Reflections on intersectionality: a journey through the worlds of migration research, policy and advocacy

T. Bastia, K. Datta, K. Hujo, N. Piper, Matthew Walsham
{"title":"Reflections on intersectionality: a journey through the worlds of migration research, policy and advocacy","authors":"T. Bastia, K. Datta, K. Hujo, N. Piper, Matthew Walsham","doi":"10.1080/0966369X.2022.2126826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The term ‘intersectionality’ is usually attributed to Kimberlé Crenshaw, a legal scholar, who coined the term in 1989. In this paper, we reflect on how the concept has travelled through both space and time. We trace the longer history and more complex geography of intersectional approaches rooted in grassroots women’s movements in the Global South, where radical claims were made against the dominance of white, middle-class women’s analysis of the situation of women in the world. These, together with the Black women’s movement in the US, paved the way for the emergence and coining of the term intersectionality. We then reflect on how the concept travelled in three domains of migration-related knowledge: academic research, international policy and advocacy politics. We find that, while some academic research is true to the original politics of intersectionality, there is also some research that has strayed much further away from the original aims of intersectionality, to the extent that we would question whether it can be called intersectional at all. In international policy, we find that the original radicalism of the term has been watered down in the translation of the term into policy targets and measurements. Finally, in advocacy politics we find the greatest continuity with the original aims of the term.","PeriodicalId":12513,"journal":{"name":"Gender, Place & Culture","volume":"65 1","pages":"460 - 483"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender, Place & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2022.2126826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The term ‘intersectionality’ is usually attributed to Kimberlé Crenshaw, a legal scholar, who coined the term in 1989. In this paper, we reflect on how the concept has travelled through both space and time. We trace the longer history and more complex geography of intersectional approaches rooted in grassroots women’s movements in the Global South, where radical claims were made against the dominance of white, middle-class women’s analysis of the situation of women in the world. These, together with the Black women’s movement in the US, paved the way for the emergence and coining of the term intersectionality. We then reflect on how the concept travelled in three domains of migration-related knowledge: academic research, international policy and advocacy politics. We find that, while some academic research is true to the original politics of intersectionality, there is also some research that has strayed much further away from the original aims of intersectionality, to the extent that we would question whether it can be called intersectional at all. In international policy, we find that the original radicalism of the term has been watered down in the translation of the term into policy targets and measurements. Finally, in advocacy politics we find the greatest continuity with the original aims of the term.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对交叉性的反思:穿越移民研究、政策和倡导世界的旅程
“交叉性”一词通常被认为是法律学者金伯利·勒尔·克伦肖在1989年创造的。在本文中,我们反思了这个概念是如何在空间和时间上传播的。我们追溯了根植于全球南方基层妇女运动的交叉方法的更悠久的历史和更复杂的地理位置,这些运动提出了反对白人统治的激进主张,中产阶级妇女对世界妇女状况的分析。这些与美国黑人妇女运动一起,为“交叉性”一词的出现和创造铺平了道路。然后,我们反思了这一概念是如何在三个与移民相关的知识领域传播的:学术研究、国际政策和倡导政治。我们发现,虽然一些学术研究忠于交叉性的原始政治,但也有一些研究偏离了交叉性的原始目标,以至于我们质疑它是否可以被称为交叉性。在国际政策中,我们发现,在将该术语翻译为政策目标和措施时,该术语最初的激进主义已被淡化。最后,在倡导政治中,我们发现这个词与最初的目的有最大的连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closedness and openness in Tehran; a feminist critique of Sennett Gendering the BRI: a viewpoint The gendered body during Covid-19: views from Australia, the United Kingdom, and Japan - Introduction to themed section (Re)making live-in or live-out choice: the lived experience of Filipina migrant domestic workers in Macao Gendered experiences during COVID-19 in Turkey and the meaning of home
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1