Gaussian Pyramid Decomposition in Copy-Move Image Forgery Detection with SIFT and Zernike Moment Algorithms

Firstyani Imannisa Rahma, Ema Utami
{"title":"Gaussian Pyramid Decomposition in Copy-Move Image Forgery Detection with SIFT and Zernike Moment Algorithms","authors":"Firstyani Imannisa Rahma, Ema Utami","doi":"10.35671/telematika.v15i1.1322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the easiest manipulation methods is a copy-move forgery, which adds or hides objects in the images with copies of certain parts at the same pictures. The combination of SIFT and Zernike Moments is one of many methods that helping to detect textured and smooth regions. However, this combination is slowest than SIFT individually. On the other hand, Gaussian Pyramid Decomposition helps to reduce computation time. Because of this finding, we examine the impact of Gaussian Pyramid Decomposition in copy-move detection with SIFT and Zernike Moments combinations. We conducted detection test in plain copy-move, copy-move with rotation transformation, copy-move with JPEG compression, multiple copy-move, copy-move with reflection attack, and copy-move with image inpainting. We also examine the detections result with different values of gaussian pyramid limit and different area separation ratios. In detection with plain copy-move images, it generates low level of accuracy, precision and recall of 58.46%, 18.21% and 69.39%, respectively. The results are getting worse in for copy-move detection with reflection attack and copy-move with image inpainting. This weakness happened because this method has not been able to detect the position of the part of the image that is considered symmetrical and check whether the forged part uses samples from other parts of the image.","PeriodicalId":31716,"journal":{"name":"Telematika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35671/telematika.v15i1.1322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the easiest manipulation methods is a copy-move forgery, which adds or hides objects in the images with copies of certain parts at the same pictures. The combination of SIFT and Zernike Moments is one of many methods that helping to detect textured and smooth regions. However, this combination is slowest than SIFT individually. On the other hand, Gaussian Pyramid Decomposition helps to reduce computation time. Because of this finding, we examine the impact of Gaussian Pyramid Decomposition in copy-move detection with SIFT and Zernike Moments combinations. We conducted detection test in plain copy-move, copy-move with rotation transformation, copy-move with JPEG compression, multiple copy-move, copy-move with reflection attack, and copy-move with image inpainting. We also examine the detections result with different values of gaussian pyramid limit and different area separation ratios. In detection with plain copy-move images, it generates low level of accuracy, precision and recall of 58.46%, 18.21% and 69.39%, respectively. The results are getting worse in for copy-move detection with reflection attack and copy-move with image inpainting. This weakness happened because this method has not been able to detect the position of the part of the image that is considered symmetrical and check whether the forged part uses samples from other parts of the image.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高斯金字塔分解在SIFT和Zernike矩复制-移动图像伪造检测中的应用
最简单的操作方法之一是复制-移动伪造,即在图像中添加或隐藏对象,复制同一图像的某些部分。SIFT和泽尼克时刻的结合是帮助检测纹理和光滑区域的许多方法之一。但是,这种组合比单独使用SIFT慢。另一方面,高斯金字塔分解有助于减少计算时间。由于这一发现,我们研究了高斯金字塔分解在SIFT和Zernike矩组合的复制-移动检测中的影响。我们进行了纯复制-移动、旋转变换复制-移动、JPEG压缩复制-移动、多次复制-移动、反射攻击复制-移动、图像绘制复制-移动等检测测试。我们还考察了不同高斯金字塔极限值和不同面积分离比下的检测结果。在普通复制移动图像的检测中,准确率、精密度和召回率较低,分别为58.46%、18.21%和69.39%。采用反射攻击的复制-移动检测和采用图像绘制的复制-移动检测结果越来越差。这一弱点的出现是因为这种方法无法检测到图像中被认为是对称的部分的位置,也无法检查锻造部分是否使用了图像中其他部分的样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Identification of Social Media Posts Containing Self-reported COVID-19 Symptoms using Triple Word Embeddings and Long Short-Term Memory Deep Learning for Histopathological Image Analysis: A Convolutional Neural Network Approach to Colon Cancer Classification Comparative Analysis of Classification Methods in Sentiment Analysis: The Impact of Feature Selection and Ensemble Techniques Optimization Optimizing Clustering of Indonesian Text Data Using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm: A Case Study of the Quran Translation Monitoring Development Board based on InfluxDB and Grafana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1