{"title":"Germany’s Strategic Reorientations, Present and Past","authors":"Stephen F. Szabo","doi":"10.1080/00396338.2023.2239054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Germany’s strategic reorientation under the Olaf Scholz-led coalition means the end of the civilian-power paradigm and the return of garrison states to European security following the shock of Russia’s war on Ukraine. Lessons can be drawn from the previous revolution in Germany’s strategic culture that took place in the 1950s under Konrad Adenauer and from the failures of adaptation in Germany’s security policies since reunification in 1990. Scholz leads a Germany facing a very different domestic and European political constellation than the one Adenauer faced. The role of economic actors and interests is much different in Germany’s relationship with Russia. Scholz also has a less predictable ally in a United States that is divided at home and faces a growing rival in China. Yet, as in Adenauer’s day, the perception of a direct threat and consequent urgency of alliance solidarity have helped diminish partisan differences and legacy biases.","PeriodicalId":51535,"journal":{"name":"Survival","volume":"124 1","pages":"31 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survival","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2023.2239054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Germany’s strategic reorientation under the Olaf Scholz-led coalition means the end of the civilian-power paradigm and the return of garrison states to European security following the shock of Russia’s war on Ukraine. Lessons can be drawn from the previous revolution in Germany’s strategic culture that took place in the 1950s under Konrad Adenauer and from the failures of adaptation in Germany’s security policies since reunification in 1990. Scholz leads a Germany facing a very different domestic and European political constellation than the one Adenauer faced. The role of economic actors and interests is much different in Germany’s relationship with Russia. Scholz also has a less predictable ally in a United States that is divided at home and faces a growing rival in China. Yet, as in Adenauer’s day, the perception of a direct threat and consequent urgency of alliance solidarity have helped diminish partisan differences and legacy biases.
期刊介绍:
Survival, the Institute"s bi-monthly journal, is a leading forum for analysis and debate of international and strategic affairs. With a diverse range of authors, thoughtful reviews and review essays, Survival is scholarly in depth while vivid, well-written and policy-relevant in approach. Shaped by its editors to be both timely and forward-thinking, the journal encourages writers to challenge conventional wisdom and bring fresh, often controversial, perspectives to bear on the strategic issues of the moment. Survival is essential reading for practitioners, analysts, teachers and followers of international affairs. Each issue also contains Book Reviews of the most important recent publications on international politics and security.