Identifying socio-psychological constructs and beliefs underlying farmers’ intention to adopt on-farm silos

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.njas.2020.100322
Elisangela Domingues Vaz, Régio Márcio Toesca Gimenes, João Augusto Rossi Borges
{"title":"Identifying socio-psychological constructs and beliefs underlying farmers’ intention to adopt on-farm silos","authors":"Elisangela Domingues Vaz,&nbsp;Régio Márcio Toesca Gimenes,&nbsp;João Augusto Rossi Borges","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2020.100322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Brazil is one of the leading countries in production and exportation of grains. However, most grain production regions in Brazil do not have an adequate storage capacity, which result in losses for the grain supply chain. A possible solution to increase storage capacity is the adoption of on-farm silos. We used the Reasoned Action Approach as a framework to identify the impact of attitude, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control on farmers’ intention to adopt on-farm silos and to identify the most important beliefs underlying their intentions to adopt it. A survey was conducted with 170 farmers in Brazil. Data was analyzed by means of Partial-Least-Square Structural Equation Modeling and MIMIC models. Results showed that attitude was the main determinant of intention, followed by perceived behavioral control and injunctive norms. Results also showed that “Sell grains at higher price”, “Have independence in relation to grain storage firms”, and “Have control over grain classification” are the most important beliefs that drive attitude; “Bank” is the most important belief that drive perceived norm; and “Have easy access to silos”, “Prioritize other investments”, and “Need skilled workers” are the most important beliefs that drive perceived behavioral control. These results revealed important implications to design public and private interventions aimed to stimulate the adoption of on-farm silos.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 100322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2020.100322","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573521419300703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Brazil is one of the leading countries in production and exportation of grains. However, most grain production regions in Brazil do not have an adequate storage capacity, which result in losses for the grain supply chain. A possible solution to increase storage capacity is the adoption of on-farm silos. We used the Reasoned Action Approach as a framework to identify the impact of attitude, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control on farmers’ intention to adopt on-farm silos and to identify the most important beliefs underlying their intentions to adopt it. A survey was conducted with 170 farmers in Brazil. Data was analyzed by means of Partial-Least-Square Structural Equation Modeling and MIMIC models. Results showed that attitude was the main determinant of intention, followed by perceived behavioral control and injunctive norms. Results also showed that “Sell grains at higher price”, “Have independence in relation to grain storage firms”, and “Have control over grain classification” are the most important beliefs that drive attitude; “Bank” is the most important belief that drive perceived norm; and “Have easy access to silos”, “Prioritize other investments”, and “Need skilled workers” are the most important beliefs that drive perceived behavioral control. These results revealed important implications to design public and private interventions aimed to stimulate the adoption of on-farm silos.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定农民采用农场筒仓的意向背后的社会心理结构和信念
巴西是粮食生产和出口的主要国家之一。然而,巴西的大多数粮食产区没有足够的储存能力,这给粮食供应链造成了损失。增加储存容量的一个可能的解决方案是采用农场筒仓。我们使用理性行动方法作为框架来确定态度、感知规范和感知行为控制对农民采用农场筒仓的意图的影响,并确定他们采用筒仓的意图背后最重要的信念。对巴西170名农民进行了一项调查。采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型和MIMIC模型对数据进行分析。结果表明,态度是意向的主要决定因素,其次是感知行为控制和命令规范。结果还显示,“高价卖粮”、“对粮仓企业有独立性”和“对粮食分类有控制权”是影响态度的最重要信念;“银行”是驱动感知规范的最重要信念;“容易进入竖井”、“优先考虑其他投资”和“需要熟练工人”是驱动感知行为控制的最重要信念。这些结果揭示了设计旨在刺激采用农场筒仓的公共和私人干预措施的重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences
Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 农林科学-农业综合
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, published since 1952, is the quarterly journal of the Royal Netherlands Society for Agricultural Sciences. NJAS aspires to be the main scientific platform for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research on complex and persistent problems in agricultural production, food and nutrition security and natural resource management. The societal and technical challenges in these domains require research integrating scientific disciplines and finding novel combinations of methodologies and conceptual frameworks. Moreover, the composite nature of these problems and challenges fits transdisciplinary research approaches embedded in constructive interactions with policy and practice and crossing the boundaries between science and society. Engaging with societal debate and creating decision space is an important task of research about the diverse impacts of novel agri-food technologies or policies. The international nature of food and nutrition security (e.g. global value chains, standardisation, trade), environmental problems (e.g. climate change or competing claims on natural resources), and risks related to agriculture (e.g. the spread of plant and animal diseases) challenges researchers to focus not only on lower levels of aggregation, but certainly to use interdisciplinary research to unravel linkages between scales or to analyse dynamics at higher levels of aggregation. NJAS recognises that the widely acknowledged need for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research, also increasingly expressed by policy makers and practitioners, needs a platform for creative researchers and out-of-the-box thinking in the domains of agriculture, food and environment. The journal aims to offer space for grounded, critical, and open discussions that advance the development and application of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research methodologies in the agricultural and life sciences.
期刊最新文献
Identifying socio-psychological constructs and beliefs underlying farmers’ intention to adopt on-farm silos Motivational factors influencing farming practices in northern Ghana Is the farmer field school still relevant? Case studies from Malawi and Indonesia The role of shade trees in influencing farmers’ adoption of cocoa agroforestry systems: Insight from semi-deciduous rain forest agroecological zone of Ghana Public private collaborations amidst an emergency plant disease outbreak: The Australian experience with biosecurity for Panama disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1