Kinship Novels of Early Modern Korea: Between Genealogical Time and the Domestic Everyday by Ksenia Chizhova (review)

IF 0.4 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1353/pan.2023.a899750
Francisco Gómez Martos
{"title":"Kinship Novels of Early Modern Korea: Between Genealogical Time and the Domestic Everyday by Ksenia Chizhova (review)","authors":"Francisco Gómez Martos","doi":"10.1353/pan.2023.a899750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ded in other things and systems. All existing sociocultural, political, and (post) colonial contexts attest to the centrality of interconnectedness even when the systems exclude and oppress. We undoubtedly need classification, boundaries, and solidarities to function as a society, but not in the ways in which these are carried out in colonial contexts through violence, erasure, and forgetting. One problem with the book, perhaps inherent in the nature of the questions it asks, is that it refers to texts and theoretical concepts either written by European authors or in European languages. For instance, chapter 3 discusses India, using Forster’s novel, as if India had no history prior to colonial rule. Indeed, the author attempts to underscore the limits but also the potentialities of the colonial encounter, but doing so obscures India and its history. Despite this challenge, which is typical of projects engaging with colonialism, Modernism after Postcolonialism develops tools to comprehend the current “unequal” systems, and though such efforts may be thwarted, given creativity and imagination, existing systems can be challenged and transformed, and anxieties replaced by harmony.","PeriodicalId":42435,"journal":{"name":"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","volume":"158 1","pages":"374 - 377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pan.2023.a899750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ded in other things and systems. All existing sociocultural, political, and (post) colonial contexts attest to the centrality of interconnectedness even when the systems exclude and oppress. We undoubtedly need classification, boundaries, and solidarities to function as a society, but not in the ways in which these are carried out in colonial contexts through violence, erasure, and forgetting. One problem with the book, perhaps inherent in the nature of the questions it asks, is that it refers to texts and theoretical concepts either written by European authors or in European languages. For instance, chapter 3 discusses India, using Forster’s novel, as if India had no history prior to colonial rule. Indeed, the author attempts to underscore the limits but also the potentialities of the colonial encounter, but doing so obscures India and its history. Despite this challenge, which is typical of projects engaging with colonialism, Modernism after Postcolonialism develops tools to comprehend the current “unequal” systems, and though such efforts may be thwarted, given creativity and imagination, existing systems can be challenged and transformed, and anxieties replaced by harmony.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近代早期韩国亲属小说:在家谱时间与家庭日常之间克谢尼娅·奇若娃(书评)
在其他事物和系统中。所有现存的社会文化、政治和(后)殖民背景都证明了相互联系的中心地位,即使在系统排斥和压迫的情况下也是如此。毫无疑问,作为一个社会,我们需要分类、边界和团结来发挥作用,但不是以殖民时期暴力、抹去和遗忘的方式来实现这些。这本书的一个问题,也许是它提出的问题的本质所固有的,是它引用了由欧洲作者或用欧洲语言写的文本和理论概念。例如,第三章讨论印度,使用福斯特的小说,好像印度在殖民统治之前没有历史。事实上,作者试图强调殖民遭遇的局限性和潜力,但这样做模糊了印度和它的历史。尽管存在这一挑战,这是与殖民主义有关的项目的典型挑战,后殖民主义后的现代主义开发了理解当前“不平等”制度的工具,尽管这种努力可能会受阻,但鉴于创造力和想象力,现有制度可以受到挑战和改造,和谐取代焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Partial Answers is an international, peer reviewed, interdisciplinary journal that focuses on the study of literature and the history of ideas. This interdisciplinary component is responsible for combining analysis of literary works with discussions of historical and theoretical issues. The journal publishes articles on various national literatures including Anglophone, Hebrew, Yiddish, German, Russian, and, predominately, English literature. Partial Answers would appeal to literature scholars, teachers, and students in addition to scholars in philosophy, cultural studies, and intellectual history.
期刊最新文献
(Re)directing Literature to Justice: Ursula K. Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” The Painter and the Muse: On Archetypes, Complexes and the Anti-Jungian Quest for Mother in Kurt Vonnegut’s Bluebeard The Bo/ald Woman in Auschwitz: From Abjection to Writing The Book of Esther: Notes for a Traditional Reading Kinship Novels of Early Modern Korea: Between Genealogical Time and the Domestic Everyday by Ksenia Chizhova (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1