicalId":43860,"journal":{"name":"Learning Communities-International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Communities-International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18793/lcj2017.21.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of Physical Education (PE) in Australia is multifaceted, with physical activity (PA) participation recognised as the means by which a variety of learning outcomes are achieved. There is evidence to suggest that PA accrued during PE has the potential to be health enhancing. It may also be the only opportunity for some children, especially those from low socioeconomic backgrounds to accrue PA. This paper identifies criterion-referenced pedometer step guidelines as a valid, reliable, unobtrusive, and cost-effective means by which PA can be objectively quantified in PE settings. With the current state of the Health and Physical Education national curriculum area in focus, the application of pedometer step guidelines in PE settings are outlined. Introduction: Physical activity and the curriculum The Australian Curriculum for Health and Physical Education (ACHPE) suggests that Physical Education (PE) should be a foundation for lifelong physical activity (PA) participation. It also recommends appreciation of the significance of PA in society locally and globally (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, 2014). Brooker and Clennet (2005) suggested that although government and public expectations of PE to realise PA participation outcomes has served to narrow the scope of health and PE, few would argue that PA participation is not inherent to Australian PE. The Australian Council for Health, Physical Education and Recreation (ACHPER) (2009) acknowledge this position in a statement that is intended to inform the development of the Australian Health and Physical Education (HPE) Curriculum: Contexts of physical activity and sport are therefore central to HPE (ACHPER, 2009, p. 3-4) [...] “Students should be provided with HPE learning experiences that will enable them to” (ACHPER, 2009, p. 5-6). Although PA participation is recognised as the means by which PE learning outcomes can be realised and that PA appreciation and participation beyond the PE setting “now and in the future” is a goal rather than PE’s primary statement of learning content, PA is intrinsic to Australian PE contextually and pedagogically. 181 Learning Communities | Special Issue: 2017 30th AChPER International Conference | Number 21 – November 2017 Physical activity in physical education Several studies have shown that PA accrued in PE settings is associated with improved health outcomes in children and adolescents weight status (Datar & Sturm, 2004; Sollerhed & Ejlertsson, 2008; Wardle, Brodersen & Boniface, 2007) bone health (Weeks, Young & Beck, 2008) and blood pressure (Mc Murray et al., 2002). Some evidence also indicates that engagement in PE during childhood is associated with long-term positive effects on PA level, attitudes toward PA, and perceptions of barriers to PA during adulthood. Additionally, review papers have identified associations between curricular-PA or PE and academic performance. The contribution PE-based PA makes in relation to total daily PA levels or meeting Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) recommendations is potentially considerable. Upper primary and lower secondary school students have been found to acquire approximately 1133% of daily MVPA during PE lessons (Fairclough & Stratton, 2005; Wickel & Eisenmann, 2007). In relation to total daily PA levels, children aged 11-13 years have been found to accumulate 15.6%– 23.7% (boys) and 14.9%-17.2% (girls) of total daily pedometer step counts during PE lessons 45-50 minutes in duration (Flohr, Todd & Tudor-Locke, 2006; Reed, Metzker & Phillips, 2004). Smaller step contributions (boys = 8.7%, girls = 11.4%) have been found for 30-minute PE classes among children of a similar age (boys = 8.7%, girls = 11.4%) (Tudor-Locke, Lee, Morgan, Beighle & Pangrazi, 2006). There is some indication that children who are among the least active of their peers on most school days are likely to gain greater proportional increases (+18%) in PA from school days with PE compared to children who are consistently more active (+9-13%) (Morgan, Beighle & Pangrazi, 2007). For the school day, PE has been identified as being the largest contributor of PA (as measured via pedometers) for girls (14.3%) and the second largest for boys (12.7%) behind lunchtime (Brusseau et al., 2011). Despite the potential health, academic and lifelong engagement benefits of PA in PE settings, a specific PA duration & intensity guideline has not been recommended in Australian PE curricula, or developed by a professional organisation. Outside Australia, PA time guidelines that relate to PE settings exist. For example, United States (US) guidelines recommend that adolescents (grades 7-12) spend 50% of PE class time engaged in PA (Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee, 2008). A separate guideline developed by the American Heart Association recommends that all school children and youth should engage in at least 30 minutes of MVPA during school hours (including PE class time) per day (Pate et al., 2006). Presently, no other PA time guidelines specific to PE settings have been developed. Measuring physical activity in physical education settings (pedometry) A variety of PA measurement methods and instruments are used by researchers and practitioners to measure PA type, duration, intensity and frequency (Welk, 2002). Each method can be classified into a validity/reliability hierarchy containing three categories. These are criterion, objective and subjective PA measures (Sirard & Pate, 2001). Criterion measures are considered the most accurate assessment method and are often used to validate the ability of objective and subjective instruments in measuring PA (Welk, 2002). Each measure possesses strengths and limitations underpinned by its feasibility, reliability and validity in PA contexts. Pedometry and the direct observation instrument, the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT) have been used widely to measure PE-based PA for research purposes, though both measures pose limitations. For example although pedometry is cost-effective (Welk, 2002) it is unable to assess intensity, frequency, and duration of PA (Corder, Ekelund, Steele, Wareham & Brage, 2008). Conversely, while SOFIT has been proven to be valid and reliable (McClain, Abraham, Brusseau & Tudor-Locke, 2008) in measuring PE-based PA, the direct observation method itself is time intensive with regard to collecting data and training 182 Pedometer Step Guidelines for Physical Education Settings | Terry Magias, Kate Ridley & Shane Pill observers (Welk, 2002). Criterion referenced pedometer steps/min scores that are associated with various levels of PA provide an objective and validated option for measuring PA in PE. Therefore, they may helpful as a practical, valid and reliable means by which PA levels can be measured in PE settings for research purposes. They may also be used as a reference point by which the effectiveness of PE programs can be assessed in terms of their ability to engage students in PA. Three mechanism types are available for electronic pedometers including spring-levered, those that contain a magnetic reed proximity switch and piezo-electric models. The piezoelectric mechanism has been identified as possessing superior step-counting accuracy among children, undercounting steps -0.2% 4.2% compared to spring-levered designs which have shown accuracy discrepancies upwards of 25% (Nakae, Oshima, & Ishii, 2008). Accuracy differences are particularly pronounced at slower walking speeds, likely due to the vertical acceleration forces produced during slower speeds falling short of the 0.35g of force needed in order for steps to be registered in spring-levered models (Duncan, Schofield, Duncan, & Hinckson, 2007). Pedometer steps per minute guidelines in physical education settings While raw pedometer step counts do not provide information on PA intensity, frequency, or duration (Corder et al., 2008) six studies have developed pedometer steps/min intervals criterion-referenced by the direct observation instrument SOFIT, that equate to spending one third to a half of PE class time engaged in MVPA. The one third guideline was adapted from the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention and the Council for Physical Education and Children (cited in Scruggs, 2007a) who stipulated that students in the United States in grades K-6 should spend a significant proportion of PE lesson time engaged in PA. The United States Department for Health and Human Services recommendation that students in grades 7-12 spend 50% of PE class time engaged in PA (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2009). For the one third MVPA criteria, similar pedometer steps/min intervals were found across four studies ranging from 60.8-65.0, mainly among primary children aged between 6.9 and 13.8 years old (Scruggs et al., 2003, Scruggs, Beveridge, Watson, & Clocksin, 2005, Scruggs 2007b, Scruggs 2013b). For spending half of PE class time engaged in MVPA as recommended by The United States Department for Health and Human Services (2009), two studies found greater steps/min ranging from 79.1-88.0 for youth aged 12.5-15.5 years (Scruggs 2007a & Scruggs, Mungen & Oh, 2010). A follow up study sought to identify optimal steps/min intervals for both 33.33% and 50% MVPA criteria from combined data sets from previous research (Scruggs, 2013b). The findings of the study indicated that it was possible for common steps/min intervals to be set for students in 1st through to 12th grade Physical Education (United States). Steps/min intervals of 59.5-61.8 and 82.5-88.1 were identified for the 33.33% and 50% MVPA criteria respectively (Scruggs, 2007a; 2007b; 2013a; 2013b; & Scruggs et al., 2010). The present study aimed to expand upon previous research by assessing external validity of previously developed pedometer steps/min intervals and identify those most accurate for invasion sport games in lower PE grade settings. Invasion sports were considered to b
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育设置的计步器步骤指南
美国心脏协会制定的另一项指南建议,所有学龄儿童和青少年每天应在上课时间(包括体育课时间)至少进行30分钟的MVPA (Pate等,2006)。目前,还没有针对PE设置的其他PA时间指南。在体育教学环境中测量身体活动(计步法)研究人员和实践者使用各种PA测量方法和仪器来测量PA类型、持续时间、强度和频率(Welk, 2002)。每种方法都可以划分为包含三种类型的有效性/可靠性层次结构。这些是标准,客观和主观的PA措施(Sirard & Pate, 2001)。标准测量被认为是最准确的评估方法,通常用于验证测量PA的客观和主观仪器的能力(Welk, 2002)。每一项措施都有其优势和局限性,其可行性、可靠性和有效性在PA背景下得到了支持。计步器和直接观察仪器,即健身指导时间观察系统(SOFIT)被广泛用于测量基于pe的PA,用于研究目的,尽管这两种测量方法都存在局限性。例如,虽然计步法具有成本效益(Welk, 2002),但它无法评估PA的强度、频率和持续时间(Corder, Ekelund, Steele, Wareham & Brage, 2008)。相反,虽然SOFIT在测量基于pe的PA方面已被证明是有效和可靠的(McClain, Abraham, Brusseau & Tudor-Locke, 2008),但直接观察方法本身在收集数据和训练182个体育设置步数指南| Terry Magias, Kate Ridley和Shane Pill观察者方面是时间密集的(Welk, 2002)。标准参考计步器步数/分钟分数与不同水平的PA相关联,为PE中PA的测量提供了客观和有效的选择。因此,它们可能有助于作为一种实用、有效和可靠的手段,通过这种手段,可以在PE环境中测量PA水平,用于研究目的。它们也可以作为一个参考点,通过体育课程的有效性,可以根据他们吸引学生参与PA的能力来评估。三种机制类型可用于电子计步器,包括弹簧杠杆,那些包含一个磁簧接近开关和压电模型。与弹簧杠杆设计相比,压电机制已被确定为在儿童中具有优越的计步精度-0.2% 4.2%,其精度差异高达25% (Nakae, Oshima, & Ishii, 2008)。在较慢的行走速度下,准确度差异尤其明显,这可能是由于在较慢的行走速度下产生的垂直加速度力低于在弹簧杠杆模型中记录步数所需的0.35g力(Duncan, Schofield, Duncan, & Hinckson, 2007)。虽然原始的计步器步数不能提供有关运动强度、频率或持续时间的信息(Corder等人,2008年),但六项研究已经制定了计步器步数/分钟间隔标准,由直接观察仪器SOFIT参考,相当于将体育课时间的三分之一到一半用于MVPA。三分之一的指导方针改编自疾病控制与预防中心和体育教育与儿童委员会(引用于Scruggs, 2007a),该委员会规定,美国K-6年级的学生应该将很大一部分体育课时间花在体育活动上。美国卫生和人类服务部建议7-12年级的学生将体育课时间的50%用于PA(美国卫生和人类服务部,2009年)。对于三分之一的MVPA标准,在四项研究中发现了相似的计步器步数/分钟间隔,范围为60.8-65.0,主要是6.9 - 13.8岁的小学生(Scruggs et al., 2003, Scruggs, Beveridge, Watson, & Clocksin, 2005, Scruggs 2007b, Scruggs 2013b)。根据美国卫生和人类服务部(2009年)的建议,将体育课时间的一半用于MVPA,两项研究发现,12.5-15.5岁的青少年每分钟走79.1-88.0步(Scruggs 2007年a和Scruggs, Mungen和Oh, 2010年)。一项后续研究试图从先前研究的组合数据集中确定33.33%和50% MVPA标准的最佳步数/分钟间隔(Scruggs, 2013年3b)。该研究的结果表明,在一至十二年级的体育教育(美国)中,为学生设定共同的步数/分钟间隔是可能的。对于33.33%和50%的MVPA标准,分别确定了59.5-61.8和82.5-88.1步/分钟间隔(Scruggs, 2007;2007 b;2013年;2013 b;& Scruggs et al., 2010)。 本研究旨在通过评估先前开发的计步器步数/分钟间隔的外部有效性来扩展先前的研究,并确定那些最准确的侵入性体育游戏在较低体育水平的设置。侵略运动被认为是b
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.10%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Child Mortality, Fertility and Poverty: A Counterfactual Analysis Hear it From the Horses’ Mouth: Listening to African Professionals in Australia Undoing Theory: Walking of Arrernte Country – Co-creating Knowledge and Meaning in Central Australia Ground Up Inquiry: Questions and Answers About the Emergence and Development of a Northern Australian Tradition of Situated Research Editorial: Working with multiple knowledges in Australia’s top end
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1