Endoscopic Therapy of Refractory Post-Papillotomy Bleeding With Electrocautery Forceps Coagulation Method Combined With Prophylactic Pancreatic Stenting

Zsolt Dubravcsik , István Hritz , Roland Fejes , Attila Szepes , László Madácsy
{"title":"Endoscopic Therapy of Refractory Post-Papillotomy Bleeding With Electrocautery Forceps Coagulation Method Combined With Prophylactic Pancreatic Stenting","authors":"Zsolt Dubravcsik ,&nbsp;István Hritz ,&nbsp;Roland Fejes ,&nbsp;Attila Szepes ,&nbsp;László Madácsy","doi":"10.1016/j.vjgien.2013.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The overall risk of clinically significant post-papillotomy bleeding is 1–4%, most of them manifest as a delayed hemorrhage 2–5 days after ERCP. Injection method with diluted epinephrine is the standard first line therapy of endoscopic hemostasis in these patients. In therapy resistant cases endoscopic hemocliping is effective, but optimal positioning of the hemoclips is difficult and sometimes impossible. Thermal coagulation method with coagulation forceps combined with prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting could be an alternative in these cases.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>We present 2 cases of recurrent post-papillotomy bleeding, both were detected in 1–6 days after the successful ERCP and EST. Standard endoscopic therapy with local injection of diluted epinephrine and/or application of hemoclips were ineffective. As a second line endoscopic therapy we used thermal coagulation of the bleeding vessels with coagulation forceps similarly to ESD. At the time of the thermal coagulation a 5F, 3–5 cm prophylactic pancreatic stent was applied to prevent pancreatitis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We achieved complete hemostasis in all patients without signs of further rebleeding or need for surgery. None of our patients developed post-procedure pancreatitis or perforation. Prophylactic pancreatic stents were safely removed after a few days.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We presented a new, effective and safe second line endoscopic hemostatic method in patients with therapy resistant post-papillotomy bleeding. Combination of prophylactic pancreatic stenting and thermal coagulation with coagulation forceps might be suggested as a rescue treatment in patients with severe post-papillotomy bleeding, resistant to standard endoscopic therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101274,"journal":{"name":"Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.vjgien.2013.06.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212097113000411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction

The overall risk of clinically significant post-papillotomy bleeding is 1–4%, most of them manifest as a delayed hemorrhage 2–5 days after ERCP. Injection method with diluted epinephrine is the standard first line therapy of endoscopic hemostasis in these patients. In therapy resistant cases endoscopic hemocliping is effective, but optimal positioning of the hemoclips is difficult and sometimes impossible. Thermal coagulation method with coagulation forceps combined with prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting could be an alternative in these cases.

Patients and methods

We present 2 cases of recurrent post-papillotomy bleeding, both were detected in 1–6 days after the successful ERCP and EST. Standard endoscopic therapy with local injection of diluted epinephrine and/or application of hemoclips were ineffective. As a second line endoscopic therapy we used thermal coagulation of the bleeding vessels with coagulation forceps similarly to ESD. At the time of the thermal coagulation a 5F, 3–5 cm prophylactic pancreatic stent was applied to prevent pancreatitis.

Results

We achieved complete hemostasis in all patients without signs of further rebleeding or need for surgery. None of our patients developed post-procedure pancreatitis or perforation. Prophylactic pancreatic stents were safely removed after a few days.

Conclusion

We presented a new, effective and safe second line endoscopic hemostatic method in patients with therapy resistant post-papillotomy bleeding. Combination of prophylactic pancreatic stenting and thermal coagulation with coagulation forceps might be suggested as a rescue treatment in patients with severe post-papillotomy bleeding, resistant to standard endoscopic therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜下电钳凝固法联合预防性胰腺支架植入术治疗乳头切开术后难治性出血
临床意义的乳头切开术后出血的总风险为1-4%,大多数表现为ERCP后2-5天的延迟出血。注射稀释肾上腺素是内镜止血的标准一线治疗方法。在治疗抵抗的情况下,内窥镜夹血是有效的,但最佳定位是困难的,有时是不可能的。热凝法加凝血钳联合预防性胰管支架置入术可作为此类病例的一种替代方法。患者和方法我们报告了2例乳头切除术后复发性出血,均在ERCP和EST成功后1-6天内发现,标准内镜下局部注射稀释肾上腺素和/或应用血夹治疗无效。作为第二线内镜治疗,我们使用与ESD类似的凝血钳对出血血管进行热凝。热凝5F时,应用3-5 cm预防性胰腺支架预防胰腺炎。结果所有患者均实现完全止血,无再出血迹象,无需手术治疗。所有患者均未出现术后胰腺炎或穿孔。几天后,预防性胰腺支架被安全移除。结论为治疗难治性乳头切开术后出血提供了一种新的、安全有效的内镜止血方法。对于乳头切除术后出血严重、标准内镜治疗无效的患者,建议预防性胰支架置入术联合热凝与凝血钳联合进行抢救治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Esophageal Granular Cell (Abrikossow) Tumor: Macroscopic Appearance and Endoscopic Management (Video) Ampullary Pyloric Gland Adenoma with High-grade Dysplasia (Video) Pancreatic Necrosectomy Through a Novel Double-flange Lumen-apposing Covered Metal Stent (Video) Gastrointestinal Sarcoidosis and Gastric Melanosis (Video) Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Duodenal Adenomas (Video)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1