Why Evaluate the Sunscreen Active Oxybenzone (Benzophenone-3) for Carcinogenicity and Reproductive Toxicology or Consider it Unsafe for Human Use?

DiNardo Jc, Downs Ca
{"title":"Why Evaluate the Sunscreen Active Oxybenzone (Benzophenone-3) for Carcinogenicity and Reproductive Toxicology or Consider it Unsafe for Human Use?","authors":"DiNardo Jc, Downs Ca","doi":"10.33425/2690-537x.1005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On February 26, 2019, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) published an update to the Sunscreen Drug Products for Overthe-Counter Human Use in the Federal Register [1], requesting additional information on 12 petroleum-based sunscreen actives (cinoxate, dioxybenzone, ensulizole, homosalate, meradimate, octinoxate, octisalate, octocrylene, padimate O, sulisobenzone, oxybenzone and avobenzone). This is because the public record does not currently contain sufficient data to support that these drugs are Generally Recognized as Safe and Effective (GRASE). The FDA went on to conduct and publish a small clinical trail [2] to determine whether four of these drugs (avobenzone, oxybenzone, octocrylene, and ecamsule) absorb into the systemic circulation and whether they would exceed the FDA level for toxicological concern (0.5 ng/mL). The data collected demonstrated that all four sunscreen drugs absorbed through the skin and into the blood, and accumulated above the 0.5 ng/mL level within the first day (4 applications) of the study. Oxybenzone exceeded the level of concern after the first application demonstrating an overall maximum plasma concentration between 169.3 and 209.6 ng/mL for concentrations ranging from 4% to 6% in products, respectively.","PeriodicalId":11152,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2690-537x.1005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

On February 26, 2019, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) published an update to the Sunscreen Drug Products for Overthe-Counter Human Use in the Federal Register [1], requesting additional information on 12 petroleum-based sunscreen actives (cinoxate, dioxybenzone, ensulizole, homosalate, meradimate, octinoxate, octisalate, octocrylene, padimate O, sulisobenzone, oxybenzone and avobenzone). This is because the public record does not currently contain sufficient data to support that these drugs are Generally Recognized as Safe and Effective (GRASE). The FDA went on to conduct and publish a small clinical trail [2] to determine whether four of these drugs (avobenzone, oxybenzone, octocrylene, and ecamsule) absorb into the systemic circulation and whether they would exceed the FDA level for toxicological concern (0.5 ng/mL). The data collected demonstrated that all four sunscreen drugs absorbed through the skin and into the blood, and accumulated above the 0.5 ng/mL level within the first day (4 applications) of the study. Oxybenzone exceeded the level of concern after the first application demonstrating an overall maximum plasma concentration between 169.3 and 209.6 ng/mL for concentrations ranging from 4% to 6% in products, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么对防晒剂活性氧苯酮(二苯甲酮-3)的致癌性和生殖毒理学评价或认为其对人类使用不安全?
2019年2月26日,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)在联邦公报上发布了一份关于非处方人用防晒药物产品的更新[1],要求提供关于12种石油基防晒活性物质的额外信息(辛诺酸盐、二氧苯酮、乙磺唑、同盐酸盐、甲氧膦酸盐、辛氧膦酸盐、辛氧膦酸盐、辛氧膦酸盐、辛氧膦酸盐、辛氧膦酸盐、辛氧苯酮、辛氧苯酮)。这是因为公共记录目前没有足够的数据来支持这些药物被普遍认为是安全有效的(GRASE)。FDA继续进行并发表了一项小型临床试验[2],以确定其中四种药物(阿苯酮、氧苯酮、奥克瑞林和胶囊)是否被体循环吸收,以及它们是否会超过FDA的毒理学标准(0.5 ng/mL)。收集的数据表明,所有四种防晒药物通过皮肤吸收并进入血液,并在研究的第一天(4次应用)内积累超过0.5 ng/mL的水平。在第一次应用后,氧苯酮超出了关注水平,表明在产品浓度范围为4%至6%时,总体最大血浆浓度分别为169.3至209.6 ng/mL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Moderna Arm Cutaneous Side Effect of Moderna Vaccine among Healthcare Providers in Secondary Hospital in Jakarta - Tangerang, Indonesia. Mannitol Cream for Itchy Psoriasis, a Case Report The Effectiveness of Virgin Coconut Oil Application on Improving The Skin Integrity of Preterm Infants: Systematic Review and Metaanalysis with Neonatal Skin Condition Score as the Parameter Dyslipidemia in Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Sunscreens Percutaneous Absorption and Ingredients Concentration in Human Plasma and Urine: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1