Seismic response of rigid-drainage pile-superstructure-quay wall system subjected to lateral spreading

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering Pub Date : 2023-01-26 DOI:10.1680/jgeen.22.00147
Zhi-xiong Chen, Can Liu, Chenglong Wang, Xuan-chen Ding, Yu-min Chen, Wengang Zhang
{"title":"Seismic response of rigid-drainage pile-superstructure-quay wall system subjected to lateral spreading","authors":"Zhi-xiong Chen, Can Liu, Chenglong Wang, Xuan-chen Ding, Yu-min Chen, Wengang Zhang","doi":"10.1680/jgeen.22.00147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many examples of earthquake damage show that liquefied lateral spreading is the main cause of pile foundation failure. Rigid-drainage piles installed two drainage grooves with plastic drainage plates are a new type of liquefaction-resistant pile that can take into account the bearing capacity and drainage function. In this paper, a series of 1-g shaking table tests were carried out to analyse the seismic response of a rigid-drainage pile-superstructure-quay (RSQ) wall system subjected to lateral spreading. Three levels of earthquake intensities, including small earthquakes (peak ground acceleration, PGA=0.05 g), moderate earthquakes (PGA=0.1 g), and large earthquakes (PGA=0.2 g), were investigated. The improvement in the anti-liquefaction performance of the rigid-drainage piles was comparatively analysed. Moreover, the influences of far-field and near-field ground motions were also discussed. The experimental results showed that rigid-drainage piles could effectively reduce the liquefaction degree and the horizontal flow of the sand stratum. In addition, the internal force and displacement of the superstructure built on drainage piles were small. The observations of the influence of far-field and near-field ground motions indicated that the seismic response of near-field ground motion was more significant than that of far-field ground motion, but the effect of far-field ground motion could not be disregarded. The results of these tests could provide useful information for the design of rigid-drainage pile groups in a typical pile-superstructure-quay wall system.","PeriodicalId":54572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.22.00147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many examples of earthquake damage show that liquefied lateral spreading is the main cause of pile foundation failure. Rigid-drainage piles installed two drainage grooves with plastic drainage plates are a new type of liquefaction-resistant pile that can take into account the bearing capacity and drainage function. In this paper, a series of 1-g shaking table tests were carried out to analyse the seismic response of a rigid-drainage pile-superstructure-quay (RSQ) wall system subjected to lateral spreading. Three levels of earthquake intensities, including small earthquakes (peak ground acceleration, PGA=0.05 g), moderate earthquakes (PGA=0.1 g), and large earthquakes (PGA=0.2 g), were investigated. The improvement in the anti-liquefaction performance of the rigid-drainage piles was comparatively analysed. Moreover, the influences of far-field and near-field ground motions were also discussed. The experimental results showed that rigid-drainage piles could effectively reduce the liquefaction degree and the horizontal flow of the sand stratum. In addition, the internal force and displacement of the superstructure built on drainage piles were small. The observations of the influence of far-field and near-field ground motions indicated that the seismic response of near-field ground motion was more significant than that of far-field ground motion, but the effect of far-field ground motion could not be disregarded. The results of these tests could provide useful information for the design of rigid-drainage pile groups in a typical pile-superstructure-quay wall system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
横向扩展作用下刚性排水桩-上部结构-码头墙体体系的地震响应
许多地震破坏实例表明,液化横向扩展是桩基破坏的主要原因。刚性排水桩是一种集承载力和排水功能于一体的新型抗液化桩。本文通过一系列1 g振动台试验,分析了刚性排水桩-上部结构-码头(RSQ)墙体体系在侧向扩展作用下的地震响应。研究了小地震(峰值地面加速度,PGA=0.05 g)、中地震(PGA=0.1 g)和大地震(PGA=0.2 g)三个级别的地震烈度。对刚性排水桩抗液化性能的提高进行了比较分析。此外,还讨论了远场和近场地面运动的影响。试验结果表明,刚性排水桩能有效降低砂土层的液化程度和水平流动。此外,排水桩上部结构的内力和位移较小。对远场和近场地震动影响的观测表明,近场地震动的地震响应比远场地震动更显著,但远场地震动的影响不可忽视。试验结果可为典型桩-上部结构-岸墙体系的刚性排水桩群设计提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
68
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Geotechnical Engineering provides a forum for the publication of high quality, topical and relevant technical papers covering all aspects of geotechnical research, design, construction and performance. The journal aims to be of interest to those civil, structural or geotechnical engineering practitioners wishing to develop a greater understanding of the influence of geotechnics on the built environment.
期刊最新文献
A case history of monitoring a wide pile group Part I: geology, single pile analysis and testing, and monitoring data Torsional vibration of a tapered pile considering circumferential support of surrounding soil Applicability of construction dewatering techniques for randomly fractured rock Sensitivity investigation of drilling efficiency to operational parameters of a drifter Hyperbolic load-displacement analysis of helical and expanded piles: database approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1