首页 > 最新文献

Journal of ELT Research最新文献

英文 中文
Post/Method: Are They Compensating or Competing? 职位/方法:它们是补偿还是竞争?
Pub Date : 2019-12-30 DOI: 10.17263/jlls.648550
Görsev Sönmez Boran, Serkan Gürkan
The present study aims to investigate the perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding the conventional methods and post-method pedagogy in Turkey. The participants of the study consist of 107 pre-service teachers from 14 different universities and 53 in-service teachers from different cities all over Turkey. An online questionnaire (Tigli, 2014) was used for data collection and fast evaluation in this study. The data derived from the questionnaire was analyzed to reveal the frequencies, means, and standard deviations. The results of the study yielded that Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Total Physical Response (TPR) are the two most highly favored teaching methods among pre-service and in-service language teachers. Even though they are supporting the idea of using language teaching methods in the classroom, they consider that there is not only single and best method. They agreed that methods can alter depending on the local needs, and teachers can mix a number of methods for a better teaching. With these results, they appear to support the fundamental idea of post-method pedagogy; autonomy of the teacher.
本研究旨在调查职前和在职教师对土耳其传统方法和后方法教学法的看法。该研究的参与者包括来自土耳其14所不同大学的107名职前教师和来自土耳其不同城市的53名在职教师。本研究采用在线问卷(Tigli, 2014)进行数据收集和快速评估。对问卷数据进行分析,揭示频率、均值和标准差。研究结果表明,交际教学法和全身反应教学法是职前和在职语言教师最青睐的两种教学方法。尽管他们支持在课堂上使用语言教学方法的想法,但他们认为并不是只有一种最好的方法。他们一致认为,方法可以根据当地的需要而改变,教师可以混合使用多种方法来提高教学效果。有了这些结果,他们似乎支持后方法教学法的基本理念;教师的自主性。
{"title":"Post/Method: Are They Compensating or Competing?","authors":"Görsev Sönmez Boran, Serkan Gürkan","doi":"10.17263/jlls.648550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.648550","url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims to investigate the perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding the conventional methods and post-method pedagogy in Turkey. The participants of the study consist of 107 pre-service teachers from 14 different universities and 53 in-service teachers from different cities all over Turkey. An online questionnaire (Tigli, 2014) was used for data collection and fast evaluation in this study. The data derived from the questionnaire was analyzed to reveal the frequencies, means, and standard deviations. The results of the study yielded that Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Total Physical Response (TPR) are the two most highly favored teaching methods among pre-service and in-service language teachers. Even though they are supporting the idea of using language teaching methods in the classroom, they consider that there is not only single and best method. They agreed that methods can alter depending on the local needs, and teachers can mix a number of methods for a better teaching. With these results, they appear to support the fundamental idea of post-method pedagogy; autonomy of the teacher.","PeriodicalId":55744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ELT Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76407542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis and Second Language Learning 对比分析假说与第二语言学习
Pub Date : 2019-02-27 DOI: 10.22236/jer_vol4issue1pp35-43
Ali Akbar Khansir, Farhad Pakdel
This article aims to provide an overview of some of the issues related to contrastive analysis hypothesis in second language learning. Contrastive hypothesis is one of the branches of applied linguistics which concerns with the study of two systems of languages between first language and target language. Contrastive hypothesis has fairly played an important role in language studies. Thus, in recent years, contrastive analysis has been used in language teaching contexts, syllabus design, and language classrooms by language teachers over the world. Many research works have been done by many language researchers in different aspects of contrastive hypothesis and also error analysis in the world. Language teachers always see contrastive analysis as a pedagogical imperative in target language and they use it as a functional approach in language classroom. However, contrastive hypothesis follows the errors of language learners in second language education.
本文旨在概述第二语言学习中与对比分析假说相关的一些问题。对比假说是应用语言学的一个分支,主要研究母语和目的语之间的两种语言体系。对比假说在语言研究中起着相当重要的作用。因此,近年来,对比分析已被世界各地的语言教师应用于语言教学语境、教学大纲设计和语言课堂。国际上许多语言研究者在对比假设和误差分析的不同方面做了大量的研究工作。语言教师一直将对比分析视为目的语教学的必要手段,并将其作为一种功能分析方法应用于语言课堂。然而,在第二语言教育中,对比假设却伴随着语言学习者的错误。
{"title":"Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis and Second Language Learning","authors":"Ali Akbar Khansir, Farhad Pakdel","doi":"10.22236/jer_vol4issue1pp35-43","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22236/jer_vol4issue1pp35-43","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to provide an overview of some of the issues related to contrastive analysis hypothesis in second language learning. Contrastive hypothesis is one of the branches of applied linguistics which concerns with the study of two systems of languages between first language and target language. Contrastive hypothesis has fairly played an important role in language studies. Thus, in recent years, contrastive analysis has been used in language teaching contexts, syllabus design, and language classrooms by language teachers over the world. Many research works have been done by many language researchers in different aspects of contrastive hypothesis and also error analysis in the world. Language teachers always see contrastive analysis as a pedagogical imperative in target language and they use it as a functional approach in language classroom. However, contrastive hypothesis follows the errors of language learners in second language education.","PeriodicalId":55744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ELT Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44278117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
The Use of Social Media in Designing The Writing Assessment for EFL Students 社交媒体在英语写作评估设计中的应用
Pub Date : 2019-02-27 DOI: 10.22236/jer_vol4issue1pp26-34
Rita Suswati, Syarbaini Saleh
This research investigates social media as the assessment for EFL students at State University of Medan (UNIMED) of second semester English educational program. This research focuses on how social media influences the students’ competences in writing skills. The problems are how it influences their ability to develop their ideas in writing; develop the reading & writing materials; change the students’ opinion on social media in writing class. Questionnaire was designed to get the students’ thought on social media matter, their intention of social media for study, particularly in reading and writing topic and the influence of social media on their ability in developing the idea in writing class. The instruments used in this research were social media as Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram as a text in reading & writing class. The population consisted of 80 students from two classes of English educational program. Data was analyzed using Research & Development Method (R&D) and the Linkert Scale to get the percentage of students’ perception. The findings of this paper indicate that students more enjoy and engage in writing class using social media as their assessments; using social media to develop ideas on a topic; and being more creative in writing skills. However, control and development are still needed on this topic.
本研究调查了社交媒体作为对棉兰州立大学(UNIMED)EFL学生第二学期英语教育项目的评估。本研究的重点是社交媒体如何影响学生的写作能力。问题是它如何影响他们在写作中发展思想的能力;开发读写材料;在写作课上改变学生对社交媒体的看法。问卷旨在了解学生对社交媒体问题的思考,他们对社交媒体的学习意图,特别是在阅读和写作主题方面,以及社交媒体对他们在写作课堂上发展思想能力的影响。这项研究中使用的工具是社交媒体,如Facebook、WhatsApp和Instagram,作为阅读和写作课上的文本。研究对象包括80名来自两个英语教育班的学生。使用研究与发展方法(R&D)和Linkert量表对数据进行分析,以获得学生感知的百分比。本文的研究结果表明,学生更喜欢并参与使用社交媒体作为评估的写作课堂;利用社交媒体发展对某一主题的想法;以及在写作技巧上更具创造性。然而,在这个问题上仍然需要控制和发展。
{"title":"The Use of Social Media in Designing The Writing Assessment for EFL Students","authors":"Rita Suswati, Syarbaini Saleh","doi":"10.22236/jer_vol4issue1pp26-34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22236/jer_vol4issue1pp26-34","url":null,"abstract":"This research investigates social media as the assessment for EFL students at State University of Medan (UNIMED) of second semester English educational program. This research focuses on how social media influences the students’ competences in writing skills. The problems are how it influences their ability to develop their ideas in writing; develop the reading & writing materials; change the students’ opinion on social media in writing class. Questionnaire was designed to get the students’ thought on social media matter, their intention of social media for study, particularly in reading and writing topic and the influence of social media on their ability in developing the idea in writing class. The instruments used in this research were social media as Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram as a text in reading & writing class. The population consisted of 80 students from two classes of English educational program. Data was analyzed using Research & Development Method (R&D) and the Linkert Scale to get the percentage of students’ perception. The findings of this paper indicate that students more enjoy and engage in writing class using social media as their assessments; using social media to develop ideas on a topic; and being more creative in writing skills. However, control and development are still needed on this topic.","PeriodicalId":55744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ELT Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49643964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
The Contribution of Facebook Group in Writing Activity Facebook群在写作活动中的贡献
Pub Date : 2019-02-27 DOI: 10.22236/JER_VOL4ISSUE1PP44-51
M. Andini
This study investigated the contribution of Facebook Group (FG) in writing activity and the students’ perception of using FG in writing activity. It is qualitative research - case study. It used purposive sampling technique involving three students at eleventh grade of Senior High School. Interview with open-ended was distributed as the technique of collecting data to allow the participants to explore their ideas. Thus, the data was analyzed by content analysis in which the data passed the process of data reduction, data display and conclusion and verification. The finding revealed that Facebook group just has contribution in pre-writing activity while the others’ activities were done in the classroom. Then, through the interview, the students’ stated that they felt comfortable in expressing their ideas through Facebook group, thus, they also felt motivated when their friends’ gave their comments on their statements.     
本研究调查了Facebook群组(FG)在写作活动中的贡献以及学生在写作活动使用FG的感知。它是定性研究-案例研究。采用有针对性的抽样方法,对三名高三学生进行了调查。开放式访谈是一种收集数据的技术,让参与者探索自己的想法。因此,通过内容分析对数据进行了分析,其中数据经过了数据还原、数据显示、结论和验证的过程。研究结果显示,Facebook小组只在写作前活动中有贡献,而其他小组的活动都是在课堂上进行的。然后,通过采访,学生们表示,他们在通过Facebook群组表达自己的想法时感到很舒服,因此,当他们的朋友对他们的陈述发表评论时,他们也感到有动力。
{"title":"The Contribution of Facebook Group in Writing Activity","authors":"M. Andini","doi":"10.22236/JER_VOL4ISSUE1PP44-51","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22236/JER_VOL4ISSUE1PP44-51","url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the contribution of Facebook Group (FG) in writing activity and the students’ perception of using FG in writing activity. It is qualitative research - case study. It used purposive sampling technique involving three students at eleventh grade of Senior High School. Interview with open-ended was distributed as the technique of collecting data to allow the participants to explore their ideas. Thus, the data was analyzed by content analysis in which the data passed the process of data reduction, data display and conclusion and verification. The finding revealed that Facebook group just has contribution in pre-writing activity while the others’ activities were done in the classroom. Then, through the interview, the students’ stated that they felt comfortable in expressing their ideas through Facebook group, thus, they also felt motivated when their friends’ gave their comments on their statements.     ","PeriodicalId":55744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ELT Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47021830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Rhetorical Reading for Writing Strategies 修辞阅读的写作策略
Pub Date : 2019-01-30 DOI: 10.22236/JER_VOL4ISSUE1PP1-7
Irena Kuzborska
This article is based on the plenary talk given at the inaugural UHAMKA International Conference on English Language Teaching (ELT) and Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) (UICELL 2018) in Jakarta, Indonesia, 23 November 2018, and focuses on the explanation of reading as a communicative rhetorical act. Outlining the key features of such reading, it then considers the benefits of reading texts rhetorically. A specific focus is given to the role of rhetorical reading in writing. While the article acknowledges the limited research on the relationship, it provides some evidence that reading texts rhetorical can lead to both more effective reading and more effective writing. A specific technique on how to teach students to read texts rhetorically is also presented in this article.
本文基于2018年11月23日在印度尼西亚雅加达举行的首届UHAMKA英语教学和计算机辅助语言学习国际会议(UICELL 2018)上的全体演讲,重点阐述了阅读作为一种交际修辞行为的解释。概述了这种阅读的主要特点,然后从修辞角度考虑了阅读文本的好处。重点讨论了修辞阅读在写作中的作用。虽然本文承认对这一关系的研究有限,但它提供了一些证据,证明阅读修辞文本可以带来更有效的阅读和更有效的写作。本文还介绍了一种具体的技巧,教学生如何从修辞角度阅读课文。
{"title":"Rhetorical Reading for Writing Strategies","authors":"Irena Kuzborska","doi":"10.22236/JER_VOL4ISSUE1PP1-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22236/JER_VOL4ISSUE1PP1-7","url":null,"abstract":"This article is based on the plenary talk given at the inaugural UHAMKA International Conference on English Language Teaching (ELT) and Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) (UICELL 2018) in Jakarta, Indonesia, 23 November 2018, and focuses on the explanation of reading as a communicative rhetorical act. Outlining the key features of such reading, it then considers the benefits of reading texts rhetorically. A specific focus is given to the role of rhetorical reading in writing. While the article acknowledges the limited research on the relationship, it provides some evidence that reading texts rhetorical can lead to both more effective reading and more effective writing. A specific technique on how to teach students to read texts rhetorically is also presented in this article.","PeriodicalId":55744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ELT Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49264437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Malaysian Undergraduates’ Behavioural Intention to Use LMS: An Extended Self-Directed Learning Technology Acceptance Model (SDLTAM) 马来西亚大学生使用LMS的行为意向:一个扩展的自主学习技术接受模型(SDLTAM)
Pub Date : 2019-01-30 DOI: 10.22236/JER_VOL4ISSUE1PP8-25
Christine Ong
The usage of Learning Management System (LMS) conducted in Blended Learning style is believed to increase students’ academic performance and their self-directed learning. Nonetheless, the success of students’ behavioural intention to use these e-learning platforms still remains unclear due to factors like self-directed learning, computer self-efficacy, satisfaction and perceived enjoyment and ESL. This preliminary study aims to incorporate factors that impact students’ self-directed learning of English language in achieving behavioural intention to use LMS with an extended model namely, SDLTAM, generalised for the Malaysian educational institutions. The original Technology Acceptance Model 1 by Davis (1989) was used as a theoretical framework of this study. However, the last variable Actual Use was excluded in this study. A sample of 338 respondents from both private and public universities in Malaysia took part in the 48-items survey. The data were analysed through Structural Equation Modelling through SPSS AMOS 24. The SEM AMOS revealed that the factors were found to moderately fit into the proposed model. This could be misspecification within the model and some items within a factor were more correlated to each other than others.
在混合学习风格中使用学习管理系统(LMS)被认为可以提高学生的学习成绩和自主学习。尽管如此,由于自主学习、计算机自我效能感、满意度和感知乐趣以及ESL等因素,学生使用这些电子学习平台的行为意向是否成功仍不清楚。本初步研究旨在将影响学生自主学习英语的因素纳入使用LMS的行为意向中,并采用一种扩展模型,即SDLTAM,该模型适用于马来西亚教育机构。Davis(1989)的原始技术接受模型1被用作本研究的理论框架。然而,本研究中排除了最后一个变量实际使用。来自马来西亚私立和公立大学的338名受访者参加了48项调查。数据通过SPSS AMOS 24结构方程建模进行分析。SEM AMOS显示,发现这些因素适度符合所提出的模型。这可能是模型中的错误指定,并且一个因素中的某些项目彼此之间的相关性比其他项目更大。
{"title":"Malaysian Undergraduates’ Behavioural Intention to Use LMS: An Extended Self-Directed Learning Technology Acceptance Model (SDLTAM)","authors":"Christine Ong","doi":"10.22236/JER_VOL4ISSUE1PP8-25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22236/JER_VOL4ISSUE1PP8-25","url":null,"abstract":"The usage of Learning Management System (LMS) conducted in Blended Learning style is believed to increase students’ academic performance and their self-directed learning. Nonetheless, the success of students’ behavioural intention to use these e-learning platforms still remains unclear due to factors like self-directed learning, computer self-efficacy, satisfaction and perceived enjoyment and ESL. This preliminary study aims to incorporate factors that impact students’ self-directed learning of English language in achieving behavioural intention to use LMS with an extended model namely, SDLTAM, generalised for the Malaysian educational institutions. The original Technology Acceptance Model 1 by Davis (1989) was used as a theoretical framework of this study. However, the last variable Actual Use was excluded in this study. A sample of 338 respondents from both private and public universities in Malaysia took part in the 48-items survey. The data were analysed through Structural Equation Modelling through SPSS AMOS 24. The SEM AMOS revealed that the factors were found to moderately fit into the proposed model. This could be misspecification within the model and some items within a factor were more correlated to each other than others.","PeriodicalId":55744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ELT Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43752558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Metacognitive awareness of strategy use in EFL reading comprehension in Bangladesh 孟加拉语阅读理解中策略使用的元认知意识
Pub Date : 2018-09-10 DOI: 10.22236/jer_vol3issue2pp204-221
Tasnima Aktar, I. Ahmed
It is argued that learners’ metacognitive awareness of strategy use is significantly associated with their achievement in reading comprehension. In order to ascertain this association, the present researcher carries out the investigation to substantiate the existing findings. This current study is a partial replication of Carrell (1989) and Vogely (1995) with regard to their methods and objectives. The objectives of this research are to explore the higher secondary-level EFL learners’ perceptions of themselves as readers, of their use of comprehension and repair strategies, of difficulties as well as the effectiveness of reading strategies, and its relationship with their reading comprehension, if any. For this investigation, quantitative data collected from 148 higher secondary-level EFL learners via a modified Metacognitive Awareness Strategy Questionnaire (MASQ; Carrell, 1989) and a reading comprehension test were analyzed through statistical tools available in SPSS. The results reveal that learners possess a moderate awareness of reading strategies, and their perceptions of effective strategies and of the difficulty of strategy use are significantly and positively related to their reading comprehension. Based on the findings, pedagogical implications are discussed and scope for future studies is recommended.
研究表明,学习者对策略使用的元认知意识与他们的阅读理解成绩显著相关。为了确定这种联系,本研究人员进行了调查,以证实现有的发现。本研究部分复制了Carrell(1989)和Vogely(1995)的方法和目标。本研究的目的是探讨高中英语学习者对自己作为读者的看法,对理解和修复策略的使用,对阅读策略的困难和有效性的看法,以及阅读策略与阅读理解的关系。在这项调查中,通过修改的元认知意识策略问卷(MASQ;Carrell,1989)和阅读理解测试从148名高中英语学习者中收集的定量数据通过SPSS中的统计工具进行了分析。研究结果表明,学习者对阅读策略具有适度的认知,他们对有效策略和策略使用难度的认知与他们的阅读理解显著正相关。根据研究结果,讨论了教学意义,并建议了未来的研究范围。
{"title":"Metacognitive awareness of strategy use in EFL reading comprehension in Bangladesh","authors":"Tasnima Aktar, I. Ahmed","doi":"10.22236/jer_vol3issue2pp204-221","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22236/jer_vol3issue2pp204-221","url":null,"abstract":"It is argued that learners’ metacognitive awareness of strategy use is significantly associated with their achievement in reading comprehension. In order to ascertain this association, the present researcher carries out the investigation to substantiate the existing findings. This current study is a partial replication of Carrell (1989) and Vogely (1995) with regard to their methods and objectives. The objectives of this research are to explore the higher secondary-level EFL learners’ perceptions of themselves as readers, of their use of comprehension and repair strategies, of difficulties as well as the effectiveness of reading strategies, and its relationship with their reading comprehension, if any. For this investigation, quantitative data collected from 148 higher secondary-level EFL learners via a modified Metacognitive Awareness Strategy Questionnaire (MASQ; Carrell, 1989) and a reading comprehension test were analyzed through statistical tools available in SPSS. The results reveal that learners possess a moderate awareness of reading strategies, and their perceptions of effective strategies and of the difficulty of strategy use are significantly and positively related to their reading comprehension. Based on the findings, pedagogical implications are discussed and scope for future studies is recommended.","PeriodicalId":55744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ELT Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44288088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Raters’ Decision Making Variations in Scoring Writing Samples 评分者在写作样本评分中的决策变化
Pub Date : 2018-09-10 DOI: 10.22236/JER_VOL3ISSUE2PP142-151
Asma Dabiri
This study examined raters’ decision making variations in a writing assessment task focusing on individual differences in decision-making style (DMS). The participants’ of the study were six TEFL instructors. A rating scale obtained from Turner and Upshur, 2002 and a General Decision Making Style Inventory questionnaire, GDMSI, obtained from Scott and Bruce (1995) were administered to raters. The results showed the raters’ behaviors were not equally the same in the same rating situations. These discrepancies suggested individual socio-cognitive differences in accounting for some rater variability in scoring. In addition, characteristics of the texts (not just individual cognitive characteristics) favored certain decision-making behaviors. Accordingly, a re-visioning of the one-size-fits-all approach that is currently the norm in the training of raters for scoring writing assessments is needed. Further, a more individualized approach to rater training is needed. If the individual decision-making style to a great extent is dependent on basic cognitive abilities that are stable and not easily changed, then the decision support systems need to be flexible in order to match the needs of the individual decision makers.
本研究考察了评分者在写作评估任务中的决策差异,重点关注决策风格(DMS)的个体差异。该研究的参与者是六位TEFL教师。对评分者使用Turner and Upshur(2002)的评分量表和Scott and Bruce(1995)的一般决策风格问卷(GDMSI)。结果表明,在相同的评分情境下,评分者的行为并不完全相同。这些差异表明个体的社会认知差异在解释评分的一些变异性。此外,文本的特征(不仅仅是个体认知特征)有利于某些决策行为。因此,有必要重新考虑目前在培训写作评分员时采用的一刀切的方法。此外,还需要一种更加个性化的训练方法。如果个体的决策风格在很大程度上依赖于稳定且不易改变的基本认知能力,那么决策支持系统就需要具有灵活性,以适应个体决策者的需求。
{"title":"Raters’ Decision Making Variations in Scoring Writing Samples","authors":"Asma Dabiri","doi":"10.22236/JER_VOL3ISSUE2PP142-151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22236/JER_VOL3ISSUE2PP142-151","url":null,"abstract":"This study examined raters’ decision making variations in a writing assessment task focusing on individual differences in decision-making style (DMS). The participants’ of the study were six TEFL instructors. A rating scale obtained from Turner and Upshur, 2002 and a General Decision Making Style Inventory questionnaire, GDMSI, obtained from Scott and Bruce (1995) were administered to raters. The results showed the raters’ behaviors were not equally the same in the same rating situations. These discrepancies suggested individual socio-cognitive differences in accounting for some rater variability in scoring. In addition, characteristics of the texts (not just individual cognitive characteristics) favored certain decision-making behaviors. Accordingly, a re-visioning of the one-size-fits-all approach that is currently the norm in the training of raters for scoring writing assessments is needed. Further, a more individualized approach to rater training is needed. If the individual decision-making style to a great extent is dependent on basic cognitive abilities that are stable and not easily changed, then the decision support systems need to be flexible in order to match the needs of the individual decision makers.","PeriodicalId":55744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ELT Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45106957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
EFL Learners’ Speaking Anxiety in an EOP Program EOP项目中英语学习者的口语焦虑
Pub Date : 2018-07-23 DOI: 10.22236/JER_VOL3ISSUE2PP193-203
R. Irawan
This research aimed at describing students’ speaking anxiety in EFL classroom at occupation level. It investigated EOP students’ speaking anxiety levels, their sources of anxiety and their coping strategies to reduce it. This research involved eight students from two classes with different English abilities and employed a qualitative research design, embracing the characteristics of a case study conducted in PT Rekacipta Miratama Bekasi from December 2016 to March 2017. Three kinds of instruments were applied for this research: classroom observation, questionnaires (adapted from Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale by Horwitz), and semi-structured interview. The data were collected by means audio and video recording to capture students’ sources of anxiety and their coping strategies and collaborated with a semi-structured interview. Those data were transcribed and coded by using the categorization from Alwasilahs’ coding strategy (2002) and obtained by quantifying questionnaires in order to know the students’ anxiety levels. The first finding reveals that the students who categorized as an anxious and a mildly anxious level had the highest percentage (each of them was 37%), while those who categorized as a relaxed and a very relaxed level had the lower of percentage (each of them was 17%). Secondly, the research participants who categorized as an anxious and a mildly anxious level stated that all FLA sources that are a communication apprehension, a test anxiety, and a fear of negative evaluation had similar percentages (each of them 33.34%). Lastly, coping strategies that all anxious students used in this research were anticipation that belonged to compromise behaviors.    Keywords: Speaking Anxiety, Anxiety Levels, Anxiety Sources, Coping Strategies to Reduce FLA, EOP Students
本研究旨在从职业层面描述学生在英语课堂上的口语焦虑。本研究调查了英语专业学生的口语焦虑水平、焦虑的来源以及缓解焦虑的应对策略。本研究采用了2016年12月至2017年3月在Rekacipta Miratama Bekasi PT进行的案例研究的特点,采用了定性研究设计,涉及来自两个不同英语能力班级的8名学生。本研究采用三种工具:课堂观察、问卷调查(改编自Horwitz的《外语课堂焦虑量表》)和半结构化访谈。数据收集采用音频和视频记录的方式来捕捉学生的焦虑来源和他们的应对策略,并配合半结构化访谈。这些数据采用Alwasilahs '编码策略(2002)的分类进行转录和编码,并通过量化问卷获得,以了解学生的焦虑水平。第一个发现表明,被归类为焦虑和轻度焦虑水平的学生所占比例最高(各为37%),而被归类为放松和非常放松水平的学生所占比例较低(各为17%)。其次,被归类为焦虑和轻度焦虑水平的研究参与者表示,所有FLA来源是沟通恐惧、考试焦虑和对负面评价的恐惧,它们的百分比相似(每个百分比为33.34%)。最后,本研究中所有焦虑学生使用的应对策略都是预期,属于妥协行为。关键词:口语焦虑;焦虑水平;焦虑来源
{"title":"EFL Learners’ Speaking Anxiety in an EOP Program","authors":"R. Irawan","doi":"10.22236/JER_VOL3ISSUE2PP193-203","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22236/JER_VOL3ISSUE2PP193-203","url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed at describing students’ speaking anxiety in EFL classroom at occupation level. It investigated EOP students’ speaking anxiety levels, their sources of anxiety and their coping strategies to reduce it. \u0000This research involved eight students from two classes with different English abilities and employed a qualitative research design, embracing the characteristics of a case study conducted in PT Rekacipta Miratama Bekasi from December 2016 to March 2017. Three kinds of instruments were applied for this research: classroom observation, questionnaires (adapted from Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale by Horwitz), and semi-structured interview. The data were collected by means audio and video recording to capture students’ sources of anxiety and their coping strategies and collaborated with a semi-structured interview. Those data were transcribed and coded by using the categorization from Alwasilahs’ coding strategy (2002) and obtained by quantifying questionnaires in order to know the students’ anxiety levels. \u0000The first finding reveals that the students who categorized as an anxious and a mildly anxious level had the highest percentage (each of them was 37%), while those who categorized as a relaxed and a very relaxed level had the lower of percentage (each of them was 17%). Secondly, the research participants who categorized as an anxious and a mildly anxious level stated that all FLA sources that are a communication apprehension, a test anxiety, and a fear of negative evaluation had similar percentages (each of them 33.34%). Lastly, coping strategies that all anxious students used in this research were anticipation that belonged to compromise behaviors.  \u0000  \u0000Keywords: Speaking Anxiety, Anxiety Levels, Anxiety Sources, Coping Strategies to Reduce FLA, EOP Students","PeriodicalId":55744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ELT Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47623361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
ROXIFYonline: Helping Students Improve Their Writing through Online Feedback ROXIFYonline:通过在线反馈帮助学生提高写作能力
Pub Date : 2018-07-23 DOI: 10.22236/jer_vol3issue2pp152-167
Roxanne Miller
Today’s students want immediate feedback on their writing which instructors often cannot provide.  They embrace the internet and want to use it for learning. To keep pace with these desires, Roxifyonline was created.   It is a new online Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) tool that provides automated essay feedback for use by students worldwide.  The program was originally written for ESL learners in Hong Kong, but is now being used by students throughout the Asia Pacific region. It is based on both empirical research and that of other academics.  The program is robust enough to be used for general academic writing from upper secondary through post-graduate levels.   It is a free Independent Learning (IL) tool. The program utilizes vocabulary to identify possible errors and provides online IL links to aid in the correction of possible errors in writing.  Unlike other programs, it does not provide suggested corrections. This can help students to become more autonomous in their learning. Comparisons can be made between drafts, and there is an annotation function which can allow for more individualized peer and teacher feedback.
如今的学生想要对他们的写作进行即时反馈,而导师往往无法提供反馈。他们拥抱互联网,并希望利用它进行学习。为了跟上这些欲望的步伐,Roxifyonline诞生了。这是一种新的在线计算机辅助语言学习(CALL)工具,提供自动化的论文反馈,供世界各地的学生使用。该课程最初是为香港的ESL学生编写的,但现在正被亚太地区的学生使用。它是基于实证研究和其他学者的研究。该项目足够强大,可以用于从高中到研究生的一般学术写作。这是一个免费的独立学习(IL)工具。该程序利用词汇表来识别可能的错误,并提供在线IL链接来帮助纠正写作中可能的错误。与其他程序不同,它不提供建议的更正。这可以帮助学生在学习中变得更加自主。可以在草稿之间进行比较,并且有一个注释功能,可以允许更个性化的同伴和老师反馈。
{"title":"ROXIFYonline: Helping Students Improve Their Writing through Online Feedback","authors":"Roxanne Miller","doi":"10.22236/jer_vol3issue2pp152-167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22236/jer_vol3issue2pp152-167","url":null,"abstract":"Today’s students want immediate feedback on their writing which instructors often cannot provide.  They embrace the internet and want to use it for learning. To keep pace with these desires, Roxifyonline was created. \u0000  \u0000It is a new online Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) tool that provides automated essay feedback for use by students worldwide.  The program was originally written for ESL learners in Hong Kong, but is now being used by students throughout the Asia Pacific region. It is based on both empirical research and that of other academics.  The program is robust enough to be used for general academic writing from upper secondary through post-graduate levels. \u0000  \u0000It is a free Independent Learning (IL) tool. The program utilizes vocabulary to identify possible errors and provides online IL links to aid in the correction of possible errors in writing.  Unlike other programs, it does not provide suggested corrections. This can help students to become more autonomous in their learning. Comparisons can be made between drafts, and there is an annotation function which can allow for more individualized peer and teacher feedback.","PeriodicalId":55744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ELT Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43599273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of ELT Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1