Cash For Work Program At Nanga Pamolontian Village In Terms Of Good Enough Governance Perspective

Triadi Eka Asi Jayadiputera, S. Sumartono, M. Nuh, S. Sujarwoto
{"title":"Cash For Work Program At Nanga Pamolontian Village In Terms Of Good Enough Governance Perspective","authors":"Triadi Eka Asi Jayadiputera, S. Sumartono, M. Nuh, S. Sujarwoto","doi":"10.21776/ub.jpas.2022.007.01.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Good governance, which was originally expected to be able to solve problems in developing countries, turned out to meet many obstacles, one of which was the application of the one size fit for all pattern, which was then criticized by Grindle through the concept of Good Enough Governance (GEG). Cash For Work (CFW) Program which is one of the reform programs as an embodiment of good governance that involves community participation as labor. During its journey, the CFW encountered various problems in the field, so it was interesting to see how the CFW program was viewed from the perspective of GEG. This study aims to describe and analyze the characteristics of the arena, institutions and interests as well as actions and choices in the perspective of GEG in the implementation of CFW program in Nanga Pamolontian Village, Bulik District, Lamandau Regency, Central Kalimantan Province. This research method uses a qualitative case study approach. The results of this study are that in the implementation of CFW program they have not paid attention to the elements of GEG, both in the arena, institutions and interests and actions, this is because the agenda setting has not utilized official and unofficial channels to the fullest, related stakeholders such as the mass media and Non-Governmental Organizations, regional apparatus, local village assistants are not fully involved in the implementation of CFW, there are no technical regulations in the implementation of CFW, the Team for Facilitating the Use of Village Funds for CFW is not utilized, evaluation, guidance and supervision have not been carried out, lack of socialization and training for the team implementing activities.","PeriodicalId":53100,"journal":{"name":"JPAS Journal of Public Administration Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPAS Journal of Public Administration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpas.2022.007.01.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Good governance, which was originally expected to be able to solve problems in developing countries, turned out to meet many obstacles, one of which was the application of the one size fit for all pattern, which was then criticized by Grindle through the concept of Good Enough Governance (GEG). Cash For Work (CFW) Program which is one of the reform programs as an embodiment of good governance that involves community participation as labor. During its journey, the CFW encountered various problems in the field, so it was interesting to see how the CFW program was viewed from the perspective of GEG. This study aims to describe and analyze the characteristics of the arena, institutions and interests as well as actions and choices in the perspective of GEG in the implementation of CFW program in Nanga Pamolontian Village, Bulik District, Lamandau Regency, Central Kalimantan Province. This research method uses a qualitative case study approach. The results of this study are that in the implementation of CFW program they have not paid attention to the elements of GEG, both in the arena, institutions and interests and actions, this is because the agenda setting has not utilized official and unofficial channels to the fullest, related stakeholders such as the mass media and Non-Governmental Organizations, regional apparatus, local village assistants are not fully involved in the implementation of CFW, there are no technical regulations in the implementation of CFW, the Team for Facilitating the Use of Village Funds for CFW is not utilized, evaluation, guidance and supervision have not been carried out, lack of socialization and training for the team implementing activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从“足够好”治理的角度看南加帕莫伦提村的“以工代赈”项目
善治最初被期望能够解决发展中国家的问题,结果却遇到了许多障碍,其中之一是一刀切模式的应用,随后被格林德尔通过“足够好治理”(Good Enough governance, GEG)的概念进行了批评。“以工代赈”(CFW)项目是其中一个改革项目,体现了社区参与作为劳动的良好治理。在此过程中,CFW遇到了各种各样的问题,所以从GEG的角度来看待CFW项目是很有趣的。本研究旨在描述和分析GEG视角下,在加里曼丹省中部拉曼道县Bulik区Nanga Pamolontian村实施CFW项目的舞台特征、制度特征、利益特征以及行动和选择。本研究方法采用定性案例研究法。本研究的结果是,在CFW项目的实施过程中,无论是在舞台上、制度上,还是在利益和行动上,他们都没有注意到GEG的要素,这是因为议程设置没有充分利用官方和非官方的渠道,相关利益相关者如大众媒体和非政府组织、区域机构、当地村助产员等没有充分参与到CFW的实施中来。农村扶贫实施没有技术规范,农村扶贫资金使用促进小组没有发挥作用,没有进行评估、指导和监督,缺乏对小组实施活动的社会化和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
SettingsThe Efficacy of Community Participation Towards Land Use Planning in South African Local Municipalities Cultural Heritage Accounting for Participatory Governance: A Participatory Action Reseach in Pata'padang Village Implementation of Federal Constituency Projects and the Development of Infrastructure in Kogi State (2012-2022) Capital Grants For Local Infrastructure Provision In Perspective Of Allocative Efficiency: Evidence From Indonesia Perception of Quality Service Provision in Local Government Authorities in Tanzania: A Citizen Participation Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1