The Financial Impact of Increasing Surgical Complexity: Contribution of Sugammadex as Safer Choice for Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal in an Ambulatory Surgical Center

H. Machado, J. Completo
{"title":"The Financial Impact of Increasing Surgical Complexity: Contribution of Sugammadex as Safer Choice for Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal in an Ambulatory Surgical Center","authors":"H. Machado, J. Completo","doi":"10.4172/2155-6148.1000841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Several surgical procedures may have efficiency gains with the ambulatory methodology. Patient comorbidities control is key for successful procedures. Anesthetic drugs and neuromuscular blockade reversal strongly contribute to patient safety and satisfaction, allowing evolution to more complex procedures. Purpose: This study evaluated the financial impact on hospital annual income, when transitioning some surgical procedures from inpatient to ambulatory surgical program, with anesthesiology department assentment. Methods: A risk-adjustment method, based on a logistic regression model, calibrated with approximately 1.15 million episodes from Spanish and Portuguese hospitals was used. A list of procedures performed in Centro Hospitalar do Porto was subject to classification with the label ('Yes', 'No' or 'Maybe') regarding the possibility for ambulatory surgery, relying on sugammadex safety. Results: A total of 153 procedures were classified as 'Yes' or 'maybe' (n=16,944 inpatient episodes), in 2014. 73.4% of these episodes were already performed in ambulatory, but it was expected to reach 85.5%. Assuming a consumption of at least 1 inpatient day for each potentially ambulatory episode, an overconsumption of at least 2,044 inpatient days in 2014 was forecasted. The potential financing gain in 2014 would be 4.59 Million Euros. Discussion: To safely ambulatorize and improve revenue, not only patient selection must be optimized, but also safe routines and choices of correct short acting drugs (propofol, rocuronium), and definitive drug reversal policies (sugammadex), must be implemented. Conclusions: To ambulatorize some inpatient surgical procedures increased both case-mix values. These increased complexity values have a direct positive impact on the hospital income.","PeriodicalId":15000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Several surgical procedures may have efficiency gains with the ambulatory methodology. Patient comorbidities control is key for successful procedures. Anesthetic drugs and neuromuscular blockade reversal strongly contribute to patient safety and satisfaction, allowing evolution to more complex procedures. Purpose: This study evaluated the financial impact on hospital annual income, when transitioning some surgical procedures from inpatient to ambulatory surgical program, with anesthesiology department assentment. Methods: A risk-adjustment method, based on a logistic regression model, calibrated with approximately 1.15 million episodes from Spanish and Portuguese hospitals was used. A list of procedures performed in Centro Hospitalar do Porto was subject to classification with the label ('Yes', 'No' or 'Maybe') regarding the possibility for ambulatory surgery, relying on sugammadex safety. Results: A total of 153 procedures were classified as 'Yes' or 'maybe' (n=16,944 inpatient episodes), in 2014. 73.4% of these episodes were already performed in ambulatory, but it was expected to reach 85.5%. Assuming a consumption of at least 1 inpatient day for each potentially ambulatory episode, an overconsumption of at least 2,044 inpatient days in 2014 was forecasted. The potential financing gain in 2014 would be 4.59 Million Euros. Discussion: To safely ambulatorize and improve revenue, not only patient selection must be optimized, but also safe routines and choices of correct short acting drugs (propofol, rocuronium), and definitive drug reversal policies (sugammadex), must be implemented. Conclusions: To ambulatorize some inpatient surgical procedures increased both case-mix values. These increased complexity values have a direct positive impact on the hospital income.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增加手术复杂性的经济影响:在门诊手术中心,Sugammadex作为神经肌肉阻断逆转的更安全选择的贡献
介绍:几种外科手术可能有效率提高与门诊方法学。患者合并症的控制是手术成功的关键。麻醉药物和神经肌肉阻断逆转有力地促进了患者的安全性和满意度,允许进化到更复杂的程序。目的:本研究评估在麻醉科同意的情况下,某些外科手术由住院手术转为门诊手术对医院年收入的财务影响。方法:采用基于逻辑回归模型的风险调整方法,对来自西班牙和葡萄牙医院的约115万例病例进行校准。根据sugammadex的安全性,在波尔图中心医院进行的手术清单根据门诊手术的可能性进行了分类(“是”、“否”或“可能”)。结果:2014年共有153例手术被分类为“是”或“可能”(n=16,944例住院病例)。其中73.4%的患者已经在门诊就诊,但预计这一比例将达到85.5%。假设每一次潜在的门诊发作至少消耗1个住院日,预计2014年的过度消耗至少为2,044个住院日。2014年的潜在融资收益为459万欧元。讨论:为了安全门诊和提高收入,不仅必须优化患者选择,而且必须实施安全的常规和正确的短效药物(异丙酚、罗库溴铵)的选择,以及明确的药物逆转政策(sugammadex)。结论:一些住院手术的门诊化增加了两种病例组合值。这些增加的复杂性值对医院收入有直接的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Sutured on the Pulmonary Trunk and Relevant Clinical Consequences Study in a Simulated Scenario of the Influence of Training and Personality in the Resolution of Critical Situations in Anaesthesiology Residents Pulmonary Thrombosis in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Theory, Evidence, and Clinical Relevance to Resource-Limited Settings Management of Cerebropontine Angle Tumors on Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Facilitating Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Retrospective Observational Study Efficacy of Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block as Analgesic Modality in Clavicle Fractures: Exploring New Horizons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1