Inadvert Intravenous Administration of Local Anaesthetic During Labour: A Case Report

P. A. Ramos, T. Barreto, Ana Paula Alves, H. Machado
{"title":"Inadvert Intravenous Administration of Local Anaesthetic During Labour: A Case Report","authors":"P. A. Ramos, T. Barreto, Ana Paula Alves, H. Machado","doi":"10.4172/2155-6148.1000829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Local anaesthetics are widely used in the daily practice of the anaesthesiologists. Although in most part of the times no adverse effect are observed secondary to its use, accidental intravascular injection can be related to serious consequences. The objective of this case report is to describe an accidental intravascular administration of a local anesthetic during labour epidural analgesia. Methods: Clinical records of a complete epidural labour analgesia case were collected. Results: During an epidural blockade for labour analgesia, local anesthetic toxicity was acutely diagnosed after a bolus dose. This epidural catheter was promptly removed. Following the parturient informed consent and will, a second epidural catheter was introduced at a different lumbar level, with a subsequent successful analgesia, with no complications registered, with a normal delivery in the due time, with no morbidities either to the mother and the newborn. Discussion: After an incomplete success of the first bolus when the first epidural catheter has been used, a diagnostic bolus of Lidocaine showed that this catheter was actually in an intravascular space. The diagnostic was purely clinical, given the highly typical clinical signs that were observed. These signs were so clear that no other diagnostic procedure was necessary. The fact that labour analgesia was resumed after a second catheter was introduced (this time with complete success) showed a good confidence relationship between doctor and patient, which is of paramount importance during Anesthesiology practice. Conclusions: Intravascular injection of local anaesthetics could be prevented following some safe steps. In cases when it is not primarily identified, a transparent dressing could allow observation of blood inside catheter and help to make the diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":15000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Local anaesthetics are widely used in the daily practice of the anaesthesiologists. Although in most part of the times no adverse effect are observed secondary to its use, accidental intravascular injection can be related to serious consequences. The objective of this case report is to describe an accidental intravascular administration of a local anesthetic during labour epidural analgesia. Methods: Clinical records of a complete epidural labour analgesia case were collected. Results: During an epidural blockade for labour analgesia, local anesthetic toxicity was acutely diagnosed after a bolus dose. This epidural catheter was promptly removed. Following the parturient informed consent and will, a second epidural catheter was introduced at a different lumbar level, with a subsequent successful analgesia, with no complications registered, with a normal delivery in the due time, with no morbidities either to the mother and the newborn. Discussion: After an incomplete success of the first bolus when the first epidural catheter has been used, a diagnostic bolus of Lidocaine showed that this catheter was actually in an intravascular space. The diagnostic was purely clinical, given the highly typical clinical signs that were observed. These signs were so clear that no other diagnostic procedure was necessary. The fact that labour analgesia was resumed after a second catheter was introduced (this time with complete success) showed a good confidence relationship between doctor and patient, which is of paramount importance during Anesthesiology practice. Conclusions: Intravascular injection of local anaesthetics could be prevented following some safe steps. In cases when it is not primarily identified, a transparent dressing could allow observation of blood inside catheter and help to make the diagnosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分娩过程中不小心静脉注射局麻1例报告
局部麻醉在麻醉师的日常实践中被广泛使用。虽然在大多数情况下没有观察到其使用后的不良反应,但意外的血管内注射可能导致严重后果。本病例报告的目的是描述意外的血管内给药局麻药在分娩硬膜外镇痛。方法:收集1例完全硬膜外分娩镇痛的临床资料。结果:在硬膜外阻滞分娩镇痛中,局部麻醉毒性在给药后被急性诊断。硬膜外导管立即取出。在征得产妇知情同意和意愿后,在不同腰段插入第二根硬膜外导管,随后成功镇痛,无并发症记录,如期正常分娩,母亲和新生儿均无发病。讨论:在第一次使用硬膜外导管的不完全成功后,诊断性的利多卡因剂量显示该导管实际上位于血管内。鉴于观察到的高度典型的临床症状,诊断纯粹是临床的。这些症状非常明显,不需要其他的诊断程序。事实上,在引入第二根导管后,分娩镇痛恢复了(这次完全成功),这表明医生和病人之间有良好的信任关系,这在麻醉学实践中是至关重要的。结论:采取一些安全措施可以防止血管内注射局麻药。在无法初步识别的情况下,透明敷料可以观察导管内的血液并有助于诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Sutured on the Pulmonary Trunk and Relevant Clinical Consequences Study in a Simulated Scenario of the Influence of Training and Personality in the Resolution of Critical Situations in Anaesthesiology Residents Pulmonary Thrombosis in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Theory, Evidence, and Clinical Relevance to Resource-Limited Settings Management of Cerebropontine Angle Tumors on Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Facilitating Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Retrospective Observational Study Efficacy of Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block as Analgesic Modality in Clavicle Fractures: Exploring New Horizons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1