Eastern Promise: Assessing the Future of UK-India Trade

Institute of Economic Affairs Submitter
{"title":"Eastern Promise: Assessing the Future of UK-India Trade","authors":"Institute of Economic Affairs Submitter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3850596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India is at a crossroads. As the UK Prime Minister prepares to meet Indian leaders virtually, he promises an Enhanced Trade Partnership, possibly leading to a full Free Trade Agreement (FTA). There are important commercial reasons for this agreement, but more importantly, there are powerful geopolitical reasons. India could be brought into an alignment of nations, including the CPTPP members, as a bulwark against the negative impact of China’s market distortions and security policies. The UK may just have the right combination of offensive and defensive flexibility to be able to do a deal with India. The contours of that deal are emerging and involve key UK asks, such as financial services and legal services access, as well as Scotch whisky tariff reduction, and key Indian asks, such as movement of natural persons supplying services and the UK committing not to impose bans on Indian agriculture in violation of the WTO SPS agreement. There is a developing alignment of nations, which collectively promote pro-competitive regulation where countries interact with each other through equivalence and mutual recognition as opposed to regulatory harmonisation. India has to choose whether to align with these nations or others, such as China, which have a very different model. There are strong geopolitical reasons for India to join this grouping – which could be started with an FTA with the UK – relating to its difficult relationship with China and its need to secure support in the Indian Ocean. However, a number of obstacles remain for this future to be reached. India has recently taken actions against the property rights of foreign investors. Property rights form the bedrock of economic systems that leverage the forces of competition to generate economic growth. But India’s market signals on property rights are negative and risk undermining its global reputation and potential. When the Prime Minister meets the Indian PM, he should make it clear that while the UK welcomes a deeper relationship with India, this will depend on whether India endorses, in both word and deed, property rights protection, market competition, and open trade.","PeriodicalId":14394,"journal":{"name":"International Political Economy: Trade Policy eJournal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Economy: Trade Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3850596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India is at a crossroads. As the UK Prime Minister prepares to meet Indian leaders virtually, he promises an Enhanced Trade Partnership, possibly leading to a full Free Trade Agreement (FTA). There are important commercial reasons for this agreement, but more importantly, there are powerful geopolitical reasons. India could be brought into an alignment of nations, including the CPTPP members, as a bulwark against the negative impact of China’s market distortions and security policies. The UK may just have the right combination of offensive and defensive flexibility to be able to do a deal with India. The contours of that deal are emerging and involve key UK asks, such as financial services and legal services access, as well as Scotch whisky tariff reduction, and key Indian asks, such as movement of natural persons supplying services and the UK committing not to impose bans on Indian agriculture in violation of the WTO SPS agreement. There is a developing alignment of nations, which collectively promote pro-competitive regulation where countries interact with each other through equivalence and mutual recognition as opposed to regulatory harmonisation. India has to choose whether to align with these nations or others, such as China, which have a very different model. There are strong geopolitical reasons for India to join this grouping – which could be started with an FTA with the UK – relating to its difficult relationship with China and its need to secure support in the Indian Ocean. However, a number of obstacles remain for this future to be reached. India has recently taken actions against the property rights of foreign investors. Property rights form the bedrock of economic systems that leverage the forces of competition to generate economic growth. But India’s market signals on property rights are negative and risk undermining its global reputation and potential. When the Prime Minister meets the Indian PM, he should make it clear that while the UK welcomes a deeper relationship with India, this will depend on whether India endorses, in both word and deed, property rights protection, market competition, and open trade.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《东方承诺:评估英印贸易的未来》
印度正处于十字路口。英国首相准备会见印度领导人,他承诺加强贸易伙伴关系,可能导致全面的自由贸易协定(FTA)。达成这项协议有重要的商业原因,但更重要的是,有强大的地缘政治原因。印度可以加入包括CPTPP成员国在内的国家联盟,作为抵御中国市场扭曲和安全政策负面影响的堡垒。英国可能只是拥有进攻和防御灵活性的正确组合,能够与印度达成协议。该协议的轮廓正在浮现,涉及英国的关键要求,例如金融服务和法律服务准入,以及苏格兰威士忌关税降低;以及印度的关键要求,例如提供服务的自然人的流动,以及英国承诺不违反WTO SPS协议对印度农业实施禁令。一个是发展中国家联盟,它们共同推动有利于竞争的监管,各国通过平等和相互承认(而不是监管协调)相互作用。印度必须选择是与这些国家结盟,还是与其他国家结盟,比如中国,后者的模式截然不同。印度加入这个组织有很强的地缘政治原因——可能从与英国签订自由贸易协定开始——与印度与中国的艰难关系以及印度在印度洋获得支持的需要有关。然而,要实现这一未来仍有一些障碍。印度最近对外国投资者的财产权采取了行动。产权构成了经济制度的基石,这些制度利用竞争的力量来促进经济增长。但印度在产权方面的市场信号是负面的,有可能损害其全球声誉和潜力。当英国首相会见印度总理时,他应该明确表示,尽管英国欢迎与印度建立更深层次的关系,但这将取决于印度是否在言行上支持产权保护、市场竞争和开放贸易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trade Openness and Growth: A Network-Based Approach Rome and the Road to the Distant East El cambio estructural y las exportaciones en la economía colombiana (2005-2015) (Structural Change and Exports in the Colombian Economy (2005-2015)) Foreign Direct Investment, Global Value Chains, and Labor Rights: No Race-to-the-Bottom? The Impact of Global Value Chain on the Performance on SMEs Special Reference on East Asian Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1