Post/Method: Are They Compensating or Competing?

Görsev Sönmez Boran, Serkan Gürkan
{"title":"Post/Method: Are They Compensating or Competing?","authors":"Görsev Sönmez Boran, Serkan Gürkan","doi":"10.17263/jlls.648550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims to investigate the perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding the conventional methods and post-method pedagogy in Turkey. The participants of the study consist of 107 pre-service teachers from 14 different universities and 53 in-service teachers from different cities all over Turkey. An online questionnaire (Tigli, 2014) was used for data collection and fast evaluation in this study. The data derived from the questionnaire was analyzed to reveal the frequencies, means, and standard deviations. The results of the study yielded that Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Total Physical Response (TPR) are the two most highly favored teaching methods among pre-service and in-service language teachers. Even though they are supporting the idea of using language teaching methods in the classroom, they consider that there is not only single and best method. They agreed that methods can alter depending on the local needs, and teachers can mix a number of methods for a better teaching. With these results, they appear to support the fundamental idea of post-method pedagogy; autonomy of the teacher.","PeriodicalId":55744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ELT Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ELT Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.648550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding the conventional methods and post-method pedagogy in Turkey. The participants of the study consist of 107 pre-service teachers from 14 different universities and 53 in-service teachers from different cities all over Turkey. An online questionnaire (Tigli, 2014) was used for data collection and fast evaluation in this study. The data derived from the questionnaire was analyzed to reveal the frequencies, means, and standard deviations. The results of the study yielded that Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Total Physical Response (TPR) are the two most highly favored teaching methods among pre-service and in-service language teachers. Even though they are supporting the idea of using language teaching methods in the classroom, they consider that there is not only single and best method. They agreed that methods can alter depending on the local needs, and teachers can mix a number of methods for a better teaching. With these results, they appear to support the fundamental idea of post-method pedagogy; autonomy of the teacher.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职位/方法:它们是补偿还是竞争?
本研究旨在调查职前和在职教师对土耳其传统方法和后方法教学法的看法。该研究的参与者包括来自土耳其14所不同大学的107名职前教师和来自土耳其不同城市的53名在职教师。本研究采用在线问卷(Tigli, 2014)进行数据收集和快速评估。对问卷数据进行分析,揭示频率、均值和标准差。研究结果表明,交际教学法和全身反应教学法是职前和在职语言教师最青睐的两种教学方法。尽管他们支持在课堂上使用语言教学方法的想法,但他们认为并不是只有一种最好的方法。他们一致认为,方法可以根据当地的需要而改变,教师可以混合使用多种方法来提高教学效果。有了这些结果,他们似乎支持后方法教学法的基本理念;教师的自主性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Post/Method: Are They Compensating or Competing? Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis and Second Language Learning The Contribution of Facebook Group in Writing Activity The Use of Social Media in Designing The Writing Assessment for EFL Students Malaysian Undergraduates’ Behavioural Intention to Use LMS: An Extended Self-Directed Learning Technology Acceptance Model (SDLTAM)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1