Potential for recreational restrictions to reduce grizzly bear–caused human injuries

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q4 ZOOLOGY Ursus Pub Date : 2020-06-11 DOI:10.2192/URSUS-D-18-0005.1
K. Gunther, M. Haroldson
{"title":"Potential for recreational restrictions to reduce grizzly bear–caused human injuries","authors":"K. Gunther, M. Haroldson","doi":"10.2192/URSUS-D-18-0005.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In 2011, 2 hikers were killed by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in separate incidents on backcountry trails in Hayden Valley, Yellowstone National Park, USA (YNP). Hayden Valley provides prime habitat for grizzly bears and is known to have high densities of bears. During 1970–2017, 23% (10 of 44) of all backcountry grizzly bear–inflicted human injuries and fatalities in YNP occurred in the valley even though it comprises only 1% of the park. In addition, 3 of the last 5 fatal bear attacks in the park occurred in the valley. We evaluated retrospectively whether restrictions and closures on visitor recreational activity would have prevented many of these injuries. We considered prohibitions on recreational activity during seasons when bears forage for specific high-quality foods; potential closures that coincided with the times of day and year bears were most active in the valley; and visitor use restrictions that would have prevented the most common human behaviors associated with grizzly bear–caused human injuries. The food-based closure that may have prevented the most human injuries occurred during middle to late summer when bears scavenge bison (Bison bison) carcasses that result from annual rutting behavior of bison in the valley. However, safety precautions such as hiking in groups of ≥3, remaining on maintained trails, and carrying bear spray would likely reduce the frequency of bear-inflicted human injuries more than most food-based seasonal closures. Our analyses provide broadly applicable findings regarding use of visitor behavior restrictions and seasonal closures to reduce the risk of bear-inflicted human injuries.","PeriodicalId":49393,"journal":{"name":"Ursus","volume":"58 1","pages":"1 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ursus","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2192/URSUS-D-18-0005.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract: In 2011, 2 hikers were killed by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in separate incidents on backcountry trails in Hayden Valley, Yellowstone National Park, USA (YNP). Hayden Valley provides prime habitat for grizzly bears and is known to have high densities of bears. During 1970–2017, 23% (10 of 44) of all backcountry grizzly bear–inflicted human injuries and fatalities in YNP occurred in the valley even though it comprises only 1% of the park. In addition, 3 of the last 5 fatal bear attacks in the park occurred in the valley. We evaluated retrospectively whether restrictions and closures on visitor recreational activity would have prevented many of these injuries. We considered prohibitions on recreational activity during seasons when bears forage for specific high-quality foods; potential closures that coincided with the times of day and year bears were most active in the valley; and visitor use restrictions that would have prevented the most common human behaviors associated with grizzly bear–caused human injuries. The food-based closure that may have prevented the most human injuries occurred during middle to late summer when bears scavenge bison (Bison bison) carcasses that result from annual rutting behavior of bison in the valley. However, safety precautions such as hiking in groups of ≥3, remaining on maintained trails, and carrying bear spray would likely reduce the frequency of bear-inflicted human injuries more than most food-based seasonal closures. Our analyses provide broadly applicable findings regarding use of visitor behavior restrictions and seasonal closures to reduce the risk of bear-inflicted human injuries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
限制娱乐活动以减少灰熊造成的人类伤害的可能性
摘要:2011年,两名徒步旅行者在美国黄石国家公园(YNP)海登谷的野外小径上分别被灰熊(Ursus arctos)杀死。海登谷为灰熊提供了主要的栖息地,并且以熊的高密度而闻名。在1970年至2017年期间,在YNP所有由荒野灰熊造成的人身伤害和死亡中,有23%(44人中有10人)发生在山谷中,尽管山谷仅占公园的1%。此外,公园里最近5起致命的熊袭事件中有3起发生在山谷里。我们回顾性地评估了限制和关闭游客娱乐活动是否可以预防许多这些伤害。我们考虑在熊觅食特定高质量食物的季节禁止娱乐活动;可能关闭的时间正好是熊在山谷里最活跃的时候;游客使用限制可以防止与灰熊造成的人类伤害有关的最常见的人类行为。这种以食物为基础的封闭可能避免了大多数人的伤害发生在夏末,当熊在山谷中觅食野牛的尸体时,这是由于野牛每年的发情行为造成的。然而,与大多数基于食物的季节性关闭相比,安全预防措施,如3人以上的团体徒步旅行,保持在维护好的小径上,并携带防熊喷雾,可能会减少熊造成的人类伤害的频率。我们的分析提供了广泛适用的关于使用游客行为限制和季节性关闭的发现,以减少熊造成人类伤害的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ursus
Ursus 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ursus includes a variety of articles on all aspects of bear management and research worldwide. Original manuscripts are welcome. In addition to manuscripts reporting original research, submissions may be based on thoughtful review and synthesis of previously-reported information, innovative philosophies and opinions, and public policy or legal aspects of wildlife conservation. Notes of general interest are also welcome. Invited manuscripts will be clearly identified, but will still be subject to peer review. All manuscripts must be in English. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed, and subject to rigorous editorial standards.
期刊最新文献
Brown bear food habits in natural and human-modified landscapes in West-European Russia Escaping heat and anthropogenic pressures? Asiatic black bear denning behavior in its westernmost global range Interactions between brown bear cubs of different mothers in Kashmir, India Social network analysis uncovers hidden social complexity in giant pandas Survey on gastro-intestinal parasites of captive sun bears in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1