Motivational factors influencing farming practices in northern Ghana

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.njas.2020.100326
S. Mellon-Bedi , K. Descheemaeker , B. Hundie-Kotu , S. Frimpong , J.C.J. Groot
{"title":"Motivational factors influencing farming practices in northern Ghana","authors":"S. Mellon-Bedi ,&nbsp;K. Descheemaeker ,&nbsp;B. Hundie-Kotu ,&nbsp;S. Frimpong ,&nbsp;J.C.J. Groot","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2020.100326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Socio-economic factors that influence the adoption of management practices and technologies by farmers have received wide attention in the adoption literature, but the effects of socio-psychological farmer features such as perceptions and motivations have been analysed to a lesser extent. Using farm household survey data from three regions in northern Ghana, this study explores farmers’ motivations and perceived adoption impediments for three sustainable intensification practices (SIPs): improved maize varieties, cropping system strategies, and combined SIPs (i.e. improved maize and cropping system strategies), and the effect of motivational factors on decisions to adopt SIPs. First, explorative factor analysis (EFA) was used in identifying factors of motivations and impediments for adoption of SIPs. Then, a multinomial logit model was used to analyze the effect of socio-economic farm characteristics and motivational factors on farmers’ decisions to adopt SIPs. EFA identified three motivational factors: <em>personal satisfaction</em>, <em>eco-diversity</em> and <em>eco-efficiency</em>, which differed in importance between the three regions. Across these regions, higher scores for aspects of <em>personal satisfaction</em> were associated with lower interest in improved maize varieties compared to cropping system strategies, while the opposite was true for <em>eco-efficiency</em> which was related to a stronger preference for improved maize varieties. <em>Uncertainty</em>, <em>absence of social support</em>, and <em>resource constraints</em> were identified as impediment factors. The logit model demonstrated that extension services seemed to support the use of improved maize varieties more than the implementation of cropping system strategies. We conclude that motivational factors significantly influence farmer adoption decisions regarding sustainable intensification practices and should be considered systematically in combination with socio-economic farm features and external drivers to inform on-farm innovation processes and supporting policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 100326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2020.100326","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573521418301404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Socio-economic factors that influence the adoption of management practices and technologies by farmers have received wide attention in the adoption literature, but the effects of socio-psychological farmer features such as perceptions and motivations have been analysed to a lesser extent. Using farm household survey data from three regions in northern Ghana, this study explores farmers’ motivations and perceived adoption impediments for three sustainable intensification practices (SIPs): improved maize varieties, cropping system strategies, and combined SIPs (i.e. improved maize and cropping system strategies), and the effect of motivational factors on decisions to adopt SIPs. First, explorative factor analysis (EFA) was used in identifying factors of motivations and impediments for adoption of SIPs. Then, a multinomial logit model was used to analyze the effect of socio-economic farm characteristics and motivational factors on farmers’ decisions to adopt SIPs. EFA identified three motivational factors: personal satisfaction, eco-diversity and eco-efficiency, which differed in importance between the three regions. Across these regions, higher scores for aspects of personal satisfaction were associated with lower interest in improved maize varieties compared to cropping system strategies, while the opposite was true for eco-efficiency which was related to a stronger preference for improved maize varieties. Uncertainty, absence of social support, and resource constraints were identified as impediment factors. The logit model demonstrated that extension services seemed to support the use of improved maize varieties more than the implementation of cropping system strategies. We conclude that motivational factors significantly influence farmer adoption decisions regarding sustainable intensification practices and should be considered systematically in combination with socio-economic farm features and external drivers to inform on-farm innovation processes and supporting policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响加纳北部农业实践的激励因素
影响农民采用管理做法和技术的社会经济因素在采用文献中得到了广泛关注,但对农民社会心理特征(如观念和动机)的影响的分析程度较低。本研究利用来自加纳北部三个地区的农户调查数据,探讨了农民对三种可持续集约化实践(SIPs)的动机和感知的采用障碍:改良玉米品种、种植制度战略和综合SIPs(即改良玉米和种植制度战略),以及动机因素对采用SIPs决策的影响。首先,探索性因素分析(EFA)用于确定采用sip的动机和障碍因素。在此基础上,运用多项logit模型分析了农户社会经济特征和动机因素对农户实施sip决策的影响。全民教育确定了三个激励因素:个人满意度、生态多样性和生态效率,它们在三个区域之间的重要性不同。在这些地区,与种植制度策略相比,个人满意度方面的得分越高,对改良玉米品种的兴趣就越低,而生态效率方面的得分则相反,对改良玉米品种的偏好越强。不确定性、缺乏社会支持和资源限制被认为是障碍因素。logit模型表明,推广服务似乎更支持使用改良玉米品种,而不是实施种植制度战略。我们的结论是,激励因素显著影响农民对可持续集约化实践的采用决策,应与农场的社会经济特征和外部驱动因素相结合,系统地考虑,为农场创新过程和支持政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences
Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 农林科学-农业综合
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, published since 1952, is the quarterly journal of the Royal Netherlands Society for Agricultural Sciences. NJAS aspires to be the main scientific platform for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research on complex and persistent problems in agricultural production, food and nutrition security and natural resource management. The societal and technical challenges in these domains require research integrating scientific disciplines and finding novel combinations of methodologies and conceptual frameworks. Moreover, the composite nature of these problems and challenges fits transdisciplinary research approaches embedded in constructive interactions with policy and practice and crossing the boundaries between science and society. Engaging with societal debate and creating decision space is an important task of research about the diverse impacts of novel agri-food technologies or policies. The international nature of food and nutrition security (e.g. global value chains, standardisation, trade), environmental problems (e.g. climate change or competing claims on natural resources), and risks related to agriculture (e.g. the spread of plant and animal diseases) challenges researchers to focus not only on lower levels of aggregation, but certainly to use interdisciplinary research to unravel linkages between scales or to analyse dynamics at higher levels of aggregation. NJAS recognises that the widely acknowledged need for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research, also increasingly expressed by policy makers and practitioners, needs a platform for creative researchers and out-of-the-box thinking in the domains of agriculture, food and environment. The journal aims to offer space for grounded, critical, and open discussions that advance the development and application of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research methodologies in the agricultural and life sciences.
期刊最新文献
Identifying socio-psychological constructs and beliefs underlying farmers’ intention to adopt on-farm silos Motivational factors influencing farming practices in northern Ghana Is the farmer field school still relevant? Case studies from Malawi and Indonesia The role of shade trees in influencing farmers’ adoption of cocoa agroforestry systems: Insight from semi-deciduous rain forest agroecological zone of Ghana Public private collaborations amidst an emergency plant disease outbreak: The Australian experience with biosecurity for Panama disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1