Benefits of Static Stretching, Pliates ® and Elastic Bands Resistance Training on Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Longitudinal Study
M. Ponzano, L. Beratto, C. Mazzà, S. Ditommaso, F. AbateDaga, R. Allois, M. Gollin
{"title":"Benefits of Static Stretching, Pliates ® and Elastic Bands Resistance Training on Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Longitudinal Study","authors":"M. Ponzano, L. Beratto, C. Mazzà, S. Ditommaso, F. AbateDaga, R. Allois, M. Gollin","doi":"10.4172/2155-9562.1000438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the effects of Pilates®, a 30 s static stretching protocol and elastic bands resistance training on lower and hand-grip strength, rachis morphology, flexibility and body balance among RRMS patients. Methods: Twenty-two subjects affected by relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS, EDSS ≤ 6) were randomly divided into 3 groups whose members each performed 16 weeks of training. Stabilometry, rachis morphology, sit and reach, handgrip and sit to stand tests were performed three times: T0, after a month of learning training protocols; T1, after eight weeks of training; and T2, after sixteen weeks of training. Results: Static stretching group. Spinal Mouse (inclination line between ThSp1 and S1 from a standing position): T0 vs. T2, -55%; Sit and Reach test: T0 vs. T2, +15%. Pilates group. Sit and Reach test: T0 vs. T2, +15%; Sit to Stand test: T0 vs. T2, +31%. Elastic group. Stabilometry with eyes open: T0 vs. T1, -51%; stabilometry with eyes closed: T0 vs. T1, -52%; sit to stand test: T0 vs. T2, +39%. Conclusion: Static stretching, Pilates and resistance training are useful to increase the autonomy in the daily life of people with MS thanks to the adoption of these three different training methods.","PeriodicalId":16455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology and Neurophysiology","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology and Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9562.1000438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effects of Pilates®, a 30 s static stretching protocol and elastic bands resistance training on lower and hand-grip strength, rachis morphology, flexibility and body balance among RRMS patients. Methods: Twenty-two subjects affected by relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS, EDSS ≤ 6) were randomly divided into 3 groups whose members each performed 16 weeks of training. Stabilometry, rachis morphology, sit and reach, handgrip and sit to stand tests were performed three times: T0, after a month of learning training protocols; T1, after eight weeks of training; and T2, after sixteen weeks of training. Results: Static stretching group. Spinal Mouse (inclination line between ThSp1 and S1 from a standing position): T0 vs. T2, -55%; Sit and Reach test: T0 vs. T2, +15%. Pilates group. Sit and Reach test: T0 vs. T2, +15%; Sit to Stand test: T0 vs. T2, +31%. Elastic group. Stabilometry with eyes open: T0 vs. T1, -51%; stabilometry with eyes closed: T0 vs. T1, -52%; sit to stand test: T0 vs. T2, +39%. Conclusion: Static stretching, Pilates and resistance training are useful to increase the autonomy in the daily life of people with MS thanks to the adoption of these three different training methods.
目的:比较普拉提®、30 s静态拉伸方案和弹性带阻力训练对RRMS患者下肢和手部力量、脊柱形态、柔韧性和身体平衡的影响。方法:22例复发-缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS, EDSS≤6)患者随机分为3组,每组进行16周的训练。在学习训练方案一个月后,进行了三次稳定性测量、脊柱形态、坐与伸、握力和坐与站测试;T1,经过8周的训练;T2,经过16周的训练。结果:静态拉伸组。脊髓小鼠(从站立位置ThSp1和S1之间的倾斜线):T0 vs. T2, -55%;坐举测试:T0 vs. T2, +15%。普拉提。坐伸测试:T0 vs. T2, +15%;坐立比测试:T0 vs. T2, +31%。弹性组。睁眼稳定性:T0 vs. T1, -51%;闭眼稳定性:T0 vs. T1, -52%;静坐测试:T0 vs. T2, +39%。结论:静态拉伸、普拉提和阻力训练三种不同的训练方法均有助于增强MS患者日常生活中的自主性。