The Play of the Line: "Presence Effects" and the Voice of the Latent in Wordsworth's Prelude

IF 0.4 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas Pub Date : 2019-12-27 DOI:10.1353/pan.2020.0001
Arturo Zilleruelo
{"title":"The Play of the Line: \"Presence Effects\" and the Voice of the Latent in Wordsworth's Prelude","authors":"Arturo Zilleruelo","doi":"10.1353/pan.2020.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:There is a tradition of Wordsworth criticism that begins with William Empson in 1951, continues with Christopher Ricks in 1971 and Isobel Armstrong in 2000, and concludes with Anne-Lise François in 2008, which considers the disruptive effects of the poet's blank verse lines upon his poetry's semantic or rhetorical function. I seek to revive this tradition by invoking Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht's articulation of the relationship between what he calls \"presence effects\" and \"meaning effects\" to emphasize instances where individual lines in Wordsworth's Prelude produce disruptions or ambiguities that subvert the governing rhetoric of the verse structures in which they reside. I revisit several of the poem's most iconic passages to explore how certain suggestive lines and line breaks form an affective and material counter-rhetoric that undermines the poem's narratives of personal growth and redeemed trauma. I also consider the extent to which these disruptions may represent the presentification of \"the latent\" as Gumbrecht defines it.","PeriodicalId":42435,"journal":{"name":"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","volume":"1 1","pages":"25 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pan.2020.0001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:There is a tradition of Wordsworth criticism that begins with William Empson in 1951, continues with Christopher Ricks in 1971 and Isobel Armstrong in 2000, and concludes with Anne-Lise François in 2008, which considers the disruptive effects of the poet's blank verse lines upon his poetry's semantic or rhetorical function. I seek to revive this tradition by invoking Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht's articulation of the relationship between what he calls "presence effects" and "meaning effects" to emphasize instances where individual lines in Wordsworth's Prelude produce disruptions or ambiguities that subvert the governing rhetoric of the verse structures in which they reside. I revisit several of the poem's most iconic passages to explore how certain suggestive lines and line breaks form an affective and material counter-rhetoric that undermines the poem's narratives of personal growth and redeemed trauma. I also consider the extent to which these disruptions may represent the presentification of "the latent" as Gumbrecht defines it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
台词的发挥:华兹华斯《序曲》中的“在场效应”与潜伏者的声音
摘要:华兹华斯的批评传统始于1951年的威廉·恩普森,接着是1971年的克里斯托弗·里克斯和2000年的伊泽贝尔·阿姆斯特朗,最后是2008年的安妮-莉斯·弗朗萨雷索,研究了诗人的无韵诗句对其诗歌语义或修辞功能的破坏性影响。我试图通过引用汉斯·乌尔里希·冈布莱希特对他所谓的"存在效应"和"意义效应"之间关系的阐述来复兴这一传统,以强调华兹华斯《序曲》中的个别诗句产生干扰或歧义的例子,这些干扰或歧义颠覆了它们所处的诗歌结构的主导修辞。我重新审视了这首诗中最具代表性的几段,以探索某些暗含的线条和断行是如何形成一种情感和物质上的反修辞的,这种反修辞破坏了这首诗对个人成长和救赎创伤的叙述。我还考虑了这些破坏在多大程度上可能代表了冈布雷希特所定义的“潜在”的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Partial Answers is an international, peer reviewed, interdisciplinary journal that focuses on the study of literature and the history of ideas. This interdisciplinary component is responsible for combining analysis of literary works with discussions of historical and theoretical issues. The journal publishes articles on various national literatures including Anglophone, Hebrew, Yiddish, German, Russian, and, predominately, English literature. Partial Answers would appeal to literature scholars, teachers, and students in addition to scholars in philosophy, cultural studies, and intellectual history.
期刊最新文献
(Re)directing Literature to Justice: Ursula K. Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” The Painter and the Muse: On Archetypes, Complexes and the Anti-Jungian Quest for Mother in Kurt Vonnegut’s Bluebeard The Bo/ald Woman in Auschwitz: From Abjection to Writing The Book of Esther: Notes for a Traditional Reading Kinship Novels of Early Modern Korea: Between Genealogical Time and the Domestic Everyday by Ksenia Chizhova (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1